Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Ohio Learning Centers, LLC v. Sylvan Learning, Inc.”
Nolfi v. Ohio Kentucky Oil Corp.public domain
675 F.3d 538 (2012) Gregory M. NOLFI, as Successor Trustee under the Frederick E. Nonneman Declaration of Trust Dated August 19, 1994, as Amended; Anita C. Nonneman, as Executrix of the Estate of Deceased Frederick E. Nonneman; Rena Nonneman, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. OHIO KENTUCKY OIL CORPORATION; Carol L. Campbell, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Deceased William M. Griffith, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Henderson v. SMC Prods., Inc.public domain
[Cite as Henderson v. SMC Prods., Inc., 2019-Ohio-5275.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY John Henderson, et al. Court of Appeals No. E-18-003 Appellants Trial Court No. 2009-CV-0576 v. SMC Productions, Inc., et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Schaffer Family Investors, LLC v. Sonnierpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN ■ PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT LEE SONNIER’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [67] STEPHEN V. WILSON United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case arises from Plaintiffs’ investments in oil, gas, and mineral royalty and leasehold interests (“OGM Royalty Interests”) — allegedly made with and through Defendants. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants’ sl
Ledo Pizza System, Inc. v. Singhpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Ledo Pizza System, Inc. and Ledo Pizza Carryouts, Ltd. (together “Ledo”) sued Tri-Bro, Inc. (“Tri-Bro”) and Inderjit Singh for violations of the Lanham Act, and other claims. ECF No. 1. Pending is Ledo’s motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 2. On October 22, 2013, the Court held a hearing on the motion; no defendant opposed the m
Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-3234 ______________ JASWINDER SINGH, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, Appellant v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ______________ No. 21-3
Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-3234 ______________ JASWINDER SINGH, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, Appellant v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ______________ No. 21-3
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In re Madoff)public domain
SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING OMNIBUS MOTIONS TO DISMISS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: -- Defendants in 233 adversary proceedings identified in an appendix to this opinion have moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), (2) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss complaints filed by Irving H.
508 F.Supp.2d 601 (2007) UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, v. LaFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant, Counterplaintiff, and LaFarge S.A., Daniel C. Myslinski, David Downs, John D. Yockey, Tom Huffer, Charles Jett, Ed Green, William Hartford, Walter Weldon, Kurt F. Kruzshak, and Sidney Spear, Defendants. No. 03 C 6027. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Div
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Jori, L.L.C. v. B2B Internatl., L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Jori, L.L.C. v. B2B Internatl., L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-1216.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO JORI, LLC, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2016-L-123 - vs -
Romero v. Allstate Insurancepublic domain
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOB CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE RELEASE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. *331I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND . CO A. Allstate’s Agency Programs Prior to 1999. CO 1. The NO A Program . CO 2. R830 and R1500 Contracts. CO
Westchester Day School v. Village of Mamaroneckpublic domain
417 F.Supp.2d 477 (2006) WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK, the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, Mauro Gabriele, George Mgrditchian, Peter Jackson, Barry Weprin and Clark Neuringer, in their Official Capacity as Members of the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, and Antonio Vozza, in his Official Capacity as a Former Member of the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, Defendants.