Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-3381 ________________ THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A., Appellant v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 3-17-cv-13467) District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiff Charles L. DeCesare (“Plaintiff’ or “DeCesare”) brings this Action against Defendants The Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and The Dress Bam Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”) (collectively “Defendants”) for violations of § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B),

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P. J.A.D. These consolidated appeals raise facial challenges to the validity of regulations adopted by respondent, New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, Division of Insurance (DOBI), pursuant to the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act, L. 1998, c. 21 (AICRA). This court and our Supreme Court denied applications for a stay of the regulatio

438 F.Supp.2d 1134 (2006) Howard BOYD, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, the Boeing Company Long Term Disability Plan, the Boeing Company Medical Plan, the Boeing Life Insurance Plan, and the Boeing Company Pension/Retirement Plan, Defendants. No. EDCV 05-466-SGL. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 28, 2006. *

647 F.Supp.2d 397 (2009) Shao-Hui T. KAO, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-2824 (JEI/AMD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 25, 2009. *398 Bross & Group, PA by Richard Lowell Frankel, Esq., Cherry Hill, NJ, for Plaintiff

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Mist Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Berkley Insurance Company (A-34-24) (089689) Argued October 9, 2025 -- Decided May 11, 2026 JUSTICE PATTERSON, writing for the Court. In this appeal, the Court considers

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL

ACCEPTED 03-16-00203-CV 13816645 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 23-2189 ________________ ALISON GEORGE, Appellant v. RUSHMORE SERVICE CENTER, LLC; MILES K. BEACOM; DALE DOBBERPUHL; THOMAS D. SANFORD; JOHN DOES 1 to 10 ________________ On Appeal

346 F.3d 442 Joseph V. DIFELICE, Jr., Appellantv.AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE; Michael Picariello, M.D.; Sarah Fowler; Ear Nose & Throat Assoc. of Chester County, Inc.; Chester County Hospital. No. 02-3381. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued March 14, 2003. Filed October 15, 2003.

168 F.3d 92 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, on behalf ofits members, Robert LANDER, Adam Jacobs, JoelSolow and Ann Sorrelv.Bret SCHUNDLER, in his official capacity as Mayor of theCity of Jersey City, New Jersey; The City Councilof Jersey City, New Jersey; City ofJersey City, New Jersey, Appellants. No. 98-5021. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circui

36 F.Supp.2d 560 (1999) BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC., and its subsidiary, Medigroup of New Jersey, Inc. (d/b/a HMO Blue); Associated Hospital Service of Maine (d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Maine), and its subsidiaries, Machigonne, Inc. (d/b/a Benefit Management of Maine) and Benefit Management, Inc.; BCBSD, Inc. (d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Delaware); Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its affiliates, Health Opt

*474OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before this court on an appeal by Joseph Maio, Jo Ann Maio and Gary Bender (hereinafter “appellants”) from the district court’s final order entered September 29, 1999, which granted motions to dismiss appellants’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)

803 F.Supp.2d 295 (2011) JERSEY ASPARAGUS FARMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, Defendant. Civil No. 10-2849 (FLW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 31, 2011. *297 Donald Clark Simpson, Moorestown, NJ, for Plaintiff. Stephen R. Buckingham, Michael J. Hahn, Lowenstein Sandler, PC, Roseland, NJ, for

OPINION & ORDER GERSHON, District Judge: Plaintiff Elle Carmichael, as administra-trix of the estate of her daughter, Romona Moore, identified in the complaint as African-American, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1981. She alleges that defendant City of New York, as part of a discriminatory city-wide practice, deprived Ms. Moore of her constitutional rights by failing to l

73 F.3d 1178 64 USLW 2447 STONEWALL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Underwriters at Lloyds,Continental Casualty Company, American Motorists InsuranceCompany, Affiliated FM Insurance Company, Republic InsuranceCompany, First State Insurance Company, United States

BECKER, Circuit Judge, concurring. I am satisfied that Judge Rendell’s opinion reaches the correct result under our governing caselaw. While I thus join in her opinion and in the judgment, I write separately to add my voice to the rising judicial chorus urging that Congress and the Supreme Court revisit what is an unjust and increasingly tangled ERISA regime. Congress enacted ERISA in 197

83 F.3d 610 64 USLW 2711, 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 407,26 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,138 Robert A. GEORGINE; Laverne Winbun, Executrix of the Estateof Joseph E. Winbun, Deceased, and in Her Own Right;Ambrose Vogt, Jr.; Joanne Vogt, His Wife; Carlos Raver;Dorothy M. Raver, His Wife; Timothy Murphy; Gay Murphy, HisWife; Ty T. Annas; Anna Marie Baumgartner, Executrix ofthe Estate of John A. Baumgartner, Deceas

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,000 senior citizens, allege tha