Cases

MEMORANDUM ORDER BUMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court upon the appeal by Plaintiff Theresa Pfis-ter Stockett (the “Plaintiff’) of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs application for social security benefits [Docket No. 1]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court VACATES the decision of the Administrative

651 F.Supp.2d 434 (2009) Daniel J. NATALE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 2:08-cv-476. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. August 21, 2009. *437 Joshua D. Lamancusa, Law Offices of Carmen F. Lamancusa, P.C., New Castle, PA, Plaintiff. Christy Wiegand, United States Attorney's Off

782 F.Supp.2d 152 (2011) Gianine BRACCIODIETA-NELSON, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 02:10-cv-854. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. April 27, 2011. *154 Lindsay Fulton Osterhout, Oakmont, PA, for Plaintiff. Paul Kovac, United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, f

06-5332-cv Kohler v. Commissioner of Social Security UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2007 (Argued: April 29, 2008 Decided: October 16, 2008) Docket No. 06-5332-cv _____________________________________ KATHY KOHLER,

574 F.3d 685 (2009) Jerry C. VALENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-35374. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 2009. Filed July 20, 2009. *687 Linda S. Ziskin, Lake Oswego, OR, argued the cause for the appe

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER NORMAN A. MORDUE, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On April 30, 2008, plaintiff filed an application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) on behalf of her son, D.H., who was then seven years old. T.12.1 Plaintiff claimed that D.H. suffered from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) and borderline intellect

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY C. VALENTINE,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 08-35374 v.  D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00034-KI COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Ap

794 F.Supp.2d 1025 (2011) Michelle Lee KLIBER, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, and Secretary of Social Security, Defendants. Civ. No. 10-2513 (JJK). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. June 28, 2011. *1028 Michelle Lee Kliber, Elk River, MN, pro se Plaintiff. Lonnie F. Bryan, Esq., Assistant United St

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Bradley Nichols v. Case No. 16-cv-443-PB Opinion No. 2018 DNH 047 US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Bradley Nichols challenges the denial of his claims for Social Security disability income (“SSDI”) benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. In April 1999, Harriet Hudson applied for Supplemental Security Income benefits on behalf of her son, Sterling Jones (Sterling). After her application for benefits was denied, she requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who determined that Sterling was not disabled. Hudson’s administrative appeal was unsuccessful, and she then sought

141 F.3d 1185 98 CJ C.A.R. 1640 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F N E W H AM P S H I R E C a it lin F a v a t a v. Ca se No. 1:22-cv-00552-P B Opin ion No. 2023 DNH 148 Kilo lo K ija k a z i, P h .D ., P .S .W. Ac t in g C o m m i s s io n e r , S o c ia l S e c u r it y Ad m in is t r a t io n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Mark A. Giandomenico v. Civil No. 16-cv-506-PB Opinion No. 2017 DNH 237 U.S. Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Mark Giandomenico challenges the Social Security Administration’s denial of his claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) b

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge *274Pro se plaintiff Dermy Urena seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplement social security insurance. The Commissioner now moves for judgment on the pleadings.1 For the reasons stated

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Shawn Monae Colbert brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act (the "Act").

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Carmen Polanco ("Plaintiff" or "Polanco") brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), denying her application for

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 14-1952 PEDRO LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; ABEL CANO, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; KEVIN SLEDGE, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; CHARLES DE JESÚS, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; RICHARD BROOKS, individual

698 F.Supp.2d 436 (2010) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF the OFFICE OF VERMONT HEALTH ACCESS o/b/o Francis CAREY, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services,[1] Defendant. Case No. 2:08-CV-168. United States District Court, D. Vermont. March 15, 2010. *438 Jacob S. Spe

DECISION and ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. Before the court are the motions for summary judgment of Plaintiff First National Acceptance Company (“First National”) and City of Utica, New York, in this matter involving the demolition of a building on property in the City of Utica of which Plaintiff was the mortgagee. See dkt. # s 25, 26. The parties have submitted briefing and evid

265 F.Supp.2d 488 (2003) Keith I. SCHORR and Susan Schorr, In their own right and as personal representatives of the Estate of Ryan K. Schorr, Plaintiffs, v. BOROUGH OF LEMOYNE; Borough of Wormleysburg; West Shore Regional Police Dept.; Howard Dougherty, Chief, West Shore Regional Police Dept.; Cumberland County; Robert Goril, Executive Director, Cumberland County Mental Health/Mental Retardation Dept.; Holy Spirit Hospital, and West Shore Region