⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Open Text S.A. v. Box, Inc.”

District Court, N.D. California · 2014-04-09 · Published · cited 6× · 36 F. Supp. 3d 885; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50581; 2014 WL 1389065
*889[Re: Docket No. 64] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Open Text S.A. (“Open Text”) brings this motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin Box, Inc. (“Box”) from “selling, offering to sell, licensing, offering to license, installing, offering for download
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-01-20 · Published · cited 9× · 78 F. Supp. 3d 1043; 114 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1717; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6309; 2015 WL 269036
ORDER GRANTING RULE 12(C) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF GROUPWARE PATENTS Re: Dkt. No. 295 JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge Defendant Box moves for judgment of invalidity on the pleadings on the grounds that plaintiff Open Text’s “Groupware” patents1 claim patent-ineligible subject matter. See Dkt. No. 295. The common specifica
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JESSICA GESSELE; ASHLEY No. 23-2522 ORTIZ; NICOLE GESSELE; D.C. No. TRICIA TETRAULT; CHRISTINA 3:14-cv-01092- MAULDIN, on behalf of themselves HZ and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellees, OR
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JESSICA GESSELE; ASHLEY No. 23-2522 ORTIZ; NICOLE GESSELE; D.C. No. TRICIA TETRAULT; CHRISTINA 3:14-cv-01092- MAULDIN, on behalf of themselves HZ and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellees,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-12-07 · Published · cited 3× · 226 F. Supp. 3d 190; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169375; 2016 WL 7156768
OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Virtually every invention could be described at a high level in a few words: “A method to provide answers to questions” for a search engine; “a tool to assist a user to draft documents” for a document-processing program; “a tool to remove a cork from a container” for a battery-operated wine-bottle opener; “a beverage container that does not leak wh
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018-10-30 · Published · cited 5× · 821 S.E.2d 110; 347 Ga. App. 889
Doyle, Presiding Judge. *889 Denis Weickert filed a negligence action against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., after he slipped and fell in water on the floor of the garden center in one of its stores. Weickert appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Home Depot, arguing that (1) he la
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-09-13 · Published · cited 60× · 209 F. Supp. 3d 612; 2016 WL 4784004
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge In this trademark lawsuit, two fashion companies go toe-to-toe over the right to affix a metal plate to the toe of “luxury” men’s sneakers. Plaintiff LVL XIII Brands, Inc. (“LVL XIII,” pronounced “Level 13”) is a New York start-up company that manufactures, markets, and sells men’s luxury athletic footwear. LVL XIII brings this action against defendan
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPEN TECHNOLOGY FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-1710 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MICHAEL PACK, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Director of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, Defendant.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2019-10-11 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00320-CV NO. 14-19-00321-CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.A.A.-G. AND J.S.A.-S., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 20
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-04-28 · Published · cited 1× · 131 Fed. Cl. 756; 2017 U.S. Claims LEXIS 401; 2017 WL 1534758
Bid Protest; Out-Grant Lease; Cancellation of Request for Proposals; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); 5 U.S.C. § 706; 10 U.S.C. § 2667; 41 U.S.C. § 111; Bad Faith. OPINION AND ORDER MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS, Judge Plaintiff Open Spirit, LLC (“Open Spirit”) protests the Navy’s cancellation of a solicitation for an out-grant lease (“Lease
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-09-11 · Published · cited 3× · 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 839; 15 Cal. App. 5th 153; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 788
REARDON, J. *156Plaintiff Claudia Johnson appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment for defendant Open Door Community Health Centers ("Open Door"), contending the trial court's application of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act's (MICRA) ( Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5 ) one-year statute of limitations for professional negligence wa
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-05-27 · Published · cited 28× · 188 F. Supp. 3d 22; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69621; 2016 WL 3034150
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge This long-running dispute between Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Paleteria La *27 Michoacana, Inc, and Paleteria La Michoa-cana (Sub), Inc. (collectively;, and together with their predecessors
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013-05-08 · Published · cited 1× · 110 Fed. Cl. 747; 181 Oil & Gas Rep. 471; 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 435; 2013 WL 1912246
Breach of Contract; Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. No. 95-91 (1977); Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-106 (1996); Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-258 (1976); Privileged Documents; Reliance Damages; Sanctions for “Bad Faith” Conduct During Discovery; Pub. L. No. 105-261 (1998); Restatement (Seoond) of Contracts §§ 344(b)
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2026-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
RENDERED: APRIL 23, 2026 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2023-SC-0524-DG KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND APPELLANT WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NOS. 2022-CA-0170 & 2022-CA-0192 FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT NO. 21-CI-00680
California Court of Appeal · 2017-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/11/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CLAUDIA A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, A143992 v. OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HEALTH (Humboldt County CENTERS, Super. Ct. No. DR130620)
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2012-02-09 · Published · cited 34× · 359 S.W.3d 318; 2012 WL 112241
359 S.W.3d 318 (2012) EDITORIAL CABALLERO, S.A. DE C.V. and Grupo Siete International, Inc., Appellants, v. PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee. No. 13-10-00586-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. January 12, 2012. Rehearing Overruled February 9, 2012. *323 Andy Taylor, Amanda Peterson, Andy T
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 54 F. Supp. 3d 776; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150927; 2014 WL 5371038
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs I.E.E. International Electronics & Engineering, S.A. and IEE Sensing, Inc. (collectively “IEE” or “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action in this Court in September of 2010, alleging that Defendants TK Holdings Inc. (“TKH”)' and Ta-kata A.G. (“TKAG”
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-09-24 · Published · cited 0× · 892 F. Supp. 2d 557; 2012 WL 4372886; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138171
MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Plaintiff John Eastcott, a professional photographer and the inventor of U.S. Patent No. 5,592,331 (“the '331 patent”), brings suit against defendants Hasselblad A/S, Hasselblad USA Inc, (collectively “Hasselblad”) and B & H Photo & Electronics Corp. (“B & H”). Eastcott alleges that Hasselblad’s HTS 1.5 adapter (the “HTS 1.5 adapter”)
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-09-25 · Published · cited 24× · 69 F. Supp. 3d 175; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135130; 2014 WL 4759945
Re Document Nos.: 114, 116, 119, 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Defendant’s Motion to Strike; and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion In Limine RUDOLPH CONTRERAS,
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019-05-09 · Published · cited 17× · 600 B.R. 237
MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *243I. INTRODUCTION On December 7, 2018, Andrew Childe (the "Foreign Representative" or "Petitioner") commenced the jointly administered Chapter 15 Cases and sought this Court's recognition of the joint judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial