Cases

NANCY BRICKER, Employee, Plaintiff, v. RHONEY FURNITURE HOUSE, Employer, SELECTIVE INSURANCE CO., Carrier, Defendants. No. COA09-314. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed: January 19, 2010. This case not for publication Rudisill, White & Kaplan, P.L.L.C., by Garth H. White and John R. Blythe, for defendant-appellants. Randy D. Duncan for plaintiff

518 S.E.2d 536 (1999) Dennis RHONEY, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Vincent Wade Rhoney and Patsy C. Rhoney, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Vincent Wade Rhoney, Plaintiffs, v. Tony Kona FELE, Devon Vonshell Furtick, and Nursefinders of Indianapolis, Inc., t/a d/b/a Nursefinders of Charlotte, Defendants. No. COA98-1299. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 17, 1999.<

*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence modifies and affirms the Opinion and Award of the deputy commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes

20 Kan. App. 2d 123 (1994) PATRICIA K. GRAGG, d/b/a KAY ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee, v. JOSEPH A. RHONEY, f/d/b/a U.S. WEAPONS COLLECTORS, U.S. WEAPONS COLLECTORS, INC., and TOPEKA GUN AND KNIFE SHOW, INC., Appellants. No. 70,625 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed November 10, 1994. Alan P. Blinzler, of Overland Park, for the appellants.

136 S.E.2d 40 (1964) 261 N.C. 674 Thurman SHORT v. Joyce Iva CHAPMAN, a Minor, by her Guardian ad Litem, Velma W. Rhoney. No. 174. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 29, 1964. *42 Carpenter, Webb & Golding, by John G. Golding, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellant. Hollowell & Stott, by Gra

This is an appeal from an order changing the custody of a minor child. Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1968 and thereafter lived together as husband and wife until 26 August 1973, when they separated. One child, George Brian Rhoney, was born of their marriage. On 16 July 1974 they signed a separation agreement *Page 12 in which they agreed that custody of the child should be awarded to its mother and that the father should have visitation r

DILLON, Judge. *410 This matter stems from a traffic accident in which Yvonne Lewis was struck and killed by an automobile being driven by Defendant Richard Charlton as Ms. Lewis was walking across a public street. Plaintiff Kevin McKenzie, in his capacity as the admini

HUDSON, Justice. **328Plaintiffs appeal the North Carolina Business Court's 18 August 2017 order and opinion granting in part and denying in part defendants' motions to dismiss and for partial summary judgment and its 5 April 2018 order and opinion dismissing plaintiffs' remaining claims under Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs are li

Synovus Bank v. Parks, 2013 NCBC 40. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE BUNCOMBE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 10 CVS 5819 SYNOVUS BANK, Plaintiff, v. TERRY R. PARKS and HELAINE V. PARKS, Defendants, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Plainti

833 F.Supp. 203 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Louis SCOZZAFAVA and Alvin Rhoney, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America v. Louis SCOZZAFAVA, Defendant. Nos. 92-CR-70A, 92-CR-237A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 22, 1993. *204 Patrick H. NeMoyer, U.S. Atty., Buffalo, NY, for the Government (D

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This case, originally brought against 23 defendants where the eight above-captioned now remain, comes before the court on motions premised on Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure separately filed March 10, 2015, on behalf of defen*784dants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“JMM”) (DE 151) and Form

Griffin Mgmt. Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co., 2009 NCBC 25. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 05 CVS 14428 GRIFFIN MANAGEMENT CORP.; ) BRUCE MAGERS, TRUSTEE IN ) BANKRUPTCY FOR GRIFFIN ) SERVICES, INC., AND C. EDWIN ) ALLMAN, III, TRUSTEE IN ) BANKRUPTCY FOR JOHN GRIFFIN, ) INDIVIDUALLY, )

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3127 JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH, Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail, Respondents-

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3127 JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH, Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail, Respondents-

Deyton v. Estate of Waters, 2013 NCBC 25. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 10 CVS 2582 ROBERT G. DEYTON, JR., M.D., and ) YVONNE S. DEYTON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc., 2017 NCBC 72. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF FORSYTH 13 CVS 2595 SUSAN SYKES d/b/a ADVANCED CHIROPRACTIC AND HEALTH CENTER; DAWN PATRICK; TROY LYNN; LIFEWORKS ON LAKE NORMAN, PLLC; BRENT BOST; and BOST CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.A., Plaintiffs, v. HEALTH NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.

572 S.E.2d 200 (2002) SOUTHEASTERN SHELTER CORPORATION and Jerry Chesson, Plaintiffs, v. BTU, INC., Paul Silcox and Marc Gilfillan, Defendants. No. COA01-1257. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 3, 2002. *202 Randolph M. James, P.C., by Randolph M. James, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellants. Newsom, Graham, H

MARTIN, Chief Judge. Petitioner Kevin McClain pled guilty to the felony offense of indecent liberties with a child on 29 January 2001. He was sentenced to fifteen to eighteen months imprisonment, thirty-six months of supervised probation, and was required to register as a sex offender under the North Carolina Sex Offender and Public Protection Registration Program, N.C.G.S. §§ 14-208.7-19A, which he did on 7 August 2001.

Judge Parker dissenting.- I respectfully dissent. Plaintiff did not assign error on the basis of defendant’s untimely plea in abatement, but rather in both his assignments plaintiff steadfastly asserted that his action is a new civil action over which the trial court had jurisdiction. “Each assignment of error shall, so far as practicable, be confined to a single issue of law; and shall state plainly, concisely an

WELLS, Judge. Petitioners contend the court erred in denying their motions for a directed verdict, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and a new trial on respondents’ claim for title to the disputed property under the doctrine of adverse possession under color of title. They argue that respondents did not contend or present any evidence tending to show that they possessed any document which could constitute color of title, t