Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “O'Connor v. City of Boulder”
Marcia S. Krieger, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Court's discussion with the parties during a hearing on August 15, 2018 (# 46) , and the parties' supplemental briefing on the issue of Pullman abstention (# 48, 49) . FACTS For purposes of this Order, the perti
O'Connor v. Williamspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Darren O’Connor lives in Boulder, Colorado and is a political activist who focuses on home foreclosure issues. He is an active member of the Colorado Foreclosure Resistance Coalition (“Foreclosure Coalition”). Defendant Angela Williams is a state house representative who represents State House District 7, which covers north
Asten v. City of Boulderpublic domain
652 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2009) Sylvia M. ASTEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BOULDER, a Colorado municipality, Patrick Compton, in his individual and official capacities, and Jeremy Frenzen, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00845-PAB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 26, 2009. *1193
Community Communications Co. v. City of Boulderpublic domain
*58Justice Stevens, concurring. The Court’s opinion, which I have joined, explains why the city of Boulder is not entitled to an exemption from the antitrust laws. The dissenting opinion seems to assume that the Court’s analysis of the exemption issue is tantamount to a holding that the antitrust laws have been violated. The assumption is not valid. Th
Opinion by JUDGE DUNN ¶ 1 Unhappy that the roads in their subdivision have fallen into disrepair, property owners in unincorporated Boulder County (collectively, the Owners) filed an action to force the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners (the County) to maintain their subdivision- roads.- We conclude the Owners do not have standing to bring their clai
O'CONNOR v. Check Rite, Ltd.public domain
973 F.Supp. 1010 (1997) Andrew J. O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. CHECK RITE, LTD.; and Jon R. Hawks, Ltd., Defendants. No. 96-K-1856. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 4, 1997. *1011 *1012 *1013 Donald J. Banovitz, Hughes Clikeman & Associates,
Starkey v. Boulder County Social Servicespublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Stephen Starkey, his wife Bedra Starkey, and his three children, A.B., C.D., and E.F., brought this action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Boulder County Department of Social Services (BCDSS) and six BCDSS employees — Doreen Miller, Brian Russell, Holly Smith, Barbara Park, Julie Kintzing, and Ann Baldwin — sued in their official and personal capacities (collectively, Defendants).
*499OPINION By the Court, Steffen, J.: The district court entered summary judgment against appellants Charlie Brown Construction Company, Inc. (Brown) and Delta Electric Company, Inc. (Delta), subcontractors on a subdivision project approved by respondent City of Boulder City (City) on six grounds. Two of the grounds consisted of a st
Martin v. City of Albuquerquepublic domain
FILED Appellate Case: 19-2140 Document: 010110610058 United Date Filed: States CourtPage: 11/24/2021 of Appeals 1 Tenth Circuit
Starkey Ex Rel. AB v. BOULDER COUNTY SOC. SERV.public domain
569 F.3d 1244 (2009) Stephen STARKEY, and Bedra Starkey, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of A.B., C.D., and E.F.[*], Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOULDER COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES; Doreen Miller; Brian Russell; Holly Smith; Barbara Park; Julie Kintzing; Ann Baldwin, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-1013. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.<
French v. City of Caseypublic domain
JOHN L. KANE, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE On the night of February 14, 2014, Plaintiff Patti French called 911 to obtain *1020a mental health hold for her son, Plaintiff Shane French. Officers from the Cortez Police Department arrived at the French home in short order. Hearing voices inside, they entered the residence, tackled Shane, and tase
City & County of Honolulu v. Sunoco Lppublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU, No. 21-15313 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:20-cv-00163- DKW-RT SUNOCO LP; ALOHA PETROLEUM, LTD.; EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION; SHELL PLC; SHELL USA, INC.; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; CHEVRON CORPORATIO
Jodka v. City of Clevelandpublic domain
{¶ 1} This cause, here on appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Walker v. Toledo, 143 Ohio St.3d 420, 2014-Ohio-5461, 39 N.E.3d 474, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., conc
Jodka v. City of Clevelandpublic domain
{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent. O’Donnell, J., not participating.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. City of Seattlepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE No. 17-35640 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RASIER, LLC, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:17-cv-00370- RSL v. CITY OF SEATTLE; SEATTLE OPINION DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES; FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Di
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Boulder Brook Acres, Inc. v. Town of Scarsdalepublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to cancel a deed transferring property from plaintiff to defendant, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Slifkin, J.), entered April 24, 1984, which, inter alia, granted the branch of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) which was to dismiss the action on the ground that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with costs, for t
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP P.L.C.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1644 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CENTRAL LLC; CROWN CENTRAL NEW HOLDINGS LLC; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXON MOBIL CORP.; EXXON
Stoot v. City of Everettpublic domain
582 F.3d 910 (2009) Paul A. STOOT, Sr.; Tammie L. Stoot, husband and wife, and as parents and guardians of Paul A. Stoot II; and Paul A. Stoot II, a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF EVERETT, a municipal corporation; Officer Jon A. Jensen; Jane Doe Jensen, and the marital community thereof, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-35425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Stoot v. City of Everettpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAUL A. STOOT, SR.; TAMMIE L. STOOT, husband and wife, and as parents and guardians of Paul A. Stoot II; and PAUL A. STOOT II, a No. 07-35425 minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. CV-05-01983-TSZ AMENDED CITY OF E