Cases

755 N.W.2d 57 (2008) 276 Neb. 448 STATE of Nebraska, appellee, v. Ion DRAGANESCU, appellant. No. S-07-797. Supreme Court of Nebraska. August 22, 2008. *69 Dennis R. Keefe, Lancaster County Public Defender, Lincoln, and Matthew G. Graff for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Erin E. Leuenb

204 Okla. 360 (1951) 230 P.2d 258 WASSON v. COLLETT et al. No. 34042. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 10, 1951. W.A. Barnett, Okmulgee, for plaintiff in error. Tom Payne, Okmulgee, for defendants in error. HALLEY, J. This case is an appeal from the district court of Okmulgee county, and involves the title to 40 acres of

DAVISON, Justice (dissenting). I think I should outline briefly my reasons for dissenting to the majority opinion in the above styled cause. It is my opinion that in this case there is an entire absence of two elements essentially prerequisite to recovery by the plaintiffs in the trial court. They are lack of proof of contractual obligations and lack of consideration for any contract. The purp

ALLEN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The Court is of opinion, that as by the contract between David Watts and James B. Wilson, the former was only bound to make a deed for the land upon the payment of the purchase money, it would have been competent for the vendor at any time whilst he retained the legal title as a security for the payment of the purchase money, to have filed a bill for the specific

ALLEN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The Court is of opinion, that as by the contract between David Watts and James B. Wilson, the former was only bound to make a deed for the land upon the payment of the purchase money, it would have been competent for the vendor at any time whilst he retained the legal title as a security for the payment of the purchase money, to have filed a bill for the specific

ALLEN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The Court is of opinion, that as by the contract between David Watts and James B. Wilson, the former was only bound to make a deed for the land upon the payment of the purchase money, it would have been competent for the vendor at any time whilst he retained the legal title as a security for the payment of the purchase money, to have filed a bill for the specific

THOMPSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The accused, the captain of a canal boat and carrier for hire on the James river canal, was on the 7th of December 1848, committed by the mayor of the city of Richmond, upon a charge of feloniously embezzling and fraudulently converting to *713his own use, a box of merchandise, delivered to him for tran

THOMPSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The accused, the captain of a canal boat and carrier for hire on the James river canal, was on the 7th of December 1848, committed by the mayor of the city of Richmond, upon a charge of feloniously embezzling and fraudulently converting to *713his own use, a box of merchandise, delivered to him for tran

THOMPSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The accused, the captain of a canal boat and carrier for hire on the James river canal, was on the 7th of December 1848, committed by the mayor of the city of Richmond, upon a charge of feloniously embezzling and fraudulently converting to *713his own use, a box of merchandise, delivered to him for tran