Cases

F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judge. Intervenors-plaintiffs-appellants Greenwich Insurance Co. and NAC Insurance Co. (“Sureties”) appeal the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (George B. Daniels, Judge), entered on June 3, 2002, denying Sureties’ motion to intervene in an action — filed by other plaintiffs, none of whom are a party to this appeal — against the Big Red Boat II (“BRBII”). The

875 F.Supp. 1107 (1994) Lamont R. JACKSON, Sr. v. Joseph NICOLETTI, Officer, and Remshaw, Officer. Civ. A. No. 94-4229. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 28, 1994. As Amended December 21, 1994. Lamont R. Jackson, Sr., pro se. Milton Velez, Asst. City Sol., Philadelphia, PA, for defendants. MEMORANDUM<

339 F.3d 76 PATRICIA HAYES ASSOCIATES, INC., Smithall Electronics, Inc., Southern Marine Electric Co., Inc., Alpha Marine, Inc., Nordica Engineering, Inc., Callenberg Engineering, Inc., Tramp Oil & Marine Ltd, Triton Marine Fuel Ltd, the Boston Pilots, Arthur Whittemnore, Capt., L.J. Cannon, R.B. Emery, R. Stover, J. Collins, C. Hoyt, J.S. Cardomy, R.P. Cushman, J.E. Frye, Jr., R.G. Cordes, F.R. Morton, G.H. Farmer, Massachusetts Port Authority

[1] ORDER [2] This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on November 14, 1994, pursuant to an order that directed the plaintiff, Sumner Pomeranz, to show cause why his appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiff has appealed the granting by the Superior Court of a directed verdict in favor of defendant Patricia Nicoletti and the denial of his motion for a new trial. [3] After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after considerin

People v Harvey (2023 NY Slip Op 01099) People v Harvey 2023 NY Slip Op 01099 Decided on March 1, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Nicholson v Sabey Data Ctr. Props., LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 02892) Nicholson v Sabey Data Ctr. Props., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 02892 Decided on April 26, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State La

OPINION OF THE COURT Jones, J. In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether persons who have testified in a Civil Service Law § 75 disciplinary hearing are required to disqualify themselves from subsequently acting upon any of the charges related to that hearing. We hold that, because the testimony of the testifying witnesses, concerning the charges levied pursuant to section 75, rendered them per

927 So.2d 246 (2006) GULF SHORES, L.L.C., Appellant, v. RIVERWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, Joseph and Patricia J. Bartkus, Nancy Diasparra, Antonion Innarelli, Patrick Leonard, S & B Cutter, Barbara McDonald, Joseph Bush, Elizabeth O'Brien, William Mack, Thorton Ivenor, Daniel Mehlman, Harry Knobloch, Teddy Gibula, Richard Holden, Randolph Rebhan, Edward Furstein, Robert Crosby, and Robert Fegan, Appellees. No. 2D

920 So.2d 694 (2006) Salvatore A. ITALIANO, Appellant, v. Patricia M. ITALIANO, Appellee. No. 2D05-3612. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 8, 2006. *695 Lorena L. Kiely of Law Office of Lorena L. Kiely; and David A. Maney of Maney, Damsker, Jones & Kuhlman, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Ronal

People v Stewart (2025 NY Slip Op 06737) People v Stewart 2025 NY Slip Op 06737 Decided on December 3, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is unco

250 P.3d 245 (2011) Adam WICKHAM, an Arizona resident; Linda Wickham and Richard Wickham, individually and as parents of Adam Wickham, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Tricia HOPKINS, an Arizona Resident; Jan and Larry Hopkins, Individually and as parents of Tricia Hopkins, Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 09-0523. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. April 19, 2011

OPINION OF THE COURT Patricia P. Satterfield, J. This Court holds that a cause of action based upon negligent spoliation of evidence may be asserted by an insured in a third-party action against its insurer based upon the insurer’s alleged loss or destruction of key evidence crucial to the insured’s defense in the underlying action. This is an action to recover for damages to property caused b

966 So.2d 506 (2007) Patricia BYERS and Steven Byers; and Todd Miles, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Todd Byers, deceased, Appellants, v. The RADIANT GROUP, L.L.C., Appellee. No. 2D06-4437. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. October 19, 2007. Jeffrey Lee Gordon of Maney & Gordon, P.A., Tampa; and Deborah L. Appel

OPINION VOSS, Presiding Judge. We review the summary judgment granted defendants-appellees against plaintiff-appellant on his libel claim. The Arizona Republic (Republic) twice reported that Thane Read was sentenced for firing a gun after a motorist accidentally leaned on her car horn. The Phoenix Gazette (Gazette) reported that Read was sentenced after displaying a gun to a motorist who accidentally leaned o

168 Ariz. 178 (1990) 812 P.2d 996 CITIBANK (ARIZONA), an Arizona Banking Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC., a Minnesota Corporation; Wolfson & Frankel, a Law Partnership; Barry M. Wolfson and Deborah Wolfson, Husband and Wife; Martin S. Frankel and Colleen Frankel, Husband and Wife, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 88-439. Court of

OPINION BROWN, Judge. ¶ 1 Patrick McMurtry, as personal representative of the estate of Toni Lucario and on behalf of her surviving children, appeals the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Weatherford Hotel, Inc., (“Hotel”) on his claims for premises and dram shop liability arising out of Lucario’s death. McMurtry also challenges the court’s evidentiary rulings regarding an exp

188 Conn. 591 (1982) STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RALPH A. MATURO (10150) Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued October 5, 1982. Decision released November 30, 1982. SPEZIALE, C. J., PETERS, HEALEY, PARSKEY and COVELLO, JS. *592 Frank A. Leone, with whom, on the brief, was Samuel H. Teller, for the

989 F.Supp. 1262 (1997) Robert CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. Daryl GATES, et al., Defendants. Armand SOLY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Daryl GATES, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV96-2666 JSL, CV96-4157 JSL. United States District Court, C.D. California. December 16, 1997. *1263 *1264 Stephen Ya

88 F.3d 111 In re STATE POLICE LITIGATION.CONNECTICUT CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, JosephKeefe, Individually and as President of Connecticut CriminalDefense Lawyers Association, John R. Gulash, William J.Sweeney, Denise Derby, Donald Couture, Timothy B. Young,Roderick Young, Barbara Schuyler, Conrad Seifert, Attorney,William Gerace, Attorney, Martin Minella, Attorney, WilliamDow, Jay Martin Sulzach, Attorney, Ro

(2008) In re SEPTEMBER 11 LITIGATION. No. 21 MC 101 (formerly 21 MC 97) (AKH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 24, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER REGULATING FEE ALLOWANCES AND DISAPPROVING SETTLEMENTS ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: Four of the last remaining plaintiff's in the wrongful death actions against the airlines and o