Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA OLYMPIC AND GEORGIA PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant. S280000 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B312862 Los Angeles County Superior Court BC707591 August 2

Filed 4/7/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT OLYMPIC AND GEORGIA B312862 PARTNERS, LLC, Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC707591 v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant. CIRCU APPEAL from a judgment of the

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 15, 2022 S21G0798. EDIBLE IP, LLC v. GOOGLE, LLC. MCMILLIAN, Justice. This case involves Google LLC’s application of internet search algorithms, which it uses to auction off search terms for profit to advertisers, and the interests of Edible IP, LLC, which seeks to exercise control over the profit generated from its trade name and associated goodwill. In 2018, Edible IP brought an ac

Doyle, Presiding Judge. *132 This appeal arises out of claims filed by Ephraim Green against Pateco Services, LLC, and others, alleging that Pateco was responsible for reporting hazards in the common area where Green's foot slipped into an open water meter causing him to spill hot oil on his

Filed 8/25/22; Certified for Publication 9/12/22 (order attached) Opinion following transfer from Supreme Court IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT RAQUEL BETANCOURT, B293625 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC629916) v. OS RESTAURANT SE

Filed 4/30/20; Certified for Publication 5/21/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT RAQUEL BETANCOURT, B293625 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC629916) v. OS RESTAURANT SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants and Appel

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-2848 ______________ HOST INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant v. MARKETPLACE, PHL, LLC, ______________ On Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02036) Dis

Ray, Judge. This appeal arises from a premises liability claim filed by Joe Wayne Bright1 against Sandstone Hospitality, LLC, and Wingate International Inns, Inc. Bright sued after he sustained injuries from a fall that occurred while he was a guest at a hotel owned by Sandstone and franchised by Wingate. The trial court, in two orders, granted Sandstone and Wingate’s respective motions for summa

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ October 31, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A23I0062. SUNRISE COMMERCE HOTEL GROUP, LLC v. PRIMAX PROPERTIES, LLC et al. Sunrise Commerce Hotel Group, LLC (“Sunrise Commerce”) filed a complaint against Primax Properties, LLC, Bojangles’ Restaurants, Inc., and two additional parties for nuisance and

On April 12, 2018, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. McCormack, J. (concurring). The equitable principle of estoppel is many centuries old. Un

MEMORANDUM Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the two-count First • Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) filed on March 1, 2017 by judgment creditor Premier Capital, LLC (“Premier”) against the Chapter 7 debtor, Maurice B. Wyman (“Maurice”), the brother of his business partner, Michael P. Wyman (“Michael”), who is also a Ch

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0156p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MAX RACK, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EAGLE FORCE HOLDINGS, LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) and EF INVESTMENTS, LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. 10803-VCMR ) v. ) ) STANLEY V. CAMPBELL, )

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EAGLE FORCE HOLDINGS, LLC, ) and EF INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No. 10803-VCMR v. ) ) STANLEY V. CAMPBELL, ) ) Defendant. )

OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: In 2004, California passed legislation to prohibit the practice of force-feeding ducks or geese to produce foie gras, an expensive delicacy made from their liver. California determined that the force-feeding process, which typically involves inserting a 10- to 12-inch

ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2011 FED App. 0014P (6th Cir.) File Name: 11b0014p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: SOUTHEAST WAFFLES, LLC, ) ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) SOUTHEAST WAFFLES, LLC, )

460 B.R. 132 (2011) In re SOUTHEAST WAFFLES, LLC, Debtor. Southeast Waffles, LLC, Appellant, v. United States Department of Treasury/Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. BAP No. 11-8012. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 1, 2011. Decided and Filed: November 30, 2011. *134

OPINION TIMMER, Judge. ¶ 1 These consolidated appeals stem from three consolidated lawsuits concerning a construction dispute among a property owner, a tenant, a general contractor, and six subcontractors involved in improving restaurant space at a Paradise Valley, Arizona resort. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC (“Smoke Tree”), the owner of the property, appeals from superior court judgments awarding damages to si

439 F.Supp.2d 281 (2006) SMJ GROUP, INC., Cieli Partners, L.P., Brooklyn Diner USA, L.P., Plaintiffs, v. 417 LAFAYETTE RESTAURANT LLC, The Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York, Inc., John Does 1-58, John Roes 1-50, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 1774(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 6, 2006. *282

506 F.3d 333 (2007) THE LAST BEST BEEF, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan W. DUDAS, in his official capacity as Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Lynne G. *334 Beresford, in her official capacity as the Commissioner for Trademarks for the United States, Defendants-Appellants. No. 06-2219.