Cases

OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Oracle Corporation and SAP AG are competitors in the enterprise software market. In 2007, Oracle et al. (collectively, “Oracle”) brought suit against SAP et al. (collectively, “SAP”) alleging that To-morrowNow, an enterprise software company recently acquired by SAP, was engaging in systematic and pervasive illegal dow

734 F.Supp.2d 956 (2010) ORACLE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. No. C 07-1658 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 17, 2010. *958 Donn P. Pickett, Bree Hann, Geoffrey M. Howard, Tanya King Dumas, Zachary J. Alinder, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Chad Lawrence Russell, Holly A. House,

(2008) ORACLE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. No. C-07-01658 PJH (EDL). United States District Court, N.D. California. July 3, 2008. ORDER OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL MASTER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING GRAND JURY DOCUMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN EMPLOYEES OF PARTIES ELIZABETH D. L

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PRECLUSION OF CERTAIN DAMAGES EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 37(C) (1) AND 16(F) ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(c) and 16(f), by which Defendants seek to preclude Plaintiffs from introducing evidence of damages due to lost pro

ORDER RE WILLFULNESS AND BIFURCATION WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION In this copyright-infringement action, defendant moves to preclude submitting the issue of willfulness to the jury unless and until plaintiff elects to pursue statutory'damages. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is Denied. This order further addresses procedural matters related

ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the court is plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc.; Oracle America, Inc.; and Oracle International Corporation’s (collectively “Oracle”) second motion for partial summary judgment addressing their first cause of action for copyright infringement; defendant Rimini Street, Inc.’s (“Rimini”) second, eighth, and ninth affirmative defenses; and Rimini’s first an

331 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, et al, Plaintiffs, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C 04-0807 VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 9, 2004. *1099 *1100 Claude F. Scott, Jr., Conrad John Smucker, J. Bruce McDonald, N. Scott Sacks, Assistant Chie

518 F.Supp.2d 344 (2007) William MELÉNDEZ, Plaintiff v. SAP ANDINA Y DEL CARIBE, C.A., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-1778 (ADC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 24, 2007. *345 *346 *347 William E. Melendez, San Juan, PR, pro se.</

MOORE, Circuit Judge. The present appeal arises from litigation in the District of Oregon between Mentor Graphics Corp. (“Mentor”) and Synopsys, Inc., Synopsys Emulation and Verification S.A;S., and EVE-USA, Inc. (“EVE”) (collectively, “Synopsys”). 1 Mentor asserted several patents against Synopsys, including U.S. Paten

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TECSEC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION AND EBAY INC., Defendants, AND CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., SAS INSTITUTE, INC., SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. (now known as Oracle America, Inc.), ORACLE CORPORATION, AND PAYPAL, INC., Defe

*925ON MOTION ORDER International Business Machines Corporation moves to dismiss its cross-appeal. Upon consideration thereof, It Is Ordered That: (1) The motion to dismiss 2011-1345 is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs in 2011-1345. (2) The revised official caption for 2011-130

PER CURIAM. JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants' Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that Claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 7,516,177 is Patent-Ineligible Under 35 U.S.C. § 1

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE, AND DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE HEARING DATE LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to strike Defendant’s expert reports and to preclude Defendant’s use of undisclosed evidence pursuant to Rule 37(c) (“Motion to Strike”). ECF No. 133. Plaintiffs also filed an administrative motion to expedite the hearing for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strik

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. Introduction In this copyright action involving kitchen design software, Real View has filed a motion to preclude the testimony of 20-20 damages expert Weston Anson (Doc. No. 279). After hearing, I find that Mr. Anson is qualified to render an opinion regarding the most likely form of a hypothetical license agreement between

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ECF No. 249. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs bring this putative class action on behalf of all participants, former participants, and beneficiaries of the Dignity Health Pension Plan ("the Dignity Plan" or "t

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS MICHAEL J. SENG, United States Magistrate Judge. I. FACTS AND ISSUES This is an excessive force/wrongful death case brought on behalf of Manuel Armenia, deceased, his widow and his children against the City of Fresno and two Fresno police officers. Fiona Raygoza proceeds as an individual Plaintiff, as successor

TARANTO, Circuit Judge. On remand from earlier holdings of this court, the Court of Federal Claims held that ten percent of $5.4 million in revenue (which was almost pure profit) was a reasonable royalty for the United States to *1366 pay as damages for its unauthorized use of a distinctive copyrig

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROY PAYAN; PORTIA MASON; No. 24-1809 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF D.C. No. THE BLIND, INC.; NATIONAL 2:17-cv-01697- FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF SVW-SK CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPINION

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VINCENT KEITH BELL, No. 22-16580 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01245-SI v. WILLIAMS, #6040; CITY AND OPINION COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendants-Appellants, and FISHER, #1152; LEUNG, #2019; ANTHONY BRYANT; JOHNSON BUI; ROBERT DALY; KRISTIAN DEJESUS; DENNIS WALSH; ROBERT YEUNG, Defend