Cases

153 F.Supp.2d 378 (2001) Julie O'DELL, Plaintiff, v. TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 00 Civ. 5156(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 28, 2001. *379 *380 Anne C. Vladeck, Karen Cacace, Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P.C., New York, New York,

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: In antitrust suits, definitions matter. When a plaintiff offers an undisputed definition of the relevant products and markets at issue, it is just and reasonable to hold the plaintiff to its own definition. Deborah Heart and Lung Center (Deborah) set the parameters for the instant dispute before the District Court and subsequ

436 F.Supp.2d 448 (2006) Linda GARONE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Stan Scigowski, and Thomas Dullahan, Defendants. No. 00-CV-6722 (ILG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 27, 2006. *449 *450 Saul D. Zabell, Zabell & Associates, P.C., for the Plaintiff. <

332 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2004) James JORDEN, Plaintiff, v. WALMART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 01-CV-1512. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. March 29, 2004. *1173 *1174 Brian A. Kuehn, Rochford & Assoc, Peoria, IL, for Plaintiff. William J. Holloway, Hinshaw & Culbertson,

265 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2003) Diane D. DICK, Plaintiff, v. PHONE DIRECTORIES COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. 2:01-CV-785TC. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. June 4, 2003. *1275 Mark C. McLachlan, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff. Matthew M. Durham, Justin B. Palmer, Stoel Rives LLP, Steven K. Gordon, Gab

170 F.Supp.2d 219 (2001) Gloria WILBURN v. FLEET FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Thomas Coville No. 3:99CV1542(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 10, 2001. *220 *221 *222 *223

210 F.Supp.2d 330 (2002) Kyle H. LITTLE, Julie Anna Perez, John Rivera, Marta Hogan, Gilbert Muro, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Nos. 00 Civ. 3609(SAS), 00 Civ. 3612(SAS), 00 Civ. 3616(SAS), 00 Civ. 5771(SAS), 00 Civ. 5774(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 22, 2002. *331

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff commenced this action on June 20, 2013, alleging sexual harassment, hostile work environment, and retaliation by Defendants in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”) in connection with Plaintiffs employment as an account executive in Defendants’ Vestal, New York office. See

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiff has brought this pro se discrimination and retaliation case against her former employer following termination during her initial six-month probationary period. Although Plaintiff purportedly was terminated because of repeated lateness and poor performance, she alleges that the actual reason for her termination was racial animu

241 P.3d 255 (2010) 2010 OK CIV APP 84 Brenda FULTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PEOPLE LEASE CORPORATION and Mark Findley, Defendants/Appellees, and Ervin Findley Trucking, Inc., Defendant. No. 106,675. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. March

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action against her former employer for disability and sex discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation against her former employer. According to Plaintiff, she was subjected to unfavorable treatment on the basis of sex, was not accommodated when she later became disabled, and eventually was fired as a result of e

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. This Memorandum Opinion addresses Plaintiff Abraham Mallik’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, ECF No. 21; the Opposition that Defendant Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) filed, ECF No. 27; and Plaintiffs Reply, ECF Ño. 28; as well as Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Vivian Beale (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against the Mount Vernon Police Department alleging sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 In addition, Plaintiff brings a state law claim for a hostile work environment

641 F.Supp.2d 211 (2009) Collette J. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Correction Officers' Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc, and Norman Seabrook, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 9638(SHS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 17, 2009. *216 Donnahue G. George, Law Offices of

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Defendants Continuum Health Partners, Inc. (“Continuum”) and Long Island College Hospital (“LICH”) move for summary judgment against the Complaint of Glenis Chin-McKenzie, which claims sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and discrimination on the basis

Owens, J. Thomas Davis sued his employer, Microsoft Corporation, alleging disability discrimination under the Washington Law Against Discrimination, chapter 49.60 RCW (WLAD). Davis argued two theories: first, that the WLAD required Microsoft to alter his job duties to accommodate his disability (hepatitis C infection), which prevented him from working more than 8 hours a day and 40 hours a week; and, second, that Microsoft’s effo

213 F.Supp.2d 142 (2002) Bravell ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:99CV1853(CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 12, 2002. *143 Steven D. Jacobs, Jacobs, Jacobs & Shannon, PC, New Haven, CT, for plaintiff. Kevin C. Shea, William H. Clendenen, Jr., Patrick M

918 P.2d 1185 (1996) 128 Idaho 740 Randia FOWLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOOTENAI COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Defendant-Respondent. No. 21615. Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur D'Alene, October 1995 Term. May 8, 1996. Rehearing Denied July 22, 1996. *1186 Janet E. J

225 F.Supp.2d 190 (2002) Janet Schrader BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. The PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Larry Mitchell, John Barbagallo, and Michael Beney, Defendants. No. 00-CV-0286. United States District Court, N.D. New York. September 26, 2002. *191 *192

70 P.3d 126 (2003) 149 Wash.2d 521 Thomas DAVIS, Petitioner, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Respondent. No. 72250-1. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued October 17, 2002. Decided June 5, 2003. *128 O'Shea Barnard Martin, David Hasbrook, Bellevue, for Petitione