Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Our Town v. United States”
United States v. Town of Thornapple, Wisconsinpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2931 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOWN OF THORNAPPLE, WISCONSIN, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Teixeira v. Town of Coventrypublic domain
Affirmed.
22-2710 Citizens United To Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Village of Chestnut Ridge 122United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: May 4, 2023 Decided: April 5, 2024 No. 22-2710 CITIZENS UNITED TO PROTE
22-2710 Citizens United To Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Village of Chestnut Ridge United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: May 4, 2023 Decided: April 5, 2024 No. 22-2710 CITIZENS UNITED TO
protect our wildlife v. fish and wildlifepublic domain
Vermont Superior Court Filed 01/18 24 Washington nit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ”a"?
United States v. Town of Colorado Citypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-16472 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-08123- HRH TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, ARIZONA; TWIN CITY WATER AUTHORITY, INC., OPINION
Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Pete Buttigiegpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3190 PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of Transportation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the Unite
United States v. Town of Colorado Citypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-16472 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-08123- HRH TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, ARIZONA; TWIN CITY WATER AUTHORITY, INC., OPINION
Uphold Our Heritage v. Town of Woodsidepublic domain
54 Cal.Rptr.3d 366 (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 587 UPHOLD OUR HERITAGE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOWN OF WOODSIDE, Defendant and Appellant; Steven Jobs, Real Party in Interest and Appellant. No. A113376. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three. January 10, 2007. *369 Douglas Philip
Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. United Statespublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town ("AQTT") appeals several orders entered in favor of the United States, the Secretary and Associate Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior ("DOI"), the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation (the "Creek Nation"). Exercising jurisdiction under
protect our wildlife v. fish and wildlifepublic domain
VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit Case No. 24-CV-00189 65 State Street Montpelier VT 05602 802-828-2091 www.vermontjudiciary.org Protect Our Wildlife, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization et al v. Fish and Wildlife Board, an Agency of the State of Vermont et al
Save Our Access v. City of San Diegopublic domain
Filed 6/23/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAVE OUR ACCESS, D080071 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020- 00030308-CU-TT-CTL) CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Appellant.
Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Pete Buttigiegpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2449 PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of Transportation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. February 12, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Court a Samuel
Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Pete Buttigiegpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2449 PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of Transportation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal f
Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!public domain
239 P.3d 589 (2010) CITY OF PORT ANGELES, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent, v. OUR WATER-OUR CHOICE!, a Washington political action committee; Lynn Warber, campaign chair of Our Water-Our Choice!; Protect Our Waters, a Washington political action committee; and Ann Mathewson, Treasurer of Protect Our Waters, Petitioners, v. Washington Dental Service Foundation, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, A Party in Interest
United States v. Town of Oyster Baypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On April 10, 2014, the United States (the “Plaintiff”) commenced this action against *287the Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Supervisor John Venditto, in his official capacity (collectively, the “Defendants”). The Plaintiff asserts claims under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et s
Save Our Illinois Land v. Illinois Commerce Comm'npublic domain
FILED 2022 IL App (4th) 210008 January 12, 2022 Carla Bender NO. 4-21-0008 4th District Appellate Court, IL
City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!public domain
Chambers, J. ¶ 1 Public drinking water quality is highly regulated by the United States and Washington State governments. Extensive regulations dictate what may and may not appear in the water. But public drinking water is also, intrinsically, a matter of local concern and in this state is largely provided at the local level by municipalities and local water districts. *
Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Chicago Park Districtpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19-2308 & 19-3333 PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., and MARIA VALENCIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT and CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeals