Cases

IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED May 30 2024, 11:37 am Supreme Court Case No. 23S-PL-130 CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge. Now before the Court are Motions to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim and a Motion to Strike brought by Defendants Energetix Holdings II, LLC (Holdings), and Mitch Miller (Miller). Plaintiff All Energy Corporation f/k/a All Fuels and Energy Company (All Energy) resists. No party has requested a hearing, and the Court finds that n

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS' DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Two petitions by the Federal Energy Commission (“FERC”) seeking affirmance *688of two of its orders assessing civil penalties have been pending before me. One petition (Case No. 13-cv-13056) seeks affirmance of a civil penalty against Lincoln Paper

USCA11 Case: 24-12682 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 05/18/2026 Page: 1 of 20 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-12682 ____________________ MOBILE BAYKEEPER, INC.,

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOREN MITCHELL LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER MAGISTRATE IN CHANCERY 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 August 29, 2025

KING, Circuit Judge: *329 The Petitioners in these proceedings - Dominion Energy, Inc., and its subsidiary Sedona Corp. - seek to appeal from two District of South Carolina orders remanding putative class action lawsuits to the South Carolina state courts. See Cit

OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court is the appeal of Hudson Energy Services, LLC (“Hudson”) from the Bankruptcy Court’s August 24, 2012 bench ruling and August 30, 2012 Order denying its request for administrative priority pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9). (Bankr. Docs. 3952, 3953).1 For the reasons that follow, the Bankruptcy Court’s Or

Opinion filed June 12, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00083-CV __________ DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P., Appellant V. MCCLURE OIL COMPANY, INC. AND FINA 945 L.C., Appellees AND DRIVER PRODUCTION, L.P. AND GRAHAM SONS

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0144p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FIRE-DEX, LLC, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1697, 23-1703 ERIC MOORE, Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL DEMOLITION LLC, Appellant, Cross-Appellee. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 15-3506, 15-3507, 15-3508, 15-3509, 15-3510, 15-3511, 15-3512, 15-3513, 15-3514, 15-3515, 15-3564, 15-3639, 15-3640, 15-3641, 15-3642, 15-3643, 15-3644, 15-3645, 15-3646, 15-3647, 15-3648, 15-3649, 15-3650, 15-3651, 15-3652, 15-3653, 15-3654, 15-3655, 15-3656, 15-3657, 15-3658, 15-3659, 15-3660, 15-4075, 15-4076, 15-4077, 15-4078, 16

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1490 (Filed Under Seal: February 13, 2023) (Reissued for Publication: February 28, 2023) 1 ************************************ * IXI TECHNOLOGY ELECTRONIC * WARFARE, LLC, dba, IXI EW, *

Jeffrey Cole, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Defendant, PPG, is a Forbes 500, multi-billion dollar, world-wide company, in the business of supplying paints, paint coatings, optical products, and specialty materials. Defendant, PPG Kansai Automotive Finishes U.S., LLC, is a joint venture between PPG Industries and Kansai Paint of Japan. According to the Complaint, the Plaintiff develops

Sontchi, J. *45INTRODUCTION 2 Before the Court is Defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to dismiss the Trustee's single-count Complaint seeking payment for services previously rendered. The Motion incorporates both factual and facial challenges to the Adversary Pr

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge This is the third motion to dismiss filed by the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) aimed at the first amended consolidated master class action complaint (FACMC) in this multidistrict litigation

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #058 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 19th day of December, 2024 are as follows: BY Crichton, J.: 2023-C-00788 BARBER BROTHERS CONTRACTING COMPANY, LLC VS. CAPITOL CITY PRODUCE COMPANY, LLC; FRANK CUSHENBERRY; AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY C/W FRANK CUS

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #032 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 28th day of June, 2024 are as follows: BY McCallum, J.: 2023-C-00788 BARBER BROTHERS CONTRACTING COMPANY, LLC VS. CAPITOL CITY PRODUCE COMPANY, LLC; FRANK CUSHENBERRY; AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY C/W FRANK CUSHENBERRY AND ROBIN CUSHE

HODGE, Chief Justice; CABRET, Associate Justice; and SWAN, Associate Justice. OPINION OF THE COURT (June 12, 2008) Karim Robles (“Robles”) sued his employer, HOVENSA, L.L.C. (“HOVENSA”), alleging that he was injured from exposure to hydrogen sulfide gas in the course of his employment. The Superior Court of the *493

Page 138 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL February 15, 2022 644 FEBRUARY, 2022 341 Conn. 644 Gonzalez v. O & G Industries, Inc. ELVIRA R. GONZALEZ ET AL. v. O & G INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. (SC 20422) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria,