⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Old LC, Inc. v. Doe”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1614 Doc: 52 Filed: 06/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1571 GARTEN TRUCKING LC, Petitioner, and ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN PULP AND PAPER WORKERS, Intervenor, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS B
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-06-02 · Published · cited 5× · 139 F.4th 269
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1571 Doc: 62 Filed: 06/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1571 GARTEN TRUCKING LC, Petitioner, and ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN PULP AND PAPER WORKERS, Intervenor, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS B
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 30× · 105 F.4th 1300
Appellate Case: 23-4001 Document: 010111072149 Date Filed: 06/28/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 28, 2024 UN
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-01-11 · Published · cited 17× · 679 F. Supp. 2d 454; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1833; 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,800; 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 375; 2010 WL 93109
679 F.Supp.2d 454 (2010) ROHN PADMORE, INC. and Ron H. Padmore, Plaintiffs, v. LC PLAY INC. d/b/a/ LaQue Clothing and Erastus Pratt, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 0498(PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 11, 2010. *456 Stewart Law Firm, Nadira S. Stewart, Esq., Rosedale, NY, for Plaintiffs. Sandback, Birnb
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 690 S.W.3d 166; 2024 Ark. App. 352
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 352 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-22-823 Opinion Delivered May 29, 2024 APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON DOWELL ROAD, LLC COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANT
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2020-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-19-00198-CV __________________ LEON KARLINSKI AND GAIL KARLINSKI, Appellants V. TEXAS LANDING UTILITIES, LC, DORANNE BAKER, AND JEFFREY BAKER, Appelle
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-10-12 · Published · cited 2× · 322 F.R.D. 436
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiff Parker Waichman LLP (“Parker”)’s motion for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). (Docket No. 150.) Parker requests that the Court reconsider its Opinion and Order granting the dismissal of Parker’s claim for specific performance. See Docket No. 142. Parker also seeks
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D21-1809 LT Case No. 05-2014-CA-41947 WATERS MARK DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISE
Utah Supreme Court · 2015-07-17 · Published · cited 14× · 2015 UT 55; 355 P.3d 965; 791 Utah Adv. Rep. 25; 2015 Utah LEXIS 188; 2015 WL 4381065
Associate Chief Justice LEE, opinion of the Court: T1 Orlando Millenia was a lender on a multi-million dollar real estate transaction. It filed this suit alleging that United Title breached its fiduciary duty as an escrow agent in the transaction at issue. And it also asserted claims for vicarious liability against Stewart Title and First American Title unde
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-09-08 · Published · cited 2× · 552 B.R. 826; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120119; 2015 WL 5261138
ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT OF BANKRUPTCY COURT BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge Appellant True Traditions, LC (“Appellant” or “TT”) appeals the judgment of the bankruptcy court avoiding a fraudulent conveyance of real property located at 415-417 Tehama Street, San Francisco, California (“Tehama Property”)- For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED. I.
Nevada Supreme Court · 2020-12-23 · Published · cited 1× · 477 P.3d 368
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA THE HARVEST FOUNDATION, LLC, A No. 79333 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, FILED vs. ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE DEC 2 3 2020 ASSOCIATION, LC, A NEVADA ELIZABETH A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-04-13 · Published · cited 2× · 59 So. 3d 275; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200; 2011 WL 1445080
EMAS, J. Appellant, the plaintiff below, appeals an order dismissing with prejudice its second amended complaint. We review the trial court’s ruling de novo, Morin v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 963 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), and, accepting as true the well-pled allegations of the operative complaint, affirm in part and reverse in part. I. INTRODUCTION In 2003, G
Utah Supreme Court · 2011-11-15 · Published · cited 19× · 270 P.3d 430; 2011 UT 71; 695 Utah Adv. Rep. 27; 2011 Utah LEXIS 165; 2011 WL 5865390
INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 This appeal is rooted in a dispute over a parcel of land situated between adjoining landowners, Steven Kay and Essential Botanical Farms, LC (EBF). Mr. Kay is the record owner of the property, but EBF and its predecessors-in-interest have occupied the property for nearly fifty years. The district court quieted title to the property in favor of EBF on cross-motions for summary judgment after finding that the parties' predecessors-in-i
Utah Supreme Court · 2013-11-19 · Published · cited 7× · 2013 UT 69; 420 P.3d 1052; 2013 Utah LEXIS 194
Justice DURHAM, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 Appellants Delta Canal Company, Melville Irrigation Company, Abraham Irrigation Company, Deseret Irrigation Company, and Central Utah Water Company (collectively, Irrigation Companies) and Appellee Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LC (Vincent) are water-rights holders on the Sevier River syste
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2025-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ALAN LARES, FOR PUBLICATION March 26, 2025 Plaintiff-Appellant,
in Re Baby Boy Doepublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2021-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re BABY BOY DOE, Minor. PETER KRUITHOFF, FOR PUBLICATION August 26, 2021 Petitioner-Appellant, v
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ALTICOR, INC., FOR PUBLICATION May 22, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9:05 a.m. v No. 337404 Court of Claims DEPARTMENT OF TR
John Doe v. Roepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 3× · 295 F. Supp. 3d 664
T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiff, John Doe ("Doe"), brings this action against Jane Roe ("Roe") and Marymount University ("Marymount"), asserting several causes of action arising from plaintiff's suspension from Marymount following Roe's allegations of sexual assault.1 *667Sp
Matter of LCpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995-12-12 · Published · cited 7× · 659 N.E.2d 593; 1995 WL 729496
659 N.E.2d 593 (1995) In the Matter of L.C., a Minor Child. Lawrence T. NEWMAN and Beverly R. Newman, Appellants-Respondents, v. WORCESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellee-Petitioner. No. 49A05-9405-CV-194. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 12, 1995. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1996. *595 L
Lc v. Adpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 1997-10-23 · Published · cited 5× · 971 S.W.2d 512; 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 5552; 1997 WL 657050
971 S.W.2d 512 (1997) L.C., Appellant, v. A.D., Appellee. No. 05-92-02867-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. October 23, 1997. Debra E. Hunt, Moore & Hunt, Houston, for Appellant. *513 B. Prater Monning, III, Monning & Wynne, L.L.P., Dawn E. Estes, Gardere & Wynne, L.L.P., Dallas, for Appellee. Befor