Cases

484 F.Supp.2d 223 (2007) Meggan O'CONNELL v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Civil Action No. 06-10741-RWZ. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 27, 2007. *224 William F. York, Gilman, McLaughlin & Hanrahn, LLP, Boston, MA, for Meggan O'Connell. Mark W. Corner, Riemer &Braunstein LLP, Boston, MA, for Fe

DECISION DENYING MOTION UNDER FED. R. CiV. p. 60(b) FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DENYING DISCHARGE JEROME FELLER, Bankruptcy Judge. On May 6, 2011, the Debtor was denied a discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(3) and 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) (“Order Denying Discharge”). The facts and circumstances underlying the determination to grant the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) and to deny

RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge. I. SUMMARY OF FACTS This is a diversity action arising out of an insurance coverage dispute involving benefits claimed for losses incurred as a result of a fire that destroyed a converted barn owned by the plaintiffs and the contents contained therein. Pending before the court i

2022 IL 127527 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket Nos. 127527, 127594, cons.) JOHN O’CONNELL, Appellee, v. THE COUNTY OF COOK et al., Appellants. Opinion filed May 19, 2022. JUSTICE O

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy Illinois Of

ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Carlene O’Connell (“Carlene”) seeks a declaratory judgment against Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”), asking this Court determine, as a matter of law, that the term “motor vehicle” as used in the exclusionary language of the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage under the Policy at issue is

CHRISTINE O’CONNELL and ) GREG O’CONNELL, ) ) Plaintiffs-Respondents, ) v. ) No. SD36872 ) Filed: July 27, 2021 LEECHIA RAQUEL DEERING, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FR

Trenton Bus. Assistance Corp. v O'Connell (2021 NY Slip Op 00892) Trenton Bus. Assistance Corp. v O'Connell 2021 NY Slip Op 00892 Decided on February 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York

Maspeth Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v O'Connell (2023 NY Slip Op 06037) Maspeth Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v O'Connell 2023 NY Slip Op 06037 Decided on November 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law R

04/15/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 6, 2025 Session COMMITTEE TO STOP AN UNFAIR TAX ET AL. V. FREDDIE O’CONNELL ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 24-1427-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor No. M202

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 10, 2025 Decided April 25, 2025 No. 23-7173 DAVID O'CONNELL, APPELLEE v. UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cv-01365

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-11698 MARY-KATHLEEN O'CONNELL & another,1 trustees,2 vs. GEORGE C.

ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and motions in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Dozier Russell Hood and Dr. Matthew E. Spector (Docs. 17-19) and the Plaintiffs’ motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Trad Wads-worth (Doc. 20). For the reasons discussed below, the Defendant’s

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. (DE 16). The matters have been fully briefed, and in this posture the issue raised are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, the court denies plaintiffs' motion. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to

OPINION Justice Indeglia, for the Court. This appeal emanates from a tragic automobile accident that occurred on the evening of March 9, 2003, in Coventry, Rhode Island. 1 Maureen O’Connell and Paul Ro-berti (plaintiffs) challenge the hearing justice’s grant of summary judg

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting. {¶ 15} I respectfully dissent. In order to insure a third party, the omnibus clause requires that the policyholder own, hire, or borrow a covered “auto.” Both courts below agreed that reasonable minds could not differ in concluding that Bluffton did not “hire” the Executive Coach bus. I agree. {¶ 16} The omnib

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. After brief stints as the Human Resources Director of two Puerto Rico governmental agencies, Plaintiff-Appellant Rosemarie O’Connell sued her former supervisors seeking redress under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the laws of Puerto Rico. The district court dismissed some of her claims at the pleading stage, and the rest at summary judgement. O’Connell now appeals

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00361-CV NORTHWEST CATTLE FEEDERS, APPELLANTS LLC; RILEY LIVESTOCK, INC.; AND JEFF COX V. JASON O’CONNELL AND TOM APPELLEES O’CONNELL ---------- FR

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge Bankruptcy petitioner Herman Segal (“Appellant”) moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) to appeal an order by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss the bankruptcy case. Richard O’Connell, the Chapter 7 trustee of Appellant’s estate (“Appellee”), opposes the motion on the ground

Milkey, J. On July 25, 2006, Roberta O’Connell injured her shoulder while working as a cosmetologist at Rob Roy Coiffures (the employer). For this injury, O’Connell was awarded workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to G. L. c. 152, §§ 34 and 35. The insurer, Peerless Insurance Co., acknowledged liability but contested the amount that O’Connell was due. An administrative judge (AJ) at the Department of Industrial Accide