Cases

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, FOR PUBLICATION August 26, 2021 Petitioner-Appellant, 9:00

EDMONDS, P. J. Petitioner, a logging company, seeks review of an administrative order that found it in violation of safety regulations arising out of an inspection by the Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division (OR-OSHA) of its logging site. Petitioner argues that OR-OSHA’s citation that led to the findings was the result of an inspection that was unlawful under the applicable administrative rules, and that the citation

*925 Opinion CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: {1 Dr. Rodolfo Martinez-Ferrate challenges the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order entered by the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL) as amended and adopted by the Utah Department of Commerce (the Amended Order). Th

546 U.S. 243 (2006) GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. OREGON ET AL. No. 04-623. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 5, 2005. Decided January 17, 2006. *247 Solicitor General Clement argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Deputy So

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-3308 _____________________________ GLOBAL HOOKAH DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco. P

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: February 13, 2023 Refiled in Redacted Form: April 3, 2023 ************************* J. G., * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 20-664V * v. *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-761V (to be published) ************************* RAYMOND BIELAK, * * Chief Special Master Corcoran * Petitioner, * Fil

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-612V (to be published) ************************* ALAYNA MCDONALD, * * Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, * *

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Whenever accidental death occurs, it is human nature to place blame. During a massive construction project on the Milwaukee sewer system, three men died when methane gas located in the tunnel in which they had been working exploded. During the aftermath, the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) issued a citation to CH2M Hill Central, Inc. (“CH2M Hill”), the firm

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1136V Filed: January 19, 2022 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner CAROLYN PIERSON, Pneumococcal conjugate

219 Cal.App.3d 747 (1990) 268 Cal. Rptr. 476 JOHN F. HENNING, Individually and as Executive Secretary-Treasurer, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH, Respondent. Docket No. C006794. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. April 16, 1990. *750 COUNSEL Dona

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Labor petitions for review of a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (“OSHRC”) affirming an administrative law judge’s decision to vacate three, citations issued to respondent General Motors Corporation (“GM”) for violating 29 C.F.R. § 1910.147. We agree with OSHRC that the citations should be vacated

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-869V Filed: February 19, 2020 ************************* * * DIANE SOLAK, * * * TO BE PUBLISHED Petitioner, *

STEWART, Circuit Judge: Today we interpret the meaning of the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678). This case presents the question of whether the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) was correct when he decided to *1194 fine Arcadian Co

ACCEPTED 15-24-00114-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/29/2025 5:22 PM No. 15-24-00114-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-917V Filed: August 21, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * C.P., * To Be Published * * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Petitioner, *

SACK, Circuit Judge. Title 29 U.S.C. § 661(g), a part of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-78 (the “OSH Act” or the “Act”), provides that the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (the “Commission” or the “OSHRC”) shall, in the absence of a contrary rule adopted by the Commission, hold its proceedings “in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Proeedüre,” id. § 661(g). T

ACCEPTED 15-24-00052-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2025 7:51 PM No. 15-24-00052-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Labor (Secretary) seeks review of an order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission). Because the Commission erred in entertaining the employer’s untimely notice of contest, we reverse the decision of the Commission and hold that the Secretary’s citations should be affirmed. I

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-280V Filed: April 4, 2014 For Publication ************************************* DAVID D. GRIFFIN, * * Petitioner, * Dismissal decision; motion for summ