⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Omar Theodore Duncan”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-995L Filed October 9, 2018 ) DUANE OMAR BURNETT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment ) Takings; National Trails System Act; v.
Poe v. Drummondpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-04-01 · Published · cited 163× · 954 F.3d 502
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 314× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 32 A.D. 239; 52 N.Y.S. 1019; 1898 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1745
Hatch, J.: The 'complaint sets -forth an action at law, averring the breach of a contract in writing, and demands judgment for money damages on account of such breach. The cause of action is peculiar only in the fact that the subject-matter of the action and of, the contract has relation to a cemetery, and in its disposition we are-compelled to consider the existence of three corporations, their relation to each other, the le
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F. App'x 305
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 61 F. App'x 690
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On