Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 CERTIORARI KELVIA MUÑIZ DEL RÍO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Recurrida Instancia, Sala KLCE202401338 Superior de Arecibo v.

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to review the sentences of Samuel Roman, who pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and aiding and abetting, and Oscar Roman, who pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine base as well as carrying a firearm

In accordance with the directives of the North Carolina Supreme Court, the Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties prior to and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as: STIPULATIONS 1. Luis Alfredo Roman, deceased employee, (Roman) was killed at about midnight on April 7, 1994, at the Flying J Truck Stop in Gary, Indiana. 2. At the time of his death

GREENE, Judge. Southland Transportation Company (Southland) appeals from the North Carolina Industrial Commission’s (Commission) award of workers’ compensation benefits to the decedent Luis Roman (Roman), Mayra E. Roman, Isid E. Roman, Noemi E. Roman, Oscar A. Roman, and Jessica C. Roman (collectively, Plaintiffs). Roman began working as a long distance truck driver for Southland in January of 1994. Pursuant

515 S.E.2d 214 (1999) Luis ROMAN, Deceased Employee, Mayra E. Roman, Isid E. Roman, Noemi E. Roman, Oscar A. Roman, and Jessica C. Roman v. SOUTHLAND TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Employer; Riscorp of North Carolina, Carrier. No. 19A99. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 25, 1999. *215 Waggoner, Hamrick, Hasty, Monteith and Kratt, P

PLAINTIFF'S CROSS APPEAL AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CROSS APPEAL Deputy Commissioner Douglas E. Berger filed his Opinion and Award on August 9, 1996 wherein he found as fact the following: "17. At the time of his death, Luis Roman's average weekly wage was $516.18." In a letter dated August 16, 1996, the Defendant-Appellants gave proper notice of appeal to the Full Commission from the August 9, 1996 Opinion and Award, on behalf of the defendants

ACCEPTED 12-15-00001-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/22/2015 9:05:58 PM CATHY LUSK

Colón Birriel, Juez Ponente *948TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA I Andrés Román Velázquez (en adelante el “apelante”), solicita la revocación de una Sentencia dictada por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Arecibo (el “TPF), el 6 de diciembre de 2000 y archivada en los autos copia de su notificación el

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act § 516-a to vacate an acknowledgment of paternity, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Arias, J.), dated April 19, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for further proce

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act § 516-a to vacate an acknowledgment of paternity, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Arias, J.), dated April 19, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for further proce

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge. Defendant Ray Roman Marchan (hereinafter “Marchan” or “Defendant”) has filed a Motion [Doc. No. 118] and subsequently an Amended Motion for Acquittal, Arrest of Judgment, or in the Alternative Motion for New Trial [Doc. No. 119]. The Government has responded to both [Doc. No. 128] and Marchan has replied to that response in effect suppl

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-19-00484-CV SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc., Tercero Navarro, Inc., and Rodney R. Lewis, Appellants v. SAN ROMAN RANCH MINERAL PARTNERS, LTD.,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 23, 2019 No. 04-19-00484-CV SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc., Tercero Navarro, Inc., and Rodney R. Lewis, Appellants v. SAN ROMAN RANCH MINERAL PARTNERS, LTD.,

909 A.2d 760 (2006) 388 N.J. Super. 527 Beverly ROMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD and Louis A. Tenorio, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 13, 2006. Decided November 6, 2006. *761 Vincent Jesuele, Westfield, argued the cause for appell

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 23, 2019 No. 04-19-00484-CV SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc., Tercero Navarro, Inc., and Rodney R. Lewis, Appellants v. SAN ROMAN RANCH MINERAL PARTNERS, LTD.,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 30, 2019 No. 04-19-00484-CV SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc., Tercero Navarro, Inc., and Rodney R. Lewis, Appellants v. SAN ROMAN RANCH MINERAL PARTNERS, LTD.,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 10, 2019 No. 04-19-00484-CV SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc., Tercero Navarro, Inc., and Rodney R. Lewis, Appellants v. SAN ROMAN RANCH MINERAL PARTNERS, LTD.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 5, 2019 No. 04-19-00484-CV SEGUNDO NAVARRO DRILLING, LTD., Lewis Petro Properties, Inc., Tercero Navarro, Inc., and Rodney R. Lewis, Appellants v. SAN ROMAN RANCH MINERAL PARTNERS, LTD.,

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated July 22, 2015, which, after a *709 hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered October 5, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress