Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ NO. 20-0340 ══════════ IN RE SALON A LA MODE, ET AL. ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ══════════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, joined by JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE BOYD

JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *358Outlaw is a manufacturer of male dietary supplements, the Tristeel Products. Outlaw has sued convenience stores because they "advertise and offer for sale" competing male dietary supplements, the Rhino Products. Outlaw alleges that these retailers have committed false advertising under the Lanha

Reversed and Rendered and Opinion filed August 13, 2024. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00425-CV BRCC ENTERPRISES LLC, Appellant V. JESSE SKIE, Appellee On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

668 S.E.2d 13 (2008) VAUGHTERS v. OUTLAW. No. A08A1829. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 19, 2008. *15 Celeste F. Brewer, for appellant. Shelby A. Outlaw, Decatur, pro se. BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge. In this civil action, Shelby Outlaw (d/b/a The Outlaw Firm, P.C.), an attorney, brought suit against Dr.

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART OUTLAW'S MOTION TO DISMISS (2) DENYING OUTLAW'S MOTION TO STRIKE Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court are two motions. The first is a motion by Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Outlaw Laboratory, LP ("Outlaw") to dismiss the counterclaims of Defendant/Counterclaimant Roma Mikha, Inc., and Third-Party

No. 01-14-00707-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 10/30/2015 1:52:16 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE at HOUSTON, TEXAS Clerk –––––––––

TOWN OF STRATFORD v. HAWLEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. (AC 38554) Sheldon, Beach and Harper, Js. Syllabus The defendant I Co., which held a first mortgage on certain real property that was taken by eminent domain by the plaintiff town, appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court awarding it damages for the taking. I Co. claimed that the trial court improperly determined that the tow

TOWN OF STRATFORD v. HAWLEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. (AC 38554) Sheldon, Beach and Harper, Js. Syllabus The defendant I Co., which held a first mortgage on certain real property that was taken by eminent domain by the plaintiff town, appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court awarding it damages for the taking. I Co. claimed that the trial court improperly determined that the tow

ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. This action is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 36) and supporting documents (Docs. 37-38) filed by Defendant Fourteen D Enterprises, Inc. (“FDE”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, along with the Response in opposition (Doc. 44) and supporting documents (Docs. 45-47) filed by Plain

ACCEPTED 03-14-00375-CV 5734354 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00375-CV 6136719 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/2

CIKLIN, C.J. Lucas Games, Inc. and Luc Marcoux, defendants below (“tenants”), appeal an order granting partial final summary judgment in favor of Morris AR Associates, LLC (“the landlord”) in a lease dispute. We find merit in one of the two issues raised by the tenants, namely that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against the tenants because the landlord failed to rebut the tenants’ affirmative defense of

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe

Cite as 2025 Ark. 71 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-226 Opinion Delivered: May 15, 2025 BOYLE VENTURES, LLC APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 04CV-22-2109] V. HONORABLE DOUGLAS SCHRANTZ, JUDGE CITY OF FA

Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge: Seven former participants in online discount membership programs allege violation of federal privacy statutes and a racketeering conspiracy between online retailers and loyalty club businesses to defraud customers of "membership fees" for rewards programs they unwittingly joined. They allege that Trilegiant Corporation ("Trilegiant") conspired with e-merchant retailers such as Buy.com, Orbitz, and Pri

411 F.3d 1051 Robert SPOKLIE, Individually; Spoklie Enterprises, L.L.C., a Montana Limited Liability Company; Kim J. Kafka, Esq.; Cindy R. Kafka, individually, and as husband and wife, and as members of Diamond K Ranch Enterprises, L.L.C.; Diamond K Ranch Enterprises, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.State of MONTANA; State of Montana, Department of Fish

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Chambers, J. ¶23 (concurring) — I fully concur with Justice Fairhurst’s measured, well reasoned majority opinion. I write separately, however, to stress that the same evils our legislature sought to avoid in decades past by regulating the debt adjustment industry still lurk. ¶24 As our legislature knew long ago, debt adjusting “is noted for its historic abuse and questionable practice and is outlawed or regu

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This action arises from the use of eight Beatles songs in the documentary film The Beatles: The Lost Concert {“The Lost Concert”). Specifically, Plaintiff Ace Arts, LLC (“Ace”) alleges that Defendants Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC (“SATV”) and Apple Corps Limited (“Apple”) unlawfully interfered with the United States distribution of

Filed 10/13/20; Modified and Certified for Pub. 11/12/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE RICHARD HALE BROWN, Plaintiff and Appellant, G058323 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2016-00881773) TGS MANAGEMENT COMPANY,