Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Owens v. The Incorporated Village of Garden City”
Skates v. Incorporated Village of Freeportpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge: Plaintiff Earline Skates (“Plaintiff’ or “Skates”) commenced this action against Defendant Incorporated Village of Free-port (“Defendant” or the “Village”), seeking redress for: (i) racial discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq.; (ii) violation
J. E. v. Incorporated Vil. of Westburypublic domain
J. E. v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury (2021 NY Slip Op 06835) J. E. v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury 2021 NY Slip Op 06835 Decided on December 8, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law
973 F.Supp. 338 (1997) DEEPWELLS ESTATES INC. and Nicholas Petervary, Plaintiffs, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF HEAD OF THE HARBOR, Edward W. Hoffman, Daniel J. Shybunko, Glen G. Williams, Barbara Van Liew, David Sayre, Frank Zingale, Marie D. Wiese, each in their individual capacities and in their official capacities as members of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Head of the Harbor and William C. Miller and Richard Wiedersum, bo
DeVito v. Incorporated Village of Valley Streampublic domain
991 F.Supp. 137 (1998) James V. DEVITO, Plaintiff, v. The INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF VALLEY STREAM; George Donley, as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream; Michael Belfiore, as Trustee of the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream; Paul Brown, as Trustee of the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream; Thomas Williams, as Village Attorney of the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream; Vincent W. Ang, as Village Clerk of the Incorporated Vil
Hallstrom v. CITY OF GARDEN CITY, ID.public domain
811 F.Supp. 1443 (1991) Sue HALLSTROM and Robert C. Hallstrom, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF GARDEN CITY, ID., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 87-1360. United States District Court, D. Idaho. May 3, 1991. *1444 Robert C. and Sue Hallstrom, pro se. John L. King, Cantrill Skinner Sullivan & King, Boise, ID, for defendants City of
Flowers v. Owenspublic domain
*220MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND Mr. Flowers has sued the defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that in May-2007 he was beaten while in custody at the Will County Correctional Facility. The Complaint seeks compensatory and punitive dam
Arch Resorts, LLC v. the City of McKinney, Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01108-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11/2/2015 3:50:45 PM LISA
State of Alaska v. Department of the Interiorpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) STATE OF ALASKA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0330 (PLF)
Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Restaurantpublic domain
130 P.3d 1280 (2006) Paul D.S. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. EMPEROR'S GARDEN RESTAURANT; Nevada Dragon, Inc.; Tina S. Chen; and Alan Chen, Respondents. Paul D.S. Edwards, Appellant, v. Cenicola-Helvin Enterprises, D/B/A Bannerview.com; Mark Cenicola; and Jeff R. Helvin, Respondents. Nos. 44135, 44483. Supreme Court of Nevada. March 30, 2006. Rehearing Den
ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM
City of Cleveland ex rel. Wade v. City of Clevelandpublic domain
*898 OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon the Motions of Defendants, City of Cleveland (“City”), Cleveland Botanical Gardens (“CBG”), and University Circle Incorporated (“UCI”), to Dismiss the Complaint. (ECF DKT #10, # 12 & # 14). Defendants argue that Plaintiff, Willi
Didden v. Village of Port Chesterpublic domain
304 F.Supp.2d 548 (2004) Bart DIDDEN, Domenick Bologna, Fred DeCesare, Cabernet 119 Realty Corp., Opus 113 Corp., Pauillace 115 Realty Corp., 117 North Main Street Corp., Plaintiffs, v. The VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER, The Board of Trustees for the Village of Port Chester, Gerald Logan, individually and in his official capacity as Village Trustee for the Village of Port Chester, Daniel Colangelo, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Vill
In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
Dacosta v. City of N.Y.public domain
Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction...576 II. Facts...576 III. Procedural History...577 IV. Law...578 A. Standard of Review from Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations...578 B. Statute of Limitations...579 C. Motion for Leave to Amend a Plead
DESOTO WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT, INC. V. THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-149-CV DESOTO WILDWOOD APPELLANT D
</
In re City of Detroitpublic domain
Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <
Village of Lannon v. Wood-Land Contractors, Inc.public domain
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. In this action to collect unpaid personal property taxes, Wood-Land Contractors, Inc., (Wood-Land) seeks review of a court of appeals' decision that affirmed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Village of *161Lannon (Lannon).1 It contends that its equipment is tax exempt under Wis. Stat. § 7
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ Nos. 20-1749 and 20-1766 _______________________ GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, Appellant in No. 20-1766 v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,