Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nottingham v. Clarke”
Nottingham v. Statepublic domain
SHARER, J. In January 2013, at the conclusion of a night of drinking at an Ocean City tavern, appellant, George Doran Nottingham, got into a fight with his friend, Michael Post. That fight concluded when Nottingham “sucker punched” Post, causing Post to fall and suffer fatal head injuries. An indictment was returned in the Circuit Co
Nottingham v. Statepublic domain
Judith Rogers, Judge. The appellant, Larry Nottingham, appeals his conviction of DWI, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-103 (1987). Upon conviction, his driver’s license was suspended for a period of ninety days, and he was fined $500, plus costs. On appeal, the appellant contends that it was error for the trial court to have allowed the admission of certain testimony on grounds of hearsay; that the evi
Smith v. Smith Ex Rel. Clarkepublic domain
747 A.2d 85 (1999) Hazell M. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Otis H. SMITH, by David H. CLARKE, his authorized agent and attorney-in-fact, Defendant. C.A. No. 1883. Court of Chancery of Delaware, Sussex County. Submitted: October 8, 1998. Decided: March 11, 1999. *86 Eugene H. Bayard and Veronica O. Faust of Wilson, Halbroo
Nottingham v. Clarkpublic domain
Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Smith, P. J.
Nottingham v. . Clarkpublic domain
Agree to affirm; no opinion. All concur. Judgment affirmed.
Louisville Area Inter-Faith Committee for United Farm Workers v. Nottingham Liquors, Ltd.public domain
PECK, Circuit Judge. On February 14, 1975, defendant-appellee State Circuit Court Judge Hubbs signed, at the request of defendant-appellee Nottingham Liquors, an order restraining plaintiffs-appellants, the Louisville Area InterFaith Committee for United Farms Workers (“Committee”),* from mass picketing and mass marching on or near Nottingham’s business premises; the order limited the pickets to two w
Schuyler v. Nottinghampublic domain
Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.
Schuyler v. Nottinghampublic domain
— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Crouch, J., who dissents and votes for reversal. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Nottingham v. Farmers & Merchants Trust Bankpublic domain
Eggleston, J., delivered the opinion of the court. In the year 1932, and for some time prior thereto, there were operating in Northampton county, Virginia, three banks known as The Cheriton Banking Company, Incorporated (hereinafter called the Cheriton Bank), The Townsend Banking Company, Incorporated, and the Farmers & Merchants Trust Bank. In December of that year these three banks, with the approval an
H. E. Benjamin Co. v. Nottinghampublic domain
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of People ex rel. Desiderio v. Connolly (212 App. Div. 102); Decves v. Metropolitan, etc., Co. (6 Misc. 91; afid., 141 N. Y. 587); Cassidy v. McFarland (139 id. 201); Irving v. Irving (90 Hun, 422; affd., 149 N. Y. 573). All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Schuyler v. Maude Blair Nottinghampublic domain
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.
H. E. Benjamin Co. v. Nottinghampublic domain
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Clarke v. Ripley Saving's Bank & Trust Co.public domain
I concur in the result in this case as set forth in Judge KETCHUM'S opinion, but am unable to agree to some of the rulings made therein. I agree that the chancellor erred in holding that the petitioner did not originally deposit the $2,500 in the bank. *Page 399 This deposit created the relation of debtor and creditor between him and the bank. The fact that the bank did not credit the petitioner's account with this amount is, I think, immaterial an
Habecker v. Town of Estes Park, Coloradopublic domain
452 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2006) David HABECKER and The Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO; Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado; Lori Jeffrey-Clark, Trustee of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado; Sue Doylen, Trustee of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado; Chuck Levine, Trustee of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado; Wayne Newsom, Trustee of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado; Bill Pinkham, tee of
Clark v. Hiller (In Re Hiller)public domain
232 B.R. 480 (1999) In re Fred T. HILLER III, Debtor. H. Christopher Clark, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred T. Hiller, III, et al., Defendant-Appellant. Bankruptcy No. 88 B 5775 CEM, Adversary No. 92 1049 SBB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 23, 1999. *481 Lee M. Kutner, Rubner & Kutner, P.C., Denver, CO.<
Noble v. Shalalapublic domain
870 F.Supp. 304 (1994) Greg NOBLE, Elizabeth Clark, Ronda Duran, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 92 N 2495. United States District Court, D. Colorado. November 30, 1994. *305 Linda J. Olson, Judith Caron Stein, Leg
Clark v. Hiller (In re Hiller)public domain
ORDER NOTTINGHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the “Motion to Reconsider Minute Order of August 9,1994” filed by appellant on August 16, 1994. Upon review and consideration of the motion and the file, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to reconsider is GRANTED. 2. The judgment filed in this case on July 25, 1994, 179 B.
Clark v. Hiller (In re Hiller)public domain
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION NOTTINGHAM, District Judge. This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court. The judgment was entered on December 10, 1992, after a trial concerning the trustee’s objection to the debtor’s discharge in bankruptcy under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-766 (West 1993). The bankruptcy court ruled in favor of the trustee and
United States v. Friedlandpublic domain
152 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2001) UNITED STATES of America and the State of Colorado, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants, v. Robert M. FRIEDLAND, Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Counter-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aztec Minerals Corporation, an Ohio corporation; South Mountain Minerals Corporation and Gray Eagle Mining Corporation, a Colorado Corporation, Third-Party Defendants, Counter and Cross-Claimants, and Th
Spence v. Aspen Skiing Co.public domain
820 F.Supp. 542 (1993) Lynne SPENCE and Victor Spence, Plaintiffs, v. ASPEN SKIING COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, and John Doe, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91 N 341. United States District Court, D. Colorado. May 10, 1993. Thomas Dalton McFarland, Littleton, CO, Larry D. Fowler, Fowler Tuttle Clark & Coleman, Lansing, MI, for plaintiffs. Scott S. Barker, Ho