Cases

256 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2003) Richard L. BEAMS, Plaintiff, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Defendant. No. 00-4124-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 4, 2003. *1205 Mary K. Ramirez, Jackie A. Rapstine, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) VANESSA CROWE & GLEN GALEMMO, ) on behalf of themselves and others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL Z. CROWE, No. 23-35193 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv- 02139-JR OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, and LAWRENCE K. PETERSON I, Plaintiff, v. OREGON STATE BAR, a Public Corporation; OREGON STATE BAR BOAR

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL Z. CROWE; LAWRENCE K. No. 19-35463 PETERSON I; OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS, an Oregon D.C. No. nonprofit corporation, 3:18-cv-02139- Plaintiffs-Appellants, JR v. OREGON STATE BAR, a Public Corporation; OREGON STATE BAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS; VANESSA A. NORDYKE, President of the Oregon State Bar Board of G

MEMORANDUM ORDER JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge. Defendants have moved for a six-month remand and stay of litigation in each of the 37 tribal lawsuits pending before me. See, e.g., Tohono O‘Odham Nation v. Kempthorne, 06-2236, [Dkt. 17, 18]. The plaintiff tribes all oppose the motion. The motion is fully briefed. No party has requested oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, t

01/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 25, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUSTIN RICHARD NORTON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 19-CR-299 Andrew Mark Freiberg, Judge No. E2020-01652-CCA-R3-CD The Defen

426 F.Supp.2d 1310 (2005) Samuel David CROWE, Petitioner, v. William HEAD, Warden, Respondent. No. CIV. 1:02-CV-2265ODE. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 30, 2005. *1315 Ann Grunewald Fort, Amelia Toy Rudolph, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, Robert L. McGlasson, II, Federal Defender Program

61 B.R. 258 (1986) Leo Edward NORTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOXIE STATE BANK, Defendant. No. 84-1758. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 4, 1986. *259 Dan E. Turner, Topeka, Kan., for plaintiffs. William H. Zimmerman, Jr., Wichita, Kan., Emily Metzger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Carol Park, U.S. Trustee, Wichita, Kan.,

310 F.Supp.2d 102 (2004) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 15, 2004. *103 Douglas B. Huron, Heller, Huron, Chertkof, Lerner, Simon & Salman, Washington, DC, for Special Master. Alan Lee Balaran

405 F.3d 1317 KAW NATION, Appellant,v.Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, Appellee, andKaw Nation of Oklahoma, ex rel. Guy Munroe, Wanda Stone, Guyetta Monroe-Martin, and the Kaw Nation General Council, Intervenors. No. 04-1029. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: May 2, 2005. Mich

480 P.2d 691 (1971) Bishop Lester CROWE, Pentecostal Lighthouse Church, also known as Pentecostal Gospel Lighthouse Church, Apostolic World Churches, Inc., J.B. Tidwell, James F. Blaine, Ivey D. Massey and F. Ray Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. L.A. McCULLOCH, Jr., Director of Liquor Control, Bureau of Revenue, and Barber Super Markets, Inc., d/b/a Foodway, Defendants-Appellees. No. 9089.

MEMORANDUM and ORDER LAMBERTH, District Judge. On November 14, 2001, the Special Master issued the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master Regarding the Security of Trust Data at the Department of the Interior (“Special Master Report”). On November 26, 2001, the Department of the Interior filed its response to the Special Master report arguing, inter alia, that the “clearly err

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the death of Todd Murray, a Ute tribal member, following a police pursuit on the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (the “Reservation”). Murray’s parents, his estate, and the Ute Indian Tribe (the “Tribal Plaintiffs”) sued the officers involved in Ute *1241 <

365 F.Supp.2d 394 (2005) The FUND FOR ANIMALS, Humane Society for the United States, Defenders of Wildlife, Animal Rights Foundation of Florida, Donald Feare, Gustav W. Verderber, Julie Baker, Kristi Gholson, Collette Adkins Giese, Marian Probst Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, Steven Williams, Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anne Veneman, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bobby Accord, Administrat

949 S.W.2d 672 (1997) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Verlie NORTON, Appellant. No. WD 52497. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 5, 1997. *674 Rosemary E. Percival, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for

439 So.2d 517 (1983) Karl MIRE v. Levi L. CROWE, Jr., et al. No. 82 CA 1079. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 11, 1983. *519 Frank M. RePass, III and Dolores Williams, Slidell, for plaintiff, appellee. William J. Faustermann, Jr., Ron W. Guth, Slidell, for defendant, appellant. Before PONDER, WAT

527 F.Supp.2d 130 (2007) ASSINIBOINE & SIOUX TRIBES OF the FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION v. NORTON, et al. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. Norton, et al. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Norton, et al. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Norton, et al. Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation v. Norton, et al. Yankton Sioux Tribe v. No

This suit involves the right of Tom Green County, under Art. 720, R.C.S., 1925, to redeem prior to maturity dates the outstanding portion of its Courthouse construction bonds issued in 1927, and payable serially in one to forty years. The case is ruled by the decision in Cochran County v. Mann, 141 Tex. 398, 172 S.W.2d 689, 690. The bonds were issued under the provisions of Chapters

McCULLOCH, C. J. The subject-matter of the present controversy is a tract of land in Lee County, described as the west half of the southwest quarter of section 4, in township 2 north, range 2 east, except two acres in the southwest corner thereof owned and occupied by a certain school district. The parties to the controversy claim title to the land from a common source, towit: Henry Bunch, a f

JUSTICE, PJ. One claim of error is presented, namely: In sustaining defendant’s motion for a di- • rected verdict .and in entering a judgment in his favor. In order to dispose of this claimed error, we were required to and have read the entire record. It discloses evidence tending to establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant, and also reveals, upon the issue of contributory negligence,