Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “O'NEILL v. HUTTON COMMUNICATIONS, INC”
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JONATHAN LOGAN and SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, INC., Appellants, v. JANICE LOGAN, individually and as trustee for the James Logan Family Trust dated February 10, 2021, and ALEXIS LOGAN, Appellees. No. 2D2023-1798 November 22, 2024 Appeal
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) appeals two orders of the Federal Communications Commission (“the Commission” or “FCC”).1 The first order denied TDS’s application for review of the Common Carrier Bureau’s decision to grant Mr. Ellis Thompson a conditional permit to construct and operate cellu
19 F.3d 42 305 U.S.App.D.C. 195 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC., United States CellularCorporation, Appellants,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,American Cellular Network Corp., doing business as ComsatCellular Communications, Inc.; and Ellis ThompsonCorp., Intervenors. Nos. 92-1273, 93-1192. United States Court of Appeals,Distr
Barneby v. E.F. Hutton & Co.public domain
ORDER KOVACHEVICH, District Judge., THIS CAUSE comes on for consideration upon the magistrates’s report and recommendation recommending that: (1) plaintiffs’ Petition for Allowance of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (Dkt.210) be GRANTED insofar as plaintiffs are entitled to the recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees totalling $191,135.75 as the prevailing parties in this action; (2) that insofar a
Barnebey v. E.F. Hutton & Co.public domain
715 F.Supp. 1512 (1989) Kenneth BARNEBEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. E.F. HUTTON & CO., et al., Defendants. No. 87-1420-CIV-T-17(C). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 19, 1989. *1513 *1514 *1515 Michael C. Addison, Addison, Ke
Hoff v. Popular, Inc.public domain
727 F.Supp.2d 77 (2010) Russell HOFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. POPULAR, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 09-1428 (GAG/BJM). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 2, 2010. *79 Andres W. Lopez, Andres W. Lopez Law Office, Roberto O. Maldonado-Nieves, Roberto O. Mal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 19-cv-2723 (CRC) v. ATLAS AIR, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Two airlines, Southern Air and Atlas Air, have been in
Ramirez-Baker v. Beazer Homes, Inc.public domain
636 F.Supp.2d 1008 (2008) Donna RAMIREZ-BAKER, Plaintiff, v. BEAZER HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-F-008-601 LJO DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 20, 2008. *1013 Jacob J. Rivas, Law Offices of Jacob J. Rivas, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff. R. Read Gignilliat, Phv, Tracy Lynn Glanton, Elarbee Th
U.S. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. MJC, Inc.public domain
Susan Oki Mollway, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") complains that Defendants MJC, Inc., and GAC Auto Group, Inc., which separately or together *1208own or operate a car dealership, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") by
Glazer v. Lehman Bros Incpublic domain
OPINION FORESTER, Chief District Judge. The Defendants-Appellants appeal the District Court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The District Court held that the arbitration provisions contained in five agreements between the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendants-Appellants were not enforceable because four of those provisions were fraudulently i
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
OPINION CHRISTEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC, is a general contractor involved in the construction of roads, bridges, and dams; it also supplies support services to the oilfield see-tor. In 1995, Alaska Interstate Construetion's assets were sold to a joint venture but it continued to be operated by its founder, John Ellsworth, through a company he owned
Fazio v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.public domain
OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. This dispute arises from a massive fraud in which Frank Gruttadauria, a Cleveland stockbroker, misappropriated at least $54 million of his clients’ money. The plaintiffs, all clients of Gruttadauria, brought this action against the brokerage houses for which he worked over the course of his career. The defendants moved to stay the proceedings and compel arbitration pu
394 F.3d 444 Samuel GLAZER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC., Defendant,SG Cowen Securities Corporation; Societe Generale, Defendants-Appellants.Samuel Glazer, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,SG Cowen Securities Corporation, Defendant. No. 03-4312. No. 03-4415. United St
Mariner Financial Group, Inc. v. Bossleypublic domain
79 S.W.3d 30 (2002) MARINER FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and Joe F. Moore, Jr., Petitioners, v. H.G. BOSSLEY and Carole P. Bossley, Respondents. No. 00-0325. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 7, 2001. Decided June 13, 2002. Norman T. Reynolds, Jackson Walker, James M. McGraw, Looper Reed Mark & McGraw, Houston, for Petitioner. Jim Luis Gar
340 F.3d 386 Robert FAZIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants, S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation; Societe Generale, Defendants-Appellants, Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.; J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Defendants.Robert Fazio, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, S.G. Cowen Securities Corporation;
Affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge SHEDD joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge. Child Evangelism Fellowship of Maryland, Inc. (“CEF”), which describes itself as a nonprofit “Bible-centered, world-wide organization composed of born-again believers whose purpose is to evangelize
De Kwiatkowski v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.public domain
126 F.Supp.2d 672 (2000) Henryk de KWIATKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., Bear Stearns Securities Corp., and Bear Stearns Forex Inc., Defendants. No. 96 CIV. 4798(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 29, 2000. *673 *674 *675
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Sanchez Espadapublic domain
959 F.Supp. 73 (1997) DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., and David Rodriguez, Plaintiffs, v. Bonifacio SÁNCHEZ ESPADA, and Mirna López de Sánchez, Defendants. Civil No. 96-1393(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 22, 1997. *74 Nestor Mendez-Gomez, Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez, Hato Rey, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.public domain
958 F.Supp. 785 (1997) Kenneth J. TARR, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT SUISSE ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Swiss American Corporation, Swiss American Securities, Inc., Credit Suisse, Hans Peter Sorg, Jorge Schwarzenbach, Frank Meister, George Helwig and John Does I through V, Persons and/or entities who cooperated and/or participated in the wrongs alleged herein, but are as yet unidentified, Defendants. No. 95 CV 1857(FB).