Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Nowak v. AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION”
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Hardwicke v. American Boychoirpublic domain
845 A.2d 619 (2004) 368 N.J. Super. 71 John W. HARDWICKE, Jr. and Terri S. Hardwicke, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN BOYCHOIR SCHOOL, Defendant-Respondent, and Donald Hanson, Richard Brenner, Thomas Conlin, Donald Profitt, David Schuster, J. Bruce Mellinger, Howard A. Jewell, Harold Jones and The Cook identified as "Ed" or "John," Defendants. Douglas Palmatier, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. American Boychoir
4 F.3d 1153 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1468, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8379,38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 902 LIGHTNING LUBE, INC.; Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporationv.WITCO CORPORATION; Avis Service, Inc.; Avis Lube, Inc.;Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs,v.Ralph VENUTO, individually and d/b/a Laser Lube, LightningLube, and Automotive Management Systems; Carol Venuto, hiswife, ind
Dept. of Rev. v. Wakefieldpublic domain
No. 1 February 3, 2022 1 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Plaintiff, v. James WAKEFIELD, Defendant. (TC 5404) On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, the Department o
Miller-Lerman, J. NATURE OF CASE This contract case, embodied in cases Nos. S-03-941 and S-03-1242, generally involves one transaction, the sale of a business by appellee, Gary’s Implement, Inc. (Seller), to appellant, Bridgeport Tractor Parts, Inc. (Buyer). The transaction was accomplished by execution of several documents on July 15, 1998. The three documents critical to this appeal are labeled: “Agreement
Linkco, Inc. v. Nichimen Corp.public domain
164 F.Supp.2d 203 (2001) LINKCO, INC., Plaintiff, v. NICHIMEN CORP. and Kiyoto Kanda, Defendants. No. 00-CV-11050-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 17, 2001. *204 Michael J. Tuteur, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Russell Beck, Epstein, Becker & Green, Boston, MA, Irving B. Levinson, Michael Mc
Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. BACKGROUND 1162 A. FACTUAL HISTORY 1162 B. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1165 II. STANDARD OF REVIEW 1166 III. WITCO’S APPEAL 1167 A. TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE 1167 B. BREACH OF C
Pilates, Inc. v. Pilates Institute, Inc.public domain
891 F.Supp. 175 (1995) PILATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. PILATES INSTITUTE, INC. d/b/a Institute for the Pilates Method, and Joan Breibart, Defendants. No. 94 CV 4796 (KMW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 10, 1995. *176 *177 Kenneth L. Bressler, Lieberman & Nowak, New York Ci
Peters, C. J. This case comes to us, by way of reservation, as a multifaceted challenge to the constitutional and statutory validity of legislation colloquially known as Lemon Law II that establishes arbitration panels for the settlement of disputes between consumers and manufacturers of new motor vehicles. The plaintiffs, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc., and a number of individual motor vehicle
Members of the Jamestown School Committee v. Schmidtpublic domain
405 A.2d 16 (1979) MEMBERS OF the JAMESTOWN SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al. v. Dr. Thomas C. SCHMIDT et al. No. 78-60-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. August 15, 1979. *17 Revens, DeLuca & Najarian, Amato A. DeLuca, Warwick, for plaintiffs. Dennis J. Roberts, II, Atty. Gen., John R. McDermott, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for d