⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “O'Connor v. City of Boulder”

District Court, D. Colorado · 2018-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 341 F. Supp. 3d 1241
Marcia S. Krieger, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Court's discussion with the parties during a hearing on August 15, 2018 (# 46) , and the parties' supplemental briefing on the issue of Pullman abstention (# 48, 49) . FACTS For purposes of this Order, the perti
District Court, D. Colorado · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F. Supp. 3d 1360; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160782; 2014 WL 6432592
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Darren O’Connor lives in Boulder, Colorado and is a political activist who focuses on home foreclosure issues. He is an active member of the Colorado Foreclosure Resistance Coalition (“Foreclosure Coalition”). Defendant Angela Williams is a state house representative who represents State House District 7, which covers north
District Court, D. Colorado · 2009-08-26 · Published · cited 12× · 652 F. Supp. 2d 1188; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76794; 2009 WL 2766723
652 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2009) Sylvia M. ASTEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BOULDER, a Colorado municipality, Patrick Compton, in his individual and official capacities, and Jeremy Frenzen, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00845-PAB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 26, 2009. *1193
Supreme Court of the United States · 1982-01-13 · Published · cited 379× · 70 L. Ed. 2d 810; 102 S. Ct. 835; 455 U.S. 40; 1982 U.S. LEXIS 65; 50 U.S.L.W. 4144; 50 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1183; 1 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,502
*58Justice Stevens, concurring. The Court’s opinion, which I have joined, explains why the city of Boulder is not entitled to an exemption from the antitrust laws. The dissenting opinion seems to assume that the Court’s analysis of the exemption issue is tantamount to a holding that the antitrust laws have been violated. The assumption is not valid. Th
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016-06-30 · Published · cited 5× · 2016 COA 104; 409 P.3d 516; 2016 Colo. App. LEXIS 918
Opinion by JUDGE DUNN ¶ 1 Unhappy that the roads in their subdivision have fallen into disrepair, property owners in unincorporated Boulder County (collectively, the Owners) filed an action to force the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners (the County) to maintain their subdivision- roads.- We conclude the Owners do not have standing to bring their clai
District Court, D. Colorado · 1997-08-04 · Published · cited 8× · 973 F. Supp. 1010; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11588; 1997 WL 440613
973 F.Supp. 1010 (1997) Andrew J. O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. CHECK RITE, LTD.; and Jon R. Hawks, Ltd., Defendants. No. 96-K-1856. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 4, 1997. *1011 *1012 *1013 Donald J. Banovitz, Hughes Clikeman & Associates,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009-06-29 · Published · cited 4× · 569 F.3d 1244
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Stephen Starkey, his wife Bedra Starkey, and his three children, A.B., C.D., and E.F., brought this action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Boulder County Department of Social Services (BCDSS) and six BCDSS employees — Doreen Miller, Brian Russell, Holly Smith, Barbara Park, Julie Kintzing, and Ann Baldwin — sued in their official and personal capacities (collectively, Defendants).
Nevada Supreme Court · 1990-08-21 · Published · cited 50× · 797 P.2d 946; 106 Nev. 497; 1990 Nev. LEXIS 96
*499OPINION By the Court, Steffen, J.: The district court entered summary judgment against appellants Charlie Brown Construction Company, Inc. (Brown) and Delta Electric Company, Inc. (Delta), subcontractors on a subdivision project approved by respondent City of Boulder City (City) on six grounds. Two of the grounds consisted of a st
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021-11-24 · Published · cited 12× · 18 F.4th 1205
FILED Appellate Case: 19-2140 Document: 010110610058 United Date Filed: States CourtPage: 11/24/2021 of Appeals 1 Tenth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009-06-29 · Published · cited 80× · 569 F.3d 1244
569 F.3d 1244 (2009) Stephen STARKEY, and Bedra Starkey, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of A.B., C.D., and E.F.[*], Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOULDER COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES; Doreen Miller; Brian Russell; Holly Smith; Barbara Park; Julie Kintzing; Ann Baldwin, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-1013. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.<
District Court, D. Colorado · 2019-01-09 · Published · cited 17× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 1011
JOHN L. KANE, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE On the night of February 14, 2014, Plaintiff Patti French called 911 to obtain *1020a mental health hold for her son, Plaintiff Shane French. Officers from the Cortez Police Department arrived at the French home in short order. Hearing voices inside, they entered the residence, tackled Shane, and tase
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-07-07 · Published · cited 26× · 39 F.4th 1101
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU, No. 21-15313 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:20-cv-00163- DKW-RT SUNOCO LP; ALOHA PETROLEUM, LTD.; EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION; SHELL PLC; SHELL USA, INC.; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; CHEVRON CORPORATIO
Ohio Supreme Court · 2015-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 143 Ohio St. 3d 50; 34 N.E.3d 99
{¶ 1} This cause, here on appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Walker v. Toledo, 143 Ohio St.3d 420, 2014-Ohio-5461, 39 N.E.3d 474, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., conc
Ohio Supreme Court · 2015-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 143 Ohio St. 3d 1201; 34 N.E.3d 123
{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent. O’Donnell, J., not participating.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-05-11 · Published · cited 18× · 890 F.3d 769
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE No. 17-35640 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RASIER, LLC, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:17-cv-00370- RSL v. CITY OF SEATTLE; SEATTLE OPINION DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES; FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Di
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 316× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 112 A.D.2d 336; 491 N.Y.S.2d 785; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56476
In an action, inter alia, to cancel a deed transferring property from plaintiff to defendant, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Slifkin, J.), entered April 24, 1984, which, inter alia, granted the branch of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) which was to dismiss the action on the ground that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with costs, for t
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1644 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CENTRAL LLC; CROWN CENTRAL NEW HOLDINGS LLC; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXON MOBIL CORP.; EXXON
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-18 · Published · cited 107× · 582 F.3d 910; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20862
582 F.3d 910 (2009) Paul A. STOOT, Sr.; Tammie L. Stoot, husband and wife, and as parents and guardians of Paul A. Stoot II; and Paul A. Stoot II, a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF EVERETT, a municipal corporation; Officer Jon A. Jensen; Jane Doe Jensen, and the marital community thereof, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-35425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAUL A. STOOT, SR.; TAMMIE L.  STOOT, husband and wife, and as parents and guardians of Paul A. Stoot II; and PAUL A. STOOT II, a No. 07-35425 minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v.  CV-05-01983-TSZ AMENDED CITY OF E