Cases

PER CURIAM. Don Earle Morgan appeals his convictions and sentences for one count of criminal mischief in violation of section 806.13(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (2014), and one count of burglary of a dwelling in violation of section 810.02(3)(a). The written judgment improperly identifies the criminal mischief as a first-degree misdemeanor, rather than a second-degree misdemeanor. Accordingly, we reman

ALTENBERND, Judge. Don Earle Morgan appeals his judgments and sentences for criminal mischief and burglary of a dwelling. See §§ 806.13(l)(a), (b)(2), 810.02(l)(b), (3), Fla. Stat. (2013). We reverse because the trial court’s unusual discussion of the law during jury selection and the error in the jury instructions require that Mr. Morgan receive a new trial.

MEMORANDUM BENSON EVERETT LEGG, District Judge. Plaintiff, Pamela Onusko, brings this action against her former employer, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (“Chase”), advancing claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and deceit. Now pending is Chase’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Docket No. 49. The issues have been comprehensively briefed, and on July 15, 2011 the Court hear

VILLANTI, Judge. Earnest Morgan appeals his convictions and sentences in circuit court case number 05-CF-21005 for one count of violating the Florida Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, one count of conspiracy to violate the Florida RICO Act, and one count of felon in possession of a firearm.1 Because the record on appeal is inadequate to allow this court to determine wheth

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: I completely agree with Judge Wilson that this case is one that should be reheard en banc. However, I do so because I believe the panel opinion makes a critical mistake in holding that the rule established in Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), is procedural. In my view, the rule

COHEN, J. Justin Timothy Morgan appeals from his conviction of attempted lewd or lascivious exhibition following a jury trial. This case arose from a Craigslist advertisement posted by a detective with the Citrus County Sheriffs Office. The advertisement, placed in the “casual encounters” section of the website, was entitled “Opened Minded Mom looking to share intimate fun — w4m—38,” signifying a thirty-eight-year-old woman

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412, 2012 WL 2849485 (Fla.2012). PADOVANO, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. Terrance L. Anthony appeals his conviction and life sentence for first-degree murder. We affirm the conviction without discussion. However, because Anthony was a juvenile on the date of the offense, we remand for resentencing pursuant to Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393 (Fla.2015). Although the trial court properly followed the

935 A.2d 1046 (2007) Gary L. SAMPLE, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated on Counts I, IV, V, and VI and on behalf of Nominal Defendant Randall Bearings, Inc., on Counts II, III, and VI, Plaintiff, v. Kent P. MORGAN, Jeffrey L. Hager, David L. Wierwille, Kenneth C. Harrod, Stephen M. Richmond, Baker & Hostetler LLP, and Joseph P. Boeckman, Defendants, and Randall Bearings, Inc., Nominal Defendant.

919 A.2d 21 (2007) 397 Md. 509 MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY v. Pamela R. WALKER. No. 74 Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 15, 2007. *22 Sally L. Swann, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen. of MD, on brief), Baltimore, MD, for Petitioner. Gary A. Stein (Ain & Stein,

914 A.2d 647 (2007) Gary L. SAMPLE, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated on Counts I, IV and V and on behalf of Nominal Defendant Randall Bearings, Inc., on Counts II and III, Plaintiff, v. Kent P. MORGAN, Jeffrey L. Hager, David L. Wierwille, Kenneth C. Harrod, Stephen M. Richmond, Defendants, and Randall Bearings, Inc., Nominal Defendant. C.A. No. 1214-N. Court of Chancery of D

Opinion on Intervention LYNN N. HUGHES, District Judge. 1. Introduction. A non-party witness for investors has moved to intervene to strike all adverse references to him from the court’s opinion. The investment fund says that the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the motion and that the witness does not have grounds to intervene. The fund will prevail.

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS William C. Morgan, Petitioner Below, Petitioner FILED November 23, 2015 vs) No. 13-1085 (Greenbrier County 11-C-36) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME CO

OPINION Ken Wise, Justice These appeals concern the conservator-ship of a child, Adam, who has been embroiled in custody litigation for most of his life.1 This is Adam’s second trip to the court of appeals. The first appellate proceeding arose from the termination of Adam’s parents’ parental rights. Both his mother, T.H. (“Mother”), and his father, L.M. (“Fathe

h MURRAY, Judge. Defendants, Thomas Lee Whaley, III and the New Orleans City Park Improvement Association, appeal the trial court’s award of damages and equitable relief in favor of the plaintiffs, Iris and Sundance Morgan.1 We reverse the award of damages for the reasons that follow. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW In their petition filed March 31, 1989, the M

740 F.Supp.2d 525 (2010) Jeannette HAUSLER, Petitioner, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Citibank, N.A., UBS AG, The Royal Bank of Scotland, N.V. and Bank of America, N.A., Respondents. No. 09 CIV. 10289(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 13, 2010. *526 Alfonso J. Perez, Rasco Reininger Perez & Esquenaz

536 U.S. 101 (2002) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. MORGAN No. 00-1614. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 9, 2002. Decided June 10, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *102 *103 *104

Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court. This case and a companion, Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. v. Discovery Operating, Inc. , 1 also decided today, require us to interpret retained-acreage provisions in oil-and-gas lease instruments. We lay out more fully in

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 20, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-0973 Lower Tribunal No. 19-27344 ________________ Pamela Levy, Appellant,

OPINION BY KEITH RAPP, JUDGE: ¶1 Trial court respondent, Mark Ray Morgan, (Father) appeals the trial court's Order for Parental Support of a Disabled Adult Child ordering Father to pay support for his disabled adult son. Father also appeals the trial court's order awarding attorney's fees to Heather Marie Morgan, now Gruenberg (Mother). BACKGROUND ¶2 Father and Mother were married on