Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “PAUL D HOLLAND”
Paul v. Holland America Line, Inc.public domain
463 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2006) Marianne PAUL and Robert Paul, Plaintiffs, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C05-2016RSM. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. November 6, 2006. *1204 *1205 Elizabeth L. Crooke, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack, Los Angeles, CA,
Holland v. Rosenpublic domain
OPINION JEROME B. SIMANDLE, U.S. District Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 713 II. BACKGROUND...714 A. Historical Perspective on Bail in New Jersey.. .714 B. The Criminal Justice Reform Act.. .716 1. The Pre
Holland v. Arch Coal, Inc.public domain
DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH, United States District Judge The Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan (1992 Plan) bring this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended , 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. , to compel defendant Arch Coal, Inc.
Paul Retfalvi v. United Statespublic domain
HOLLANDER, District Judge: This appeal resolves a challenge to the constitutionality of a treaty authorizing the United States to collect unpaid income taxes on behalf of Canada. The issue arises in the context of a tax refund action filed by appellant Paul M. Retfalvi, M.D., the taxpayer. He filed suit against the United States, seeking a refund of approximately $125,000 in taxes colle
Brittan Holland v. Kelly Rosenpublic domain
AMBRO, Circuit Judge New Jersey's system of pretrial release has long relied on monetary bail to ensure the presence of an accused person at trial. State v. Robinson , 229 N.J. 44 ,
Holland v. City of Ontariopublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Milton Paul Holland, III, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations and state law claims in connection with the 1999 search of his property, and his subsequent arrest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Beene v. Terhune, 380 F.3d 1149, 11
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Hollandpublic domain
OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. Appellant Roger Earl Holland was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of Margorie Holland and her unborn child. 1 On appeal, Holland raises three arguments. First, Holland argues that the district court erred in admitting evidence from his cell
Holland v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
528 F.Supp.2d 728 (2007) Gloria J. HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-163. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 27, 2007. Themis J. Fotieo, Reamon Fotieo Szczytko & Fedewa, PC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Ronald M. Stella, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant.<
Holland v. Zimmerman (In Re Zimmerman)public domain
341 B.R. 77 (2006) In re Scott M. ZIMMERMAN, Debtor. Cynthia Holland, Individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Holland, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust; Michael Holland, Individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Holland, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust, William Keller, Suzanne Keller, Suzan Latona, Carmen Latona, Ed Hall, William Klump, Robert Thorn, Wayne Witter, Jo Ann Worrell, and Richard Worrell, Plaintiffs, v. Scott M. Zimmerman, Defend
Holland v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 1public domain
Filed 1/23/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH E. HOLLAND, as Assessor, etc., ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) S205876 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/6 B229656 ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD NO. 1, ) ) Defendant and Respondent; )
In Re Hollandpublic domain
293 B.R. 425 (2002) In re Frank HOLLAND, Debtor. No. 02-34387. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. December 23, 2002. *426 James L. Crates, Paul N. McKinley, Jr., Kenton, OH, John J. Hunter, Jr., H. Buswell Roberts, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, OH, Joseph C. Winner, McFadden, Winner & Savage, Columbus, OH, for credit
Holland v. Lely Manufacturing, Inc.public domain
*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commissio
Paul Capital Advisors L.L.C. v. Hollandpublic domain
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted: May 8, 2023 Date Decided: August 29, 2023 David E. Ross, Esquire
Paul v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPpublic domain
974 A.2d 140 (2009) Alan D. PAUL, Plaintiff Below-Appellant, v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP and Deloitte & Touche, USA, LLP, Defendant Below-Appellee. No. 336, 2008. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 4, 2009. Decided: May 20, 2009. *141 Gary W. Aber, Esquire, (argued) of Aber, Baker & Over, Wilmi
Holland v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. In this Winstar-related1 case, defendant, United States (“government”), moved on De*737cember 2,2003 to dismiss plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Oral argument was held on February 5,
Galentine v. Holland America Line-Westours, Inc.public domain
333 F.Supp.2d 991 (2004) Paul G. GALENTINE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE WESTOURS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C03-962P. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. March 12, 2004. *992 Michael Robert Caryl, Lawrence A. Costich, Kathleen H. Knight, Mikkelborg Broz Wells & Fryer, Seattle, WA,
Vance v. Hollandpublic domain
22 F.Supp.2d 529 (1998) Arnold VANCE, Plaintiff, v. Michael HOLLAND, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 97-0269-B. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division. October 5, 1998. *530 Lewey Keith Lee, Paul L. Phipps, Wise, VA, for Plaintiff. Charlie R. Jessee, Abingdon, Jerry Mims, Washington, DC, for De
Chrysler Group LLC v. South Holland Dodge, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER SEAN F. COX, District Judge. Following the 2009 bankruptcies of Chrysler LLC (“Old Chrysler”) and General Motors Corporation (“Old GM”), and actions taken to consolidate their respective dealer networks, Congress enacted Section 747 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-117 (“Section 747”). That Act was passed to grant certain arbitration rights to dea
Wicker v. Hollandpublic domain
495 S.E.2d 398 (1998) Ruth P. WICKER, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth W. HOLLAND, Gail M. Holland and George Sipsis, Defendants. Kenneth W. HOLLAND and Gail M. Holland, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. BOLES PAVING INCORPORATED d/b/a Sedgefield Paving, Third-Party Defendant. No. COA97-264. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 3, 1998.
Davis v. Hollandpublic domain
31 S.W.3d 574 (2000) Ronald L. DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Warden Flora J. HOLLAND, Associate Warden David Russell, Classification Coordinator Bob Ervin, Job Coordinator Charles D. Szostecki, Warden Ricky Bell, Commissioner Donal Campbell, Assistant Commissioner Charles Bass, and Classification Director Howard Cook, Defendant/Appellee. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.