Cases

653 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2009) The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BLUE TEE CORP., et al., Defendants. Case No. 03-CV-0846-CVE-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. September 2, 2009. *1169 Joseph H. Bates, III, Carney Williams Bates Bozeman & Pulliam PLLC, Little *1170

2006 OK 23 STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant, v. FRANKLIN J. PACENZA, FOR OFFICIAL Respondent. SCBD #4983 Supreme Court of Oklahoma April 18, 2006 Mike Speegle, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Complainant, William Hall, Bartlesville, Oklahoma, for Respondent. WATT, C.J.:

MORENO, District Judge: This consolidated appeal arises from six district court actions in this circuit. In each of the six cases, the district court ruled in favor of the Appellees, the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (collectively referred to as the “feder

*318Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. Federal law prohibits corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds to make independent expendi*319tures for speech defined as an “electioneering communication” or for speech expressly advocating the election or defeat of a

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Under the Federal Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 (“the Mine Safety Act”), the Secretary of Labor is charged with protecting the health and safety of the nation’s miners, acting through the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”). Regulations issued under the Mine Safety Act require mine operators to report to MSHA all mine-related in

162 F.3d 678 333 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 1998-2 Trade Cases P 72,381,14 Communications Reg. (P&F) 770 BELLSOUTH CORPORATION, et al., Appellants,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee.AT&T Corporation, et al., Intervenors. No. 98-1019. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Sept. 25, 1998.

467 F.Supp.2d 40 (2006) CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-00806 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 12, 2006. *41 *42 *43

Robert L. Brown, Justice. Tbis case involves the assessment of the ad valorem property tax by the Tax Division of the appellee Arkansas Public Service Commission (APSC) in 1995 and 1996, and specifically raises the question of whether $20.8 million in exit fees should have been taxed. The property assessed was a natural gas pipeline owned by appellant Ozark Gas Pipebne Corporation which extends from Pittsburg

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM1: Table of Contents I. Introduction. . 681 II.FERC’s AuthoRity to Require Open Acoess. M OO CO A. Statutory Challenges: FPA §§ 205 and 206 . lO OO CO 1. §§ 205 and 206 and Otter Tail Power Company. lO OO CO 2. § 206(a) Procedural and Evidentiary Requirements. cOO CO

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM1: Table of Contents I. Introduction....................................................... 165 II. FERC’s Authority to Require Open Access ........................... 167 A. Statutory Challenges: FPA §§ 205 and 206 ......................... 169 1. §§ 205 and 206 and Otter Tail Power

This suit was filed by the petitioner, J.W. Payne, against the City of Houston and others to restrain the enforcement of a city ordinance regulating the operation of taxicabs within the city limits of Houston and for a declaratory judgment fixing the rights, status and other legal relations between the petitioner and the city. Houston is a home rule city, duly incorporated and operating as such under the constitution and statutes of this state. The petitioner alleged that for ma

56 F.3d 151 312 U.S.App.D.C. 187 TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L.P., et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States ofAmerica, Respondents,Nynex Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 93-1723, 93-1727, 93-1729, 93-1730, 94-1066, 94-1354,94-1355, 94-1366, 94-1367, 94-1375-94-1378, 94-1380,94-1382, 94-1400, 94-1401, 94-1407, 94-1408,94-1432-94

LANGDON, Chief Justice. This is an appeal growing out of an action for declaratory judgment brought by the State Highway Commission, appellee herein, against appellant, D. C. Hall Company, a Delaware corporation with authority to do business in Texas; and Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc., a Texas corporation. Both corporations do business in Texas and each has designated 201 Ray-nolds Boulevard, in the City of El Paso, El

OPINION WATT, J.: T1 The question before the Court is whether the Respondent, City of Ada, Oklahoma, fully complied with the Oklahoma annexation statutes when it annexed certain territory near its city limits. At issue is the construction of 11 0.8.2011 § 21-103(A) 1 and (B)(2)2 and whether substantial compliance with the notice and consent prov

42 F.3d 181 63 USLW 2348, 1994-2 Trade Cases P 70,814 The CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA;Bell Atlantic Video Services Company; Bell AtlanticCorporation; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company; C &P Telephone Company of Maryland; the Chesapeake and PotomacTelephone Company of West Virginia; the Diamond StateTelephone Company; the Bell Telephone Company ofPennsylv

OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGES Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only </

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. James Ferrell checked into the emergency room at a hospital in Warren, Arkansas, experiencing chest pain. Staff arranged for Air EVAC EMS, Inc. (Air EVAC), an air-ambulance operator, to transport him by helicopter to another hospital forty-one miles away. A few months after the transport, Air EVAC sent Ferrell a bill for $30,083.26. His insurer, Arkansas Blue Cr

WATT, J.; {1 Robert Samuel Kerr, IV ("Kerr") entered an Alford plea to a misdemeanor charge of obstruction of a public officer on April 5, 2012. He was immediately suspended by the Oklahoma Bar Association ("Bar") and directed to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be imposed or present mitigating evidence, The Professional Responsibility Tribunal ("Tribunal") held a hearing on July 80, 2012. After conduc

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. This matter presently comes before the Court on the following motions: the State defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. # 36); the Board defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc. ## 38, 88); the motion to dismiss or stay filed by the Board defendants and intervenors (Doc. # 90); plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 28); and pla

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOEL B. RITCHIE, Derivatively On ) Behalf Of CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0102-BWD ) G. LEONARD BAKER, JOSEPH K. ) BELANOFF, SEAN MADUCK, ) DAVID L. MAHONEY, CHARLES ) ROBB, DANIEL N. SWISHER, and ) JAME