Cases

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANA JANSEN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25 - 2961 (LLA) v. UNDER SEAL DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. SEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jana Jansen, proceedi

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1894L Filed: May 2, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ELIZABETH ORR, et al., * * * Plaintiffs, * * v.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PACITO; ESTHER; JOSEPHINE; Nos. 25-1313, SARA; ALYAS; MARCOS; 25-1939 AHMED; RACHEL; ALI; HIAS, INC.; CHURCH WORLD SERVICE, D.C. No. INC.; LUTHERAN COMMUNITY 2:25-cv-00255- SERVICES NORTHWEST, JNW Plaintiff

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1894L Filed: August 30, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ELIZABETH ORR, * HOWARD CARMAN, * and LENA CARMAN, * Takings; Motion to Dismiss;

631 F.Supp.2d 138 (2009) Michael ORR, Plaintiff, v. Michael MUKASEY, Defendant. Civil No. 06-1775 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 7, 2009. *141 PHV Leizer Z. Goldsmith, The Goldsmith Law Firm, LLC, Washington, DC, Manuel Porro-Vizcarra, Manuel Porro Vizcarra Law Office, Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiff. <

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH August 29, 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

617 F.Supp. 1443 (1985) HOLIDAY INNS, INC., A Tennessee corporation, and Harrah's Atlantic City, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Donald J. TRUMP, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. HARRAH'S INC., Third-Party Defendant. Civ. A. No. 85-2884. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 23, 1985. *1444

Puck, C.J. The refusal to charge as requested and the charge delivered to the jury, preseñt a question of much difficulty and importance arising under sections 90 and 98, of the “ act to provide for the settlement of the estates of deceased persons,” passed March 23,1840. 1 S. & C. 566. Section 98 provides, in substance, that no suit shall be instituted against the executor or administrator of an

Doe, J., dissenting. In the special plea, to which the plaintiff demurs, the defendant does not deny that he took the plaintiff’s property — Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R. Co., 51 N. H. 504, 511-516, Thompson v. Androscoggin R. I. Co., 54 N. H. 545; but he alleges that, acting as an agent of the United States, under and by virtue of certain acts of congress, he took it for the

60 F.3d 497 64 USLW 2073, 48 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 393,Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 43,518 LITTLE ROCK FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES, P.A.; Curtis E.Stover, M.D.; Fayetteville Women's Clinic; Tom Tvedten,M.D., on behalf of themselves and the Medicaid-eligiblewomen of the State of Arkansas to whom they provide healthcare, Appellees,v.Thomas DALTON, Director of the Arkansas Department of HumanS

149 Argued and submitted September 9, 2020, reversed and remanded August 3, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WAYLON K. PYLE, aka Waylon Karl Pyle, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 18CR51000; A169792

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 350 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-24-146 KIMBERLY RULOPH Opinion Delivered June 4, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT

November 25 2014 DA 14-0161 Case Number: DA 14-0161 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 310 GLEN AND JOHANNA WOHL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. CITY OF MISSOULA and

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES IN No. 25-2358 EAST PALO ALTO; SOCIAL JUSTICE D.C. No. COLLA

Opinion YEGAN, J. Retained counsel for an elderly person suffering from dementia must safeguard the well-being of the person and his or her financial resources. As we shall explain, here the attorney did neither. The probate court expressly indicated that counsel put his own financial interests ahead of the interests of his client. It surcharged counsel. We agree with the probate court’s ruling and its ratio

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 4 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JENNY LISETTE FLORES, No. 20-55951 Plaintiff-Appelle

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

TYSON, Judge, dissenting. *538I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion. Defendant has failed to show error in the superior court's ruling that the General Assembly has not constitutionally delegated its authority over rules and regulations adopted by the North Carolina State Board of Education ("State Board") to the Rules Review Co

310 Ga. 473 FINAL COPY S19G1612. QUYNN v. HULSEY et al. ELLINGTON, Justice. We granted certiorari in this wrongful death and personal injury case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that TriEst Ag Group, Inc., the employer of the driver whose truck struck and killed the decedent, was entitled to summary judgment on the estate’s claims of negligent entrustment, hiring, training, and supervision because TriEst admitted the applicability of res