⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Ohio Learning Centers, LLC v. Sylvan Learning, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-04-04 · Published · cited 102× · 675 F.3d 538; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6745; 2012 WL 1109634
675 F.3d 538 (2012) Gregory M. NOLFI, as Successor Trustee under the Frederick E. Nonneman Declaration of Trust Dated August 19, 1994, as Amended; Anita C. Nonneman, as Executrix of the Estate of Deceased Frederick E. Nonneman; Rena Nonneman, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. OHIO KENTUCKY OIL CORPORATION; Carol L. Campbell, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Deceased William M. Griffith, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-12-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 Ohio 5275
[Cite as Henderson v. SMC Prods., Inc., 2019-Ohio-5275.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY John Henderson, et al. Court of Appeals No. E-18-003 Appellants Trial Court No. 2009-CV-0576 v. SMC Productions, Inc., et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-08-13 · Published · cited 1× · 120 F. Supp. 3d 1028; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106932; 2015 WL 4873542
ORDER GRANTING IN ■ PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT LEE SONNIER’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [67] STEPHEN V. WILSON United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case arises from Plaintiffs’ investments in oil, gas, and mineral royalty and leasehold interests (“OGM Royalty Interests”) — allegedly made with and through Defendants. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants’ sl
District Court, D. Maryland · 2013-10-24 · Published · cited 2× · 983 F. Supp. 2d 632; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153110; 2013 WL 5781580
MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Ledo Pizza System, Inc. and Ledo Pizza Carryouts, Ltd. (together “Ledo”) sued Tri-Bro, Inc. (“Tri-Bro”) and Inderjit Singh for violations of the Lanham Act, and other claims. ECF No. 1. Pending is Ledo’s motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 2. On October 22, 2013, the Court held a hearing on the motion; no defendant opposed the m
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-04-26 · Published · cited 18× · 67 F.4th 550
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-3234 ______________ JASWINDER SINGH, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, Appellant v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ______________ No. 21-3
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-3234 ______________ JASWINDER SINGH, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, Appellant v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ______________ No. 21-3
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015-06-02 · Published · cited 20× · 531 B.R. 439; 2015 WL 3465752
SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING OMNIBUS MOTIONS TO DISMISS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: -- Defendants in 233 adversary proceedings identified in an appendix to this opinion have moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), (2) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss complaints filed by Irving H.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-04-03 · Published · cited 10× · 508 F. Supp. 2d 601; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25586; 2007 WL 1100804
508 F.Supp.2d 601 (2007) UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, v. LaFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant, Counterplaintiff, and LaFarge S.A., Daniel C. Myslinski, David Downs, John D. Yockey, Tom Huffer, Charles Jett, Ed Green, William Hartford, Walter Weldon, Kurt F. Kruzshak, and Sidney Spear, Defendants. No. 03 C 6027. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Div
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 Ohio 1216
[Cite as Jori, L.L.C. v. B2B Internatl., L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-1216.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO JORI, LLC, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2016-L-123 - vs -
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-04-07 · Published · cited 24× · 1 F. Supp. 3d 319; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47518
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOB CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE RELEASE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. *331I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND . CO A. Allstate’s Agency Programs Prior to 1999. CO 1. The NO A Program . CO 2. R830 and R1500 Contracts. CO
District Court, S.D. New York · 2006-03-02 · Published · cited 27× · 417 F. Supp. 2d 477; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9058; 2006 WL 538248
417 F.Supp.2d 477 (2006) WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK, the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, Mauro Gabriele, George Mgrditchian, Peter Jackson, Barry Weprin and Clark Neuringer, in their Official Capacity as Members of the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, and Antonio Vozza, in his Official Capacity as a Former Member of the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, Defendants.