Cases

188 Wis.2d 25 (1994) 523 N.W.2d 578 Phillip W. OLSON, and Randal F. Konichek, Plaintiffs-Appellants,[†] v. 3M COMPANY, Maynard Schultz, City of Prairie Du Chien, Prairie Du Chien Police Department, Gary R. Knickerbocker, Terry J. Zinkle, and Hartford Insurance Group (ITT Hartford), Defendants-Respondents. No. 93-2418. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

(2008) THERMODYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07 CV 2491. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. December 17, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are a number of motions. Plaintiff Thermodyn Corporati

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3M COMPANY, INC. et al., IN RE; ASBESToS LITIGATloN= ) ) LARRY CECIL STURGILL and ) JILL STURGILL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. NO. N15C-12-188 ASB ) v- ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: October 5, 2017 Decided: Decemberl 1, 2017 Upon Defendant Union Carbide Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED. ORDER David W. deBruin, Esquire, The deBruin Firm LLC, 1201 North Orange Street, Suite 500, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attorney for Plaintiffs, Larry

Tippin v 3M Co., Alcat (2024 NY Slip Op 06679) Tippin v 3M Co., Alcat 2024 NY Slip Op 06679 Decided on December 31, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<

461 F.Supp.2d 710 (2006) Terry OLSON, Denny L. Robinson, and Albert Simon, Plaintiffs, v. JENKENS & GILCHRIST, a Texas, Professional Corporation; Jenkens & Gilchrist, an Illinois Professional Corporation; Paul M. Daugerdas and Spouse; Donna Guerin and Spouse; Erwin Mayer and Spouse; Deutsche Bank Ag; Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. d/b/a Deutsche Bank Alex Brown, a Division of Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.; Timmis & Inman LLP; George

DECISION The Defendant, Homasote Company ("Homasote"), moves for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56. Homasote asserts that no issue of material fact exists, and such motion should be granted. The Plaintiff, Joseph LaPointe ("Mr. LaPointe"), objects to the motion. Facts and Travel Mr. LaPointe filed a complaint in this Court on May

513 F.Supp.2d 322 (2007) BRADBURN PARENT TEACHER STORE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY). Civil Action No. 02-7676. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 14, 2007. *323 *324 Charles M. Jones, Jones Ost

2020 WI App 69 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP1872 Complete Title of Case: CITY OF STOUGHTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ERIK J. OLSON AND CARTER J. SMITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Opinion Filed: September 3, 2020 Submitted on

ACCEPTED 15-25-00067-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/19/2025 11:09 AM No. 15-25-00067-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________

SACK, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff, Paula Konikoff, a real estate appraiser, brought a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). Prudential is the manager of two real-estate funds, PRISA and PRI-SA II (the “Funds”), for which Konikoff had provided appraisal services. Konik

259 F.Supp. 35 (1966) STATE OF MICHIGAN and all Related Cases Pending in the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division, Plaintiffs, v. MORTON SALT COMPANY et al., Defendants. Nos. 4-64-Civ. 423, 4-64-Civ. 422, 4-65-Civ. 1, 4-65-Civ. 197, 4-65-Civ. 388, 4-65-Civ. 398 to 4-65-Civ. 400, 4-65-Civ. 402, 4-66-Civ. 17, 4-66-Civ. 69, and 4-66-Civ. 138. United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.</

705 N.E.2d 938 (1999) 302 Ill. App.3d 236 235 Ill.Dec. 755 LA SALLE NATIONAL BANK, n/k/a La Salle National Bank, N.A., as Trustee, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. Carlyn J. MALIK, Indiv., et al., Defendants and Counterplaintiffs (Carlyn J. Malik et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees; Kiannosh Jafari et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees; Swissler Brothers Plumbing, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-1361 ___________________________ Ewan Leask Plaintiff - Appellant v. City of Minneapolis; Jeffrey Pennaz, Minneapolis Police Officer, in his individual

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS

PER CURIAM. Edward Martin McKenna, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and denying relief on his copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKenna v. Lee, No. CA-00-911-BR (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA GREGORY KISLING, ) ) Supreme Cour

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N23C-05-045 MAA CCLD XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NATIONAL UNION FIRE ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) PITTSBURGH, PA., BERKLEY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, QBE ) INSURANCE CORPORATION, ) MIDVALE IN

*263OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. This case arises from an antitrust action brought by ZF Meritor, LLC (“ZF Meritor”) and Meritor Transmission Corporation (“Meritor”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”) for allegedly anticompetitive practices in the heavy-duty truck transmissions market. The practices at issu

Filed 7/6/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MALEKEH KHOSRAVAN, B307482 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV20678) v. CHEVRON CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Ange

KLOPPENBURG, J.1 ¶ 1. The circuit court dismissed a citation, issued to Michael Crute under Wis. Admin. Code § Adm 2.14(2)(vm)5., for participating in an unpermitted sing-along in the State Capitol rotunda.2 The circuit court concluded that the rule was unconstitutional. According to the circuit court, the rule "violates the First Amendment because it applies, on its face,