⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “PAUL D HOLLAND”

District Court, W.D. Washington · 2006-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 463 F. Supp. 2d 1203; 2006 WL 3231979
463 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2006) Marianne PAUL and Robert Paul, Plaintiffs, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C05-2016RSM. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. November 6, 2006. *1204 *1205 Elizabeth L. Crooke, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack, Los Angeles, CA,
Holland v. Rosenpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017-09-21 · Published · cited 12× · 277 F. Supp. 3d 707
OPINION JEROME B. SIMANDLE, U.S. District Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 713 II. BACKGROUND...714 A. Historical Perspective on Bail in New Jersey.. .714 B. The Criminal Justice Reform Act.. .716 1. The Pre
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 346 F. Supp. 3d 99
DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH, United States District Judge The Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan (1992 Plan) bring this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended , 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. , to compel defendant Arch Coal, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-07-16 · Published · cited 226× · 930 F.3d 600
HOLLANDER, District Judge: This appeal resolves a challenge to the constitutionality of a treaty authorizing the United States to collect unpaid income taxes on behalf of Canada. The issue arises in the context of a tax refund action filed by appellant Paul M. Retfalvi, M.D., the taxpayer. He filed suit against the United States, seeking a refund of approximately $125,000 in taxes colle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-07-09 · Published · cited 151× · 895 F.3d 272
AMBRO, Circuit Judge New Jersey's system of pretrial release has long relied on monetary bail to ensure the presence of an accused person at trial. State v. Robinson , 229 N.J. 44 ,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 180 F. App'x 728
MEMORANDUM ** Milton Paul Holland, III, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations and state law claims in connection with the 1999 search of his property, and his subsequent arrest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Beene v. Terhune, 380 F.3d 1149, 11
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015-06-24 · Published · cited 14× · 865 N.W.2d 666; 2015 Minn. LEXIS 367
OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. Appellant Roger Earl Holland was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of Margorie Holland and her unborn child. 1 On appeal, Holland raises three arguments. First, Holland argues that the district court erred in admitting evidence from his cell
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007-09-27 · Published · cited 1× · 528 F. Supp. 2d 728; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96507; 2007 WL 4616698
528 F.Supp.2d 728 (2007) Gloria J. HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-163. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 27, 2007. Themis J. Fotieo, Reamon Fotieo Szczytko & Fedewa, PC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Ronald M. Stella, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant.<
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006-04-19 · Published · cited 13× · 341 B.R. 77; 2006 WL 1071767
341 B.R. 77 (2006) In re Scott M. ZIMMERMAN, Debtor. Cynthia Holland, Individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Holland, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust; Michael Holland, Individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Holland, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust, William Keller, Suzanne Keller, Suzan Latona, Carmen Latona, Ed Hall, William Klump, Robert Thorn, Wayne Witter, Jo Ann Worrell, and Richard Worrell, Plaintiffs, v. Scott M. Zimmerman, Defend
California Supreme Court · 2014-01-23 · Published · cited 37× · 58 Cal. 4th 482; 2014 D.A.R. 848; 316 P.3d 1188; 167 Cal. Rptr. 3d 74; 2014 WL 253730; 2014 Cal. LEXIS 426
Filed 1/23/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH E. HOLLAND, as Assessor, etc., ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) S205876 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/6 B229656 ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD NO. 1, ) ) Defendant and Respondent; )
In Re Hollandpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002-12-23 · Published · cited 3× · 293 B.R. 425; 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 1708; 2002 WL 32099794
293 B.R. 425 (2002) In re Frank HOLLAND, Debtor. No. 02-34387. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. December 23, 2002. *426 James L. Crates, Paul N. McKinley, Jr., Kenton, OH, John J. Hunter, Jr., H. Buswell Roberts, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, OH, Joseph C. Winner, McFadden, Winner & Savage, Columbus, OH, for credit
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commissio
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted: May 8, 2023 Date Decided: August 29, 2023 David E. Ross, Esquire
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009-05-20 · Published · cited 140× · 974 A.2d 140; 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 331; 2009 Del. LEXIS 234; 2009 WL 1396411
974 A.2d 140 (2009) Alan D. PAUL, Plaintiff Below-Appellant, v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP and Deloitte & Touche, USA, LLP, Defendant Below-Appellee. No. 336, 2008. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 4, 2009. Decided: May 20, 2009. *141 Gary W. Aber, Esquire, (argued) of Aber, Baker & Over, Wilmi
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2004-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 59 Fed. Cl. 735; 2004 U.S. Claims LEXIS 43; 2004 WL 503722
OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. In this Winstar-related1 case, defendant, United States (“government”), moved on De*737cember 2,2003 to dismiss plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Oral argument was held on February 5,
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2004-03-12 · Published · cited 5× · 333 F. Supp. 2d 991; 2004 A.M.C. 711; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13377; 2004 WL 1948621
333 F.Supp.2d 991 (2004) Paul G. GALENTINE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE — WESTOURS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C03-962P. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. March 12, 2004. *992 Michael Robert Caryl, Lawrence A. Costich, Kathleen H. Knight, Mikkelborg Broz Wells & Fryer, Seattle, WA,
Vance v. Hollandpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 2× · 22 F. Supp. 2d 529; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16300; 1998 WL 727231
22 F.Supp.2d 529 (1998) Arnold VANCE, Plaintiff, v. Michael HOLLAND, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 97-0269-B. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division. October 5, 1998. *530 Lewey Keith Lee, Paul L. Phipps, Wise, VA, for Plaintiff. Charlie R. Jessee, Abingdon, Jerry Mims, Washington, DC, for De
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012-03-27 · Published · cited 1× · 862 F. Supp. 2d 661; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41438; 2012 WL 1033518
OPINION & ORDER SEAN F. COX, District Judge. Following the 2009 bankruptcies of Chrysler LLC (“Old Chrysler”) and General Motors Corporation (“Old GM”), and actions taken to consolidate their respective dealer networks, Congress enacted Section 747 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-117 (“Section 747”). That Act was passed to grant certain arbitration rights to dea
Wicker v. Hollandpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998-02-03 · Published · cited 7× · 495 S.E.2d 398; 128 N.C. App. 524; 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 99
495 S.E.2d 398 (1998) Ruth P. WICKER, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth W. HOLLAND, Gail M. Holland and George Sipsis, Defendants. Kenneth W. HOLLAND and Gail M. Holland, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. BOLES PAVING INCORPORATED d/b/a Sedgefield Paving, Third-Party Defendant. No. COA97-264. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 3, 1998.
Davis v. Hollandpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000-03-29 · Published · cited 17× · 31 S.W.3d 574; 2000 Tenn. App. LEXIS 184; 2000 WL 313537
31 S.W.3d 574 (2000) Ronald L. DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Warden Flora J. HOLLAND, Associate Warden David Russell, Classification Coordinator Bob Ervin, Job Coordinator Charles D. Szostecki, Warden Ricky Bell, Commissioner Donal Campbell, Assistant Commissioner Charles Bass, and Classification Director Howard Cook, Defendant/Appellee. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.