⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “OLMOS v. COLVIN”

Newton v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017-08-23 · Published · cited 44× · 168 A.3d 1; 455 Md. 341; 2017 Md. LEXIS 603
Adkins, J. In posteonvietion cases, we must often navigate the fine line between a defendant’s right to a fair trial on the one hand and the legal system’s interest in finality on the other. Today we are faced with the question of whether a posteonvietion petitioner’s trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective in consenting to the presence of an alternate juror during deliberations. ■ We also address whether his appellate
District Court, N.D. California · 2010-11-22 · Published · cited 0× · 756 F. Supp. 2d 1170; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123721; 2010 WL 4916400
756 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2010) Mark ENNIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DALY CITY, et al., Defendant(s). No. C 09-05318 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 22, 2010. *1171 David J. Beauvais, Law Office of David J. Beauvais, Oakland, CA, Gilbert Whitney Leigh, Gonzalez & Leigh, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintif