⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “O'NEILL v. HUTTON COMMUNICATIONS, INC”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-11-22 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JONATHAN LOGAN and SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, INC., Appellants, v. JANICE LOGAN, individually and as trustee for the James Logan Family Trust dated February 10, 2021, and ALEXIS LOGAN, Appellees. No. 2D2023-1798 November 22, 2024 Appeal
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994-03-25 · Published · cited 3× · 19 F.3d 42; 305 U.S. App. D.C. 195; 74 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1327; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5438
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) appeals two orders of the Federal Communications Commission (“the Commission” or “FCC”).1 The first order denied TDS’s application for review of the Common Carrier Bureau’s decision to grant Mr. Ellis Thompson a conditional permit to construct and operate cellu
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994-03-25 · Published · cited 30× · 19 F.3d 42
19 F.3d 42 305 U.S.App.D.C. 195 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC., United States CellularCorporation, Appellants,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,American Cellular Network Corp., doing business as ComsatCellular Communications, Inc.; and Ellis ThompsonCorp., Intervenors. Nos. 92-1273, 93-1192. United States Court of Appeals,Distr
District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990-04-09 · Published · cited 0× · 130 F.R.D. 679; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5312; 1990 WL 52468
ORDER KOVACHEVICH, District Judge., THIS CAUSE comes on for consideration upon the magistrates’s report and recommendation recommending that: (1) plaintiffs’ Petition for Allowance of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (Dkt.210) be GRANTED insofar as plaintiffs are entitled to the recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees totalling $191,135.75 as the prevailing parties in this action; (2) that insofar a
District Court, M.D. Florida · 1989-06-19 · Published · cited 42× · 715 F. Supp. 1512; 109 A.L.R. Fed. 377; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6906; 1989 WL 68010
715 F.Supp. 1512 (1989) Kenneth BARNEBEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. E.F. HUTTON & CO., et al., Defendants. No. 87-1420-CIV-T-17(C). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 19, 1989. *1513 *1514 *1515 Michael C. Addison, Addison, Ke
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010-08-02 · Published · cited 1× · 727 F. Supp. 2d 77; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77788; 2010 WL 3001710
727 F.Supp.2d 77 (2010) Russell HOFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. POPULAR, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 09-1428 (GAG/BJM). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 2, 2010. *79 Andres W. Lopez, Andres W. Lopez Law Office, Roberto O. Maldonado-Nieves, Roberto O. Mal
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-01-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 19-cv-2723 (CRC) v. ATLAS AIR, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Two airlines, Southern Air and Atlas Air, have been in
District Court, E.D. California · 2008-06-20 · Published · cited 6× · 636 F. Supp. 2d 1008; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83867; 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1499; 2008 WL 2523368
636 F.Supp.2d 1008 (2008) Donna RAMIREZ-BAKER, Plaintiff, v. BEAZER HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-F-008-601 LJO DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 20, 2008. *1013 Jacob J. Rivas, Law Offices of Jacob J. Rivas, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff. R. Read Gignilliat, Phv, Tracy Lynn Glanton, Elarbee Th
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018-01-24 · Published · cited 3× · 306 F. Supp. 3d 1204
Susan Oki Mollway, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") complains that Defendants MJC, Inc., and GAC Auto Group, Inc., which separately or together *1208own or operate a car dealership, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") by
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-01-12 · Published · cited 89× · 394 F.3d 444
OPINION FORESTER, Chief District Judge. The Defendants-Appellants appeal the District Court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The District Court held that the arbitration provisions contained in five agreements between the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendants-Appellants were not enforceable because four of those provisions were fraudulently i
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
Alaska Supreme Court · 2012-02-10 · Published · cited 3× · 279 P.3d 1156; 2012 Alas. LEXIS 29; 2012 WL 414235
OPINION CHRISTEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC, is a general contractor involved in the construction of roads, bridges, and dams; it also supplies support services to the oilfield see-tor. In 1995, Alaska Interstate Construetion's assets were sold to a joint venture but it continued to be operated by its founder, John Ellsworth, through a company he owned
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-08-13 · Published · cited 14× · 340 F.3d 386
OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. This dispute arises from a massive fraud in which Frank Gruttadauria, a Cleveland stockbroker, misappropriated at least $54 million of his clients’ money. The plaintiffs, all clients of Gruttadauria, brought this action against the brokerage houses for which he worked over the course of his career. The defendants moved to stay the proceedings and compel arbitration pu
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-01-12 · Published · cited 34× · 394 F.3d 444
394 F.3d 444 Samuel GLAZER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC., Defendant,SG Cowen Securities Corporation; Societe Generale, Defendants-Appellants.Samuel Glazer, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,SG Cowen Securities Corporation, Defendant. No. 03-4312. No. 03-4415. United St
Texas Supreme Court · 2002-06-13 · Published · cited 72× · 79 S.W.3d 30; 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 815; 2002 Tex. LEXIS 82; 2002 WL 1290896
79 S.W.3d 30 (2002) MARINER FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and Joe F. Moore, Jr., Petitioners, v. H.G. BOSSLEY and Carole P. Bossley, Respondents. No. 00-0325. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 7, 2001. Decided June 13, 2002. Norman T. Reynolds, Jackson Walker, James M. McGraw, Looper Reed Mark & McGraw, Houston, for Petitioner. Jim Luis Gar
Robert Fazio v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Hambrecht & Quist, Inc. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Robert Fazio v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale Hambrecht & Quist, Inc. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Robert Fazio v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Hambrecht & Quist, Inc. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Robert Fazio, Samuel Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Robert Fazio, Samuel Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale Hambrecht & Quist, Inc. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Robert Fazio, Dominic A. Visconsi, Sr. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Robert Fazio, Dominic A. Visconsi, Sr. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Peter A. Spitalieri v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Peter A. Spitalieri v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generale, Richard Lopardo v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation, Richard Lopardo v. Lehman Brothers, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation, Peter M. Bonutti, M.D. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation, Peter M. Bonutti, M.D. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc., S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation, Robert Fazio v. Cowen & Company, Dominic A. Visconsi, Sr. v. Cowen & Company, Richard Lopardo v. Cowen & Company, Peter M. Bonutti, M.D. v. Cowen & Company, Dominic A. Visconsi, Sr. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Dominic A. Visconsi, Sr. v. S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation Societe Generalepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-08-13 · Published · cited 96× · 340 F.3d 386
340 F.3d 386 Robert FAZIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants, S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation; Societe Generale, Defendants-Appellants, Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.; J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Defendants.Robert Fazio, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation;
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006-08-10 · Published · cited 48× · 457 F.3d 376; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20537; 2006 WL 2294272
Affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge SHEDD joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge. Child Evangelism Fellowship of Maryland, Inc. (“CEF”), which describes itself as a nonprofit “Bible-centered, world-wide organization composed of born-again believers whose purpose is to evangelize
District Court, S.D. New York · 2000-12-29 · Published · cited 10× · 126 F. Supp. 2d 672; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18752; 2000 WL 1897794
126 F.Supp.2d 672 (2000) Henryk de KWIATKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., Bear Stearns Securities Corp., and Bear Stearns Forex Inc., Defendants. No. 96 CIV. 4798(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 29, 2000. *673 *674 *675
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997-02-22 · Published · cited 7× · 959 F. Supp. 73; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3107; 1997 WL 117716
959 F.Supp. 73 (1997) DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., and David Rodriguez, Plaintiffs, v. Bonifacio SÁNCHEZ ESPADA, and Mirna López de Sánchez, Defendants. Civil No. 96-1393(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 22, 1997. *74 Nestor Mendez-Gomez, Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez, Hato Rey, P.R., for plaintiffs.
District Court, E.D. New York · 1997-04-11 · Published · cited 17× · 958 F. Supp. 785; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4975; 1997 WL 180335
958 F.Supp. 785 (1997) Kenneth J. TARR, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT SUISSE ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Swiss American Corporation, Swiss American Securities, Inc., Credit Suisse, Hans Peter Sorg, Jorge Schwarzenbach, Frank Meister, George Helwig and John Does I through V, Persons and/or entities who cooperated and/or participated in the wrongs alleged herein, but are as yet unidentified, Defendants. No. 95 CV 1857(FB).