Cases

04/09/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 12, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRANDON OTIS JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2015-D-2395 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________

Per Curiam. Appellant appears to argue that because he had the same attorney at trial and on direct appeal, the attorney had a “conflict of interest” in raising claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant does not identify any specific instances of ineffective assistance. Therefore, his argument seems to be that, whenever a defendant retains counsel on appeal, he or she is entitled to a finding of ineffectiv

52 F.3d 317 Otis Lee Terrellv.Willis E. Morton, Vernon Johnson, Lieutenant Loveman,Lieutenant Rochelle, Sergeant Dan Buskirk NO. 94-5361 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Feb 28, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-cv-05508, Thompson, J.

PER CURIAM: The issue in this appeal is whether habeas corpus relief should be governed by form or substance. The latter, of course, must control. The petitioner, Lee Otis Johnson, was indicted for burglary on October 10, 1974. His trial was scheduled to commence in the 174th Criminal District Court for Harr

JOHNSON, J. hln this appeal, Defendant seeks review of his convictions, claiming there was insufficient evidence to convict him. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Defendant’s convictions. ■ On July 10, 2015, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging Defendant, Otis D. Washington, with two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of La. R

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed December 28, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01165-CR CHADRICK OTIS HAVEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

68 F.3d 1283 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Patrick D. BRANTLEY, a/k/a "Red", Kenneth L. Rivers, a/k/a"Kenneth Johnson", Harold Brown, a/k/a "Otis LeeBrown", Bobby A. Bryant, a/k/a "BobbyAli Bryant", Orson O. Davis,Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Orson O. DAVIS, Bobby A. Bryant, a/k/a Bryant, Bobby Allen,Harold Brown, a/k/a Brown, Otis Lee, Kenneth L.Ri

Appeal quashed.

Mathias, Judge. Otis Sams (“Sams”) was convicted in Putnam Circuit Court of Level 4 felony possession of methamphetamine. Sams appeals, challenging the warrantless search and seizure of the evidence against him. We conclude that the State did not carry its burden to show that the inventory search of Sams’s truck was sufficiently regulated; therefore, we reverse.

469 F.2d 1396 Lee Otis JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellant. No. 72-2218. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1972. Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen., Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-a

ROBERTS, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Residential Advantage Development LLC and Matthew Avery (collectively “RAD”) appeal the Hinds County Chancery Court’s grant of the Ross family’s request for permanent injunctive relief.1 At issue is Lot 20, Block F of Beverly Heights, Part 2, located in Hinds County, owned by the Ross family, but upon which

675 F.Supp. 1137 (1987) Joan P. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. No. F 87-127. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. December 3, 1987. Barkan & Neff, Columbus, Ohio, Floyd Ramsier, Fort Wayne, Ind., for plaintiff. *1138 David H. Mil

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. The following language — appearing in a 1979 warranty deed — gives rise to this appeal: “The Grantee herein retains all mineral rights on said land and property.” (Emphasis added). The chancellor reformed the deed to reflect that the grantor retained all mineral rights. Although the chan

294 N.W.2d 848 (1980) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Robert Lee JOHNSON, Appellant. No. 49953. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 3, 1980. *849 C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, and Mary E. Steenson, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant. Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, County Atty., V

327 N.W.2d 580 (1982) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Paul C. JOHNSON, Appellant. No. 81-974. Supreme Court of Minnesota. December 23, 1982. *581 C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, and Mark F. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant. Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, County Atty.

08/29/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 7, 2017 Session RUFUS S. JOHNSON III v. ELAINA IRENE JOHNSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. MC-CC-CV-DN-14-407 Ross H. Hicks, Judge _______________________________

853 So.2d 856 (2003) James E. OTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2002-KA-00410-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. August 26, 2003. *858 Lesa Harrison Baker, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Jeffrey A. Klingfuss, attorney for appellee. EN BANC. IRVING, J., for t

Fecteau, J. Plaintiffs Kevin Lou (“Kevin”), his mother, Beilin Chen, and father, Jidoung Lou (collectively “Lou”) have brought this action against Otis Elevator Company (“Otis”) for injuries sustained by Kevin when he was four years old.2 While Otis’ original motion for summary judgment had been granted [14 Mass. L. Rptr. 649], the court granted reconsideration of this motion at Lou’s request; Lou ser

PITTMAN, Judge. Massey Asphalt Paving, Inc. (“Massey”), appeals from a judgment of the St. Clair Circuit Court, which determined that Massey did not hold a valid materialman’s lien on property owned by Lee Land Development, Inc. (“Lee Land”). We affirm. Procedural History Massey sued Lee Land, alleging that Massey and Lee Land had entered into an agreement pursuant to which

[This opinion was published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 39.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. OTIS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Otis, 1995-Ohio-223.] Appellate procedure—Application for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel— Application denied when applicant fails to establish good cause for failing to file within ninety days after journalization