Cases

OPINION & ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief United States District Judge On June 28, 2011; petitioner Glen Rivera-Orta (“Rivera” or. “petitioner”) was convicted, after pleading guilty, of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine within 1,000 feet of a protected location, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B), 846 and 860. United States v. Glen Rivera-Orta, Crim. No. 07-547-14 (ADC) (D.P.R

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Glen Rivera-Orta pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiring to possess narcotics with intent to distribute. In due course, the district court imposed sentence. Although his plea agreement contained a waiver-of-appeal provision, the defendant nevertheless attempts to appeal. We enforce the waiver of appeal, reject a parallel ineffective assis

338 F.Supp.2d 272 (2004) Josue ORTA RIVERA Plaintiff v. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et als. Defendants No. CIV.03-1684 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 28, 2004. *273 Angel L. Morales-Rodriguez, Nicolas Nogueras-Cartagena, Nicolas Nogueras, Jr. Law Offices, San Juan, PR, for Josue Orta-

(2008) Grisel VAZQUEZ-ORTA, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil No. 08-1086 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 29, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Michael J. Astrue's (the "Commissioner") Motion to Dismiss. (Docket Nos

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII APELACIÓN procedente del FIDENCIA AMPARO Tribunal de Primera BONILLA SANCHEZ Instancia Sala Superior de S

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII JUAN ORTA CRUZ Apelación procedente del Apelante

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL GENERAL DE JUSTICIA TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X THE WOODS HOMEOWNERS Apelación ASSOCIATION procedente del DEMANDANTE(S)-APELANTE(S) Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL (VI) SASHA VALDÉS ORTA APELACIÓN procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelada KLAN202400444 Instancia, Sala de Guaynabo V.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V SAN CARLOS APELACIÓN MORTGAGE, LLC procedente del Apelante Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala V. KLAN202400187 Superior de

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 541 KAH 14-00042 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. RICKY ORTA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DALE ARTUS, SUPERINTENDENT, WENDE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FO

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Fidencia Amparo Bonilla Sánchez Peticionaria Certiorari v. 2026 TSPR 32 Oria F. Orta y otros 218 DPR ___ Recurridas Número del Caso: CC-2024-0793 Fecha: 30 de marzo de 2026 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Panel VII Representante legal de la parte peticionaria: Lcdo. José F. Gierbolini Bonilla

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), entered June 12, 2013 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, denied the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that Supr

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), entered June 12, 2013 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, denied the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that Supr

OPINION and ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are co-defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Docket #21), and plaintiffs’ opposition thereto (Dockets # 31). After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, co-defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Factual and Procedural Background

HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Sheila Reyes-Orta alleges that she was stripped of various job duties and was ultimately terminated from her job at the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) because of her affiliation with the Popular Democratic Party (“PDP”). After striking certain exhibits, the district court granted summary judgment against her on her Firs

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Apelacién ORLANDO REYES ORTA procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelante Superior de San Juan KLAN202500117 | Sobre: Vv. Despido Injustificado (Ley Num. 80 de 30 de mayo de 1976); THE CONDADO PLAZA Discrimen por Edad HILTON (Ley Num. 100 de 30 de junio de 1969); Procedimiento Apelada Sumario (Ley Num. 2 de 17 de octubre de 1961) Caso Num. SJ202 1CV07924 Panel integrado por su presidenta, la Juez Domin

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI JOSÉ RIVERA QUIÑONES REVISIÓN Administrativa Recurrente procedente del Departamento de v. Corrección y

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Dilean Reyes-Rivera was the mastermind of a Ponzi scheme, operated largely in Puerto Rico, which defrauded over 230 vulnerable people out of approximately $22 million. In 2012, he pled guilty to bank fraud and to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and in 2013 he was sentenced to concurrent terms of 60 months of imprisonment on the wire fraud conspiracy count

Opinión de conformidad emitida por la Juez Asociada Se-ñora Rodríguez Rodríguez, a la que se unen el Juez Aso-ciado Señor Estrella Martínez y la Jueza Asociada Oro-noz Rodríguez. Estoy conforme con la sentencia emitida por este Tribunal, mediante la cual se desestima la demanda de impug-nación del Sr. Luis O. Rodríguez Quintana. Sin embargo, considero necesario emitir algunas expre

Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Feliberti Cintrón. Por estar conforme con la Resolución y la Sentencia Enmendada emitidas por el Tribunal de Apelaciones el 12 de abril de 2013, y entender que los bienes privativos de los cónyuges responden subsidiariamente por deudas gananciales que hayan surgido como resultado de la conducta intencional grave de ambos, respetuosamente, disiento. Veamos.