Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Frank J. LaBuda, J. As the jury trial of People v Novak progressed through its full fifth week of trial testimony, the People served the Middletown Times Herald-Record newspaper with a subpoena duces tecum, seeking to compel testimony from Victor Whitman, a reporter for the Times Herald-Record (hereinafter referred to as the Record), and production of all unpublished audio and v

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about May 30, 1989, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Karla Moskowitz, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.

Bacova v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 03872) Bacova v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 03872 Decided on July 24, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

Bailey v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 03156) Bailey v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 03156 Decided on June 12, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie as of right to review the prior nonfinal Appellate Division order of modification, absent a dissent by at least two Justices on a question of *1003law or the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).

Appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (d) from the stipulation of settlement "so ordered” and entered as a judgment on December 30, 1985, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the stipulation, being conditional, does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 14, at 60-65).

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Order, entered August 20, 2013, affirmed, with $10 costs. We reject, as did Civil Court, the technical arguments advanced by tenant-appellant in support of her cross motion to dismiss the within nonprimary residence holdover summary proceeding. Neither the record tenant nor her husband, respondent Novak, may now be heard to argue that the combined notice of

J.K. v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 00270) J.K. v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 00270 Decided on January 23, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

J.K. v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 00270) J.K. v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 00270 Decided on January 23, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION OF THE COURT Edward H. Lehner, J. The main questions presented herein are: (i) Despite a strong policy against exculpatory provisions that seek to insulate a contracting party from liability for ifs own gross negligence, coupled with plaintiff’s allegations of defendant’s gross negligence in this case, may plaintiff’s recovery nonetheless be barred by its failure to comply with a contractual notic

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge: Plaintiff Shanti Novak brings this action against Defendants Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, Captain Scott Politano, Chief John Hennelly and Sergeant Kristen Brylinski (collectively, “Defendants”). Novak asserts claims of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and sex discrimination and retaliation under the New Yor

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lehner, J.), entered December 13, 1983, which, inter alia, granted the motion of third-party defendants A. I. Smith Electrical Contractors, Inc., and Aetna Insurance Company to amend their answer to assert the affirmative defense of res judicata and for summary judgment thereupon dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent appeal

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lehner, J.), entered July 2, 1984, modified, on the law, without costs, so as to grant defendant New York City Housing Authority summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action of plaintiff’s complaint, and otherwise affirmed. Plaintiff was the plumbing contractor on the Marcus Garvey public housing construction project in The Bronx. Plaintiff’s third cause of action seeks $125,000 for increased

481 F.Supp.2d 289 (2007) Scott NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. SCARBOROUGH ALLIANCE CORPORATION, Scarborough Capital Corporation, Scarborough Securities Corporation and Denis A. Cardone, both individually and in his Corporate capacity, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 4319 WCC. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 28, 2007. *290 Niedwe

785 F.Supp. 467 (1992) Frank PAGANUCCI, Mort Adler, Augustine Aloia, Louis C. Amen, Linda M. Anderson, Alfonso Andosca, Salvatore Ardizzone, Robert Arluck, Michael Armstrong, Joseph Averso, Desmond P. Bailey, S. Balestrieri, James W. Bard, Daniel Barker, Kevin Barry, Joseph Battaglia, Nicholas N. Battista, Anthony H. Benvenuto, Ken Bergman, Frank Bergstol, Thomas P. Blake, Francis Bostelman, Joseph O. Brousseau, Michael F. Bruno, Joseph Buffolino, Kevin

Matter of Matthews v New York City Tr. Auth. (2023 NY Slip Op 03894) Matter of Matthews v New York City Tr. Auth. 2023 NY Slip Op 03894 Decided on July 20, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting

26 F.Supp.2d 658 (1998) Carol NOVAK and Robert Nieman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Sally Frame KASAKS, Paul E. Francis, Joseph R. Gromek, Gerald S. Armstrong, James J. Burke, Jr., Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch Capital Partners, Inc., ML IBK Positions, Inc., Merchant Banking L.P. No. III, Kecalp, Inc., AnnTaylor Stores Corporation and Ann

997 F.Supp. 425 (1998) Carol NOVAK and Robert Nieman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Sally Frame KASAKS, Paul E. Francis, Joseph R. Gromek, Gerald S. Armstrong, James J. Burke, Jr., Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch Capital Partners, Inc., ML IBK Positions, Inc., Merchant Banking L.P. No. III, Kecalp, Inc., AnnTaylor Stores Corporation and AnnT

Matyas v New York City Dept. of Sanitation (2018 NY Slip Op 01600) Matyas v New York City Dept. of Sanitation 2018 NY Slip Op 01600 Decided on March 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York S

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 14-1688 ________________ SYED FARHAJ HASSAN; THE COUNCIL OF IMAMS IN NEW JERSEY; MUSLIM STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF THE U.S. AND CANADA, INC.; ALL BODY SHOP INSIDE & OUTSIDE; UNITY BEEF SAUSAGE COMPANY; MUSLIM FOUNDATION INC.; MOIZ MOHAMMED; JANE DOE; SOOFIA TAHIR; ZA