Cases

87 F.3d 1338 318 U.S.App.D.C. 329, 35 Fed.R.Serv.3d 306,110 Ed. Law Rep. 924 RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC., et al., Appellants,v.Bruce BABBITT, Secretary of the United States Department ofthe Interior and Ada E. Deer, Assistant Secretaryfor Indian Affairs, United StatesDepartment of the Interior, Appellees. Nos. 95-5334, 95-5348. United States

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. WALD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. (“Ramah”) and the Puyallup Tribe of Indians (“Puyallup”) have challenged a plan initiated by the Secretary of the Interior for disbursing fiscal year 1995 contract support funds appropriated by Congress for distribut

63 Cal.App.3d 262 (1976) 133 Cal. Rptr. 628 VACCO INDUSTRIES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NAVAJO FREIGHT LINES, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 47193. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. October 29, 1976. *266 COUNSEL Alfred D. Freis for Defendant and Appellant

DAVIS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Perhaps the most complex and troublesome of the remaining litigations under the Indian Claims Commission Act are the accounting claims of the Navajo Tribe (Nos. 69, 299 and 353). Since the transfer of those cases to us from the Commission in December 1976, the court has already passed five times upon separate aspects of one or another of the claims.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge J. SKELLY WRIGHT. J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: Petitioners-appellants’1 (hereinafter petitioners) challenge to the refusal of *197the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise his previously promulgated standards of performance for new coal-fired po

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff, Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. (“Eco Tour”), a Wyoming-based small business, seeks rescission of two concession contracts for cross-country ski touring services in Grand Teton National Park (“the disputed contracts”) that were awarded to two incumbent concessioners, despite a ruling from the U.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TOXCO INC., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 09-1925 : v. : Re Document Nos.: 3, 7, 15 : STEVEN CHU,

724 F.Supp.2d 16 (2010) TOXCO INC., Plaintiff, v. Steven CHU, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy, Defendant. Civil Action No.: 09-1925. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 20, 2010. *18 Charles A. Patrizia, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Washington, DC, for Pla

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Southampton Union Free School District, a New York School District’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or to Transfer Venue, filed December 17, 2015 (Doc. 5)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on March 8, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has per

515 F.2d 654 38 A.L.R.Fed. 558, 169 U.S.App.D.C. 195,5 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,481 OLJATO CHAPTER OF the NAVAJO TRIBE et al., Appellants,v.Russell E. TRAIN, Administrator of the EnvironmentalProtection Agency.RED MESA CHAPTER OF the NAVAJO TRIBE, Oljato Chapter ofJicarilla Apache Tribe of Indians, Committee to Save BlackMesa, Inc., Paul Goodman, Mary Gillis, Jackson Gillis, DellaMarie G. Black,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ' JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. The Export-Import Bank of the United States has long been in the business of issuing loan guarantees to support foreign airlines’ purchases of aircraft from domestic manufacturers. While the Bank’s involvement in the air-travel industry undoubtedly serves the interests of

767 F.2d 1469 J & J ANDERSON, INC., d/b/a Feathaire Aviation, Inc., aColorado Corporation, Joanne Marie Anderson,Gerald Leverantz, David Nixon, and MonteHaskell, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The TOWN OF ERIE, a Colorado Municipal Corporation,Defendant-Appellee. No. 84-2110. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. July 18, 1985.

620 So.2d 1244 (1993) CASA CLARA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. CHARLEY TOPPINO AND SONS, INC., etc., et al., Respondents. Christopher H. CHAPIN, et al., Petitioners, v. CHARLEY TOPPINO AND SONS, INC., etc., et al., Respondents. Nos. 79127, 79128. Supreme Court of Florida. June 24, 1993. H. Hugh McConnell and Steven M. Siegf

BARRETT, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. J & J Anderson, Inc., et al., appellants, seek review o

ESTES, Judge. The plaintiff-appellee, Pasco, Inc., sought and obtained, in the district court, injunctive relief from enforcement of the defendants-appellants’, Federal Energy Administration, et al. (FEA), Old Oil Entitlements Program, 10 C.F.R. § 211.67 (Entitlements program), 39 F.R. 42,246 (December 4, 1974), and a declaratory judgment that the Entitlements program is invalid as applied to Pasco, on the grounds that: th

SETH, Chief Judge. The trial court held that the Corps-Tulsa final contract for water storage space in Oologah Reservoir and repayment of the City’s share of cost was a major federal action requiring a full NEPA impact statement by the Corps of Engineers. The Corps takes this appeal and urges that there were no discretionary elements left as all the planning, contracting for space and construction had been completed, thus no d

*1284 GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act joined the Environmental Protection Agency and the fifty states in a delicate partnership charged with controlling and eventually eliminating water pollution throughout the United States. The petition before u

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Seva Resorts, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Seva Development Corporation, an Arizona corporation, (Seva) appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing the action and denying Seva’s motion for an injunction against Donald Hodel, Secretary of the Interior (Secretary). Seva sought an order from the district court that would compel the Secretary

MERCER, Chief Judge (dissenting). I cannot agree with the decision of the majority of the court and I therefore dissent. I would hold that the order of the Commission granting the certificate of public convenience and necessity to Short Line1 was entered in violation of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and that the o

574 F.2d 553 187 U.S.App.D.C. 342 INDEPENDENT COSMETIC MANUFACTURERS AND DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE,United States Food and Drug Administration and DonaldKennedy, Commissioner of Food and DrugAdministration, Respondents.INDEPENDENT COSMETIC MANUFACTURERS AND DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Appellant,v.Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., Secretary of