Cases

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS; PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO TAX COSTS AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge. Pending before the Court are two motions for attorney’s fees filed by Plaintiffs Fred Pierce, et al.: the first was filed on July 31, 2009 and supplemented on August 12, 2011 (Docket Nos. 665, 793); and the *1023secon

638 F.3d 1111 (2010) Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-56306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 22, 2010. Filed December 22, 2010. *1112 Robert S. Coldren, Har

ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST

Filed 4/15/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN CARLOS CARACHURE et al., B336778 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. v. No. 22STCP03478) CITY OF AZUSA, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Super

410 F.Supp. 873 (1976) LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS and Lawrence Felix, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CV 74-767-F. United States District Court, C. D. California. March 12, 1976. As Amended March 22, 1976.

Filed 1/17/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, C093475 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2019

795 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2011) Mark STAMAS and Judy Castles, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MADERA, Board of Supervisors of the County of Madera, Gerald Houston, Linda Barlow, Defendants. Case No. CV F 09-0753 LJO SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 14, 2011. *1054 Michael Richard Johnson, Robert M. Dowd, Laura Anne Wol

610 F.Supp.2d 1129 (2009) David F. JADWIN, D.O., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF KERN; Peter Bryan (Both individually and in his former capacity as Chief Executive Of Kern Medical Center); Irwin Harris, M.D.; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-00026-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. April 8, 2009. *1

ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction On November 6, 2009, this court issued a summary order concerning plaintiffs motion to compel, and indicated that a more detailed order [and memorandum] would follow. The court will expand its analysis in two areas: 1. Production of internal affairs reports related

(2008) Lavette SANDERS, individually and as guardian ad litem for the estate of Michael Sanders, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF FRESNO a municipality; the County of Fresno, a municipality; Taser International, Inc. a corporation doing business in California; Jerry Dyer, an individual; Richard Paul Brown, an individual, Eloy Escaraneo, an individual, Jesse Herring, an individual, Beau Burger, an individual, and Does 5 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

81 Cal.Rptr.2d 93 (1999) 19 Cal.4th 952 968 P.2d 993 SANTA MONICA BEACH, LTD., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Santa Monica Rent Control Board, Real Party in Interest. No. S052824. Supreme Court of California. January 4, 1999. Certiorari Denied May 24, 1999.

(2008) KAMAOLE POINTE DEVELOPMENT LP; Alaku Pointe LP, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MAUI, Council Chair G. Riki Hokama; Council Vice-Chair Danny A. Mateo; Councilmember Michelle Anderson; Councilmember Gladys Coelho Baisa; Councilmember Jo Anne Johnson; Councilmember Bill Kauakea Medeiros; Councilmember Michael J. Molina; Councilmember Joseph Pontanilla; Councilmember Michael P. Victorino; Mayor Charmaine Tavares; Vanessa A. Medeiros, Director, Maui

Filed 12/22/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, C093475 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2019-8000-

173 Cal.App.2d 137 (1959) ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a Corporation), Respondent, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 5717. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Aug. 20, 1959. Leo A. Deegan and Albert H. Ford, City Attorneys (Riverside), Harry M. Dougherty, Deputy City Attorney, Cosgrove, Cramer, Diether & Rindge, Leonard A. Diether, Gor

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: This action involves claims by six individual firefighters against the City of Westminster (City) and ten individual defendants, each of whom was an officer and employee of the City. The City discharged four plaintiffs and disciplined the other two, after plaintiffs became embroiled in a bitter public controversy concerning the City’s funding of fire protection services, the

43 Cal.Rptr.3d 434 (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 629 LOS ALTOS EL GRANADA INVESTORS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CAPITOLA et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H027860. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. May 17, 2006. *436 Hart, King & Coldren, Robert C. Coldren, C. William Dahlin, Mark D. Alpert, San

9 Cal.4th 763 (1995) 889 P.2d 1019 38 Cal. Rptr.2d 699 RICHARD M. DeVITA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NAPA et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S037642. Supreme Court of California. March 6, 1995. *770 COUNSEL Gagen, McCoy, McMahon & Armstrong

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners, v. SHIRLEY N. WEBER, as Secretary of State, etc., Respondent; THOMAS W. HILTACHK, Real Party in Interest. S281977 June 20, 2024 Justice Liu authored the opinion of Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justices