Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Norman Anthony Brown appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Brown’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Brown has filed a pro se supplem

MEMORANDUM ** Norman Anthony Brown appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Brown’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Brown has filed a pro se supplem

BROWN, Circuit Judge: The choppy waters of the Supreme Court’s “stream of commerce” doctrine have plagued lower courts for years. The three competing opinions in Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd., v. Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987), each offered conflicting standards for exercising personal jurisdiction over a for

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *597Before the Court are Plaintiff Nathanael Brown's ("Brown") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 31), Defendants Mid-America Apartments, LP and Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s (collectively, "MAA") Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 86), and the parties' responsive briefing to each.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 17, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00629-CR IN RE ANTHONY WHITNEY NORMAN, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Trial Court Cause No. 1248767 2

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FURTHER ENFORCEMENT CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Armstrong, et ah, move for an order for further enforcement of the 2007 injunction, applicable to all California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) prisons. They allege that Defendants Brown, et ah, continue to place Class Members in administrative segregation due to a lack of accessible

ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. In ongoing sequelae to defendants’ January 7; 2013 motion to terminate this action (hereafter “termination motion”) (ECF No. 4275), two additional motions brought by plaintiffs for enforcement of court orders and affirmative relief are before the court.1 On May 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion related to housing and treat<

805 F.Supp.2d 918 (2011) John ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants. No. C 94-2307 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 8, 2011. *919 Ariene Brynne Mayerson, Linda D. Kilb, Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, Inc., Donald H. Specter, Sara Linda Norman, Alison H

STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, THELTON E. HENDERSON, Senior District Judges. On June 20, 2013, this Court issued an Opinion and Order once again directing defendants to comply with our August 2009 Population Reduction Order by reducing the prison population to 137.5% design capacity by December 31, 2013. June 20, 2013 Op. & Order, 952 F.Supp.2d 901, 2013 WL 3326872 (E.D.Cal.2013) (ECF No. 2659/4

Motion Denied and Order filed August 30, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-11-00433-CR ____________ ANTHONY WHITNEY NORMAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee O

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR A FURTHER ENFORCEMENT ORDER AND DENYING MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN.CONTEMPT OF COURT (Docket No. 2236) CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs move to enforce, and hold Defendants in contempt for violating, the Court’s prior orders, on the' basis that Defendants have consistently failed to provide sign language interpreters (SLIs) during education and vocational programs at

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANTS TO TRACK AND ACCOMMODATE NEEDS OF ARMSTRONG CLASS MEMBERS HOUSED IN COUNTY JAILS, ENSURE ACCESS TO A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE, AND TO ENFORCE 2001 PERMANENT INJUNCTION (Docket No. 1912) CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs move for an order requiring Defendants to track and accommodate the needs of Armstrong class members hou

356 S.C. 496 (2003) 589 S.E.2d 781 The STATE, Respondent, v. Anthony Jerome BROWN, Appellant. No. 3702. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard November 4, 2003. Decided November 24, 2003. *499 Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of SC Office of Appellate Defense, of Colum

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 20, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00433-CR ANTHONY WHITNEY NORMAN, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

OPINION William J, Boyce, Justice , ■ This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant Rey Garza’s motion to dismiss filed pursuant to-Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 101.106(f). The principal, issue presented is whether Garza, a police officer for a city- in Grimes County, was acting within the scope of his e

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION Cause number and style: 01–12–00862–CV; Knife River Corp.-South v. Hinojosa Date motions filed: July 21, 2014 Party filing motions: Appellee It is ordered that Appellee’s Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is denied. It is so ORDERED. Justice’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 15, 2005 Session DAVID ANTHONY NORMAN v. MELISSA DAWN NORMAN Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 27201 R.E. Lee Davies, Chancellor No. M2004-00738-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 31, 2005 In this third appeal from a Williamson Co

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 11, 2002 Session DAVID ANTHONY NORMAN v. MELISSA DAWN NORMAN Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 27201 Russ Heldman, Chancellor No. M2001-02796-COA-R3-CV- Filed March 4, 2003 This appeal arises from a divorce proceeding. The trial court, finding the Husband

19 Cal.App.4th 454 (1993) 24 Cal. Rptr.2d 117 JESSIE LOUISE VICTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. B065856. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two. October 13, 1993. *456 COUNSEL Cooper, Brown, Kardaras & Schar

HAGEL, Judge: On August 29, 2003, the appellant, Norman H. Sthele, who was unrepresented, filed with the Court a Notice of Appeal seeking review of a December 19, 2002, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board denied him an effective date prior to December 20, 1991, for his service-connected low-back disability. In his Notice of-Appeal, he wrote that he “[d