Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 24-1532, 24-1614, 24-1734 WAYNE ORKIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, ARTHUR ORKIN, Plaintiff, v. LISA SUE ALBERT; IAN ALBERT, Defendants, Appellees, BOOST WEB SEO, INC., Third Party Plaintiff, Appe

FARMER, J. We affirm the trial court’s denial of plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict in this motor vehicle collision case. The record discloses evidence creating a conflict as to whether plaintiff suffered a permanent injury from the collision. In particular, defendant’s medical expert testified that plaintiffs rotator cuff injury could not have been caused by the accident. He explained that traumatic rotator cuff tears

313 Md. 508 (1988) 545 A.2d 1345 YILMAZ YAMANER v. IRENE RUTH ORKIN. No. 178, September Term, 1987. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 30, 1988. Albert D. Brault (Janet S. Zigler, Brault, Graham, Scott & Brault, all on brief), Rockville, for appellant. John J. Sellinger (Barry J. Nace, Paulson, Nace & Norwind, all on brief),

310 Md. 321 (1987) 529 A.2d 361 YILMAZ YAMANER v. IRENE RUTH ORKIN. No. 11 (Adv.), September Term, 1987. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 5, 1987. Albert D. Brault (M. Kathleen Parker and Brault, Graham, Scott & Brault on the brief), Rockville, for appellant. Barry J. Nace (Paulson, Nace & Norwind, on the brief), Washington

486 N.E.2d 1019 (1986) ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC. Appellant, (Defendant below), v. Charles TRAINA and Michelle Traina, Appellee, (Plaintiff below). No. 29S04-8601-CV-2. Supreme Court of Indiana. January 2, 1986. *1020 John P. Price, Jon D. Krahulik, Robin L. Babbitt, Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman, Indianapolis, for appel

PER CURIAM: Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

318 Md. 429 (1990) 569 A.2d 207 IRENE R. ORKIN v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL OF SILVER SPRING, INC. ET AL. No. 32, September Term, 1988. Court of Appeals of Maryland. February 7, 1990. John J. Sellinger (Barry J. Nace, Paulson, Nace, Norwind & Sellinger, all on brief), Rockville, for petitioner. David A. Levin (Michael T. Wharton, Digges,

SHIELDS, Judge, dissenting. I dissent. *705The majority affirms the punitive damage judgment even though it holds the Armstrong1 “clear and convincing” evidence rule applies to pure tort punitive damage cases and recognizes the rule has retrospective application under Don Medow Motors, Inc. v. Grauman,

521 S.W.2d 69 (1975) ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Albert R. WEAVER, Appellee. No. 74-311. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 7, 1975. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1975. *70 Coleman, Gantt, Ramsay & Cox, Pine Bluff, for appellant. Baim, Baim & Mullis, Pine Bluff, for appellee.

GRIM, District Judge. Defendant has moved for summary judgment in his favor, having averred in his answer to the Complaint that he was not the operator of the motor vehicle involved in the case and that the operator was not his agent. Defendant filed a “Request for Admission under Rule 36” asking plaintiff to admit that certain statements are true: (1) “On the date and at the time and place set forth in plaintiff’s complaint,

Jordan, Judge. This is a companion case to that of Thornton v. Orkin Exterminating Co., ante. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

223 Ga. 385 (1967) 156 S.E.2d 86 CITIZENS & SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK et al., Trustees v. ORKIN, by Next Friend, et al. 24073. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued May 9, 1967. Decided May 18, 1967. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1967. *387 George G. Finch, Ben Kohler, Jr., I. T

Jordan, Judge. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. In Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Thornton, 111 Ga. App. 636 (142 SE2d 422), decided May 3, 1965, the judgment of the Superior Court of Pierce County overruling the defendant’s traverse to the entry of service was reversed; and on May 28, 1965, the trial court entered an order making the remittitur from this court the judgment of the trial court and dism

431 F.2d 483 Mrs. Otto ORKIN and Mrs. Otto for the Mrs., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 29972 Summary Calendar.* United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 17, 1970. Appeal from Northern Distr

ELLIS, Judge. This rule is brought by the City of Hammond against Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. under R.S. 33:4784, to show cause why it should not be condemned to pay $390.00 in delinquent occupational license taxes, plus interest, penalties, and attorneys’ fees. Until the institution of this rule, Orkin was paying its occupational license tax on the basis of its gross annual receipts from business transacted by

117 So.2d 419 (1960) ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., a Florida Corporation; Orkin Exterminating Company of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Taft Pierce and Albert Snyder, Appellants, v. TRULY NOLEN, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee. No. 59-12. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District. January 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied F

PAT CANNON, Circuit Judge. This cause is before the court on the complaint of Truly Nolen, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Nolen”) and the answers of the corporate defendants Orkin Exterminating Company of South Florida, Inc. and Orkin Exterminating Company of Florida, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Orkin”) and the individual defendants Taft Pierce and Albert Snyder.

795 F.2d 238 55 USLW 2068, 1986-1 Trade Cases 67,182,5 Fed.R.Serv.3d 646,1 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 681 Irwin ABRAHAM; John Anderson; Thomas Baker; ArthurBalmes; Banwell, White & Arnold, Inc.; Christopher &Elizabeth Beirne; Joseph Blackburn; Bryan Brames; JamesA. Bunn; Richard & Sigrid Burns; Richard Butler; Ann B.Caulfield; Edwin F. & Joanne Cedilotte; Frederick Coholan;

—Yesawich Jr., J. Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered February 28, 1995 in Tompkins County, which granted the application of Holmberg, Galbraith, Holmberg & Orkin to determine and enforce its attorney’s lien. *856Attorneys Holmberg, Galbraith, Holmberg & Orkin (hereinafter the firm) were originally hi

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Michael Hulton and Penny Hulton, the sole heirs of Alfred Flechtheim - a renowned German Jewish art dealer and collector during the 1920s and 1930s - bring this suit against Freistaat Bayern (the "Free State of Bavaria" or "Bavaria") and Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen (the "Bavarian State Paintings Collections" or "BSGS," and together with Bavaria, "Defendants") for th