⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Norma Levy Shapiro”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983-05-12 · Published · cited 20× · 704 F.2d 1222; 52 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5072; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28066
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: Norma Williams brought this action in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida under I.R.C. § 7429(b)(1). 1 The district court entered a final judgment of dismissal for lack of venue because Norma Williams, the appellant, is an alien. Williams argues that such a holding unconstitu
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 380 So. 2d 572; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15651
BERANEK, Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal involving an order by the trial court allowing plaintiff/appellee to deposit rents relating to a condominium recreation lease into the court registry pending the outcome of litigation between the parties. We consider this appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B). Appellant, the defendant and developer of the condominium, contends
Jahn v. Jahnpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 577 So. 2d 622; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2351; 1991 WL 35329
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980); Thibodeau v. Thibodeau, 461 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Illinois Supreme Court · 2004-10-28 · Published · cited 211× · 819 N.E.2d 714; 212 Ill. 2d 489; 289 Ill. Dec. 218; 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1619
819 N.E.2d 714 (2004) 212 Ill.2d 489 289 Ill.Dec. 218 In re MARRIAGE OF Norma Perez de BATES, Appellant, and R. Edward Bates, Appellee. No. 97059. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 28, 2004. *716 Paul L. Feinstein, Chicago, for appellant. Joel D. Arnold, of Fortunato, Farrell, Daven
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 187 Pa. Super. 512; 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 705; 144 A.2d 584
Opinion by Ervin, J., This is an appeal by the defendant transportation company from the refusal of its motion for judgment n.o.v. in a trespass action. We are obliged to consider the testimony, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff: Stewart v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 379 Pa. 260, 108 A. 2d 767. Accordingly, the facts may be
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004-08-10 · Published · cited 83× · 378 F.3d 60; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16424; 2004 WL 1775102
ROSENN, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal raises an interesting question relating to the importance for a debtor to maintain and preserve the debtor’s financial records for a reasonable period prior to filing for bankruptcy to allow the bankruptcy court to make an intelligent *63 inquiry of the debto
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1992-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 147 B.R. 267
ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FDIC’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY TRUSTEE’S COUNSEL ARONOVITZ, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the FDIC’s Motion to Disqualify Trustee’s Counsel, Whitman & Ransom, and four individual attorneys at Whitman & Ransom, file dated August 4, 1992. THE COURT has considered the motion, responses, the pertinent portions of the record, and or
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 3, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010-03-31 · Published · cited 15× · 706 F. Supp. 2d 266; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31601
706 F.Supp.2d 266 (2010) STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, Shannon Hemmingsen, Samuel Rivera, Gale Yencha, Norma Jean Diaz, And Agatha Johnson, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Michael P. Starkowski, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Social Services, Thomas A. Kirk, Jr., PhD., in hi
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995-10-30 · Published · cited 2× · 903 F. Supp. 852; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16344; 1995 WL 643434
903 F.Supp. 852 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Steven SCHWARTZ. No. 88-00215-01. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 30, 1995. Michael Levy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Defender Ass'n of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for U.S. Steven Schwartz, Plymouth Meeting, PA, pro se. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Ambrose v. Malcolmpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1977-11-22 · Published · cited 1× · 440 F. Supp. 51; 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12791
440 F.Supp. 51 (1977) Guy Zepth AMBROSE, Luis Gilces, Faruk Abdul Ghani, and Johnny Johnson, detainees of the Bronx House of Detention for Men, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Benjamin J. MALCOLM, Commissioner of Correction of the City of New York, Robert Kirton, Deputy Warden-in-Command, Bronx House of Detention for Men, and Abraham D. Beame, Mayor of the City of New York, Individually and in th
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972-01-04 · Published · cited 2× · 337 F. Supp. 791; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15719
337 F.Supp. 791 (1972) In the Matter of PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Debtor. Petition of DETROIT BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Liquidating Trustee. No. 70-347. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. January 4, 1972. *792 Blank, Rome, Klaus & Comisky by Gilbert Stein, and Goncer M. Krestal, and Eugene Anderson, Carl H
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 335 F. Supp. 840; 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10730
In Proceedings for the Reorganization of a Railroad OPINION AND ORDER NO. 497 FULLAM, District Judge. The Trustees are the owners of, inter alia, 161,698 shares of the common stock *841of the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (“P&LE”), pledged as collateral under two collateral trust indentures, dated April
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-07-18 · Published · cited 114× · 760 F.3d 1070; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13733; 2014 WL 3537847
KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-06-03 · Published · cited 27× · 824 F.3d 1207; 2016 WL 3126203
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. We are asked to take a second look at this case to consider the effect of the Supreme Court’s intervening opinion in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015) (hereinafter “Arizona”). See Hickenlooper v. Kerr, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2927, 192 L.Ed.2d 956 (2015). In Arizona, the Supreme Court held that the Arizona Legislatur
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-03-07 · Published · cited 18× · 744 F.3d 1156; 2014 WL 889445
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Article IV, § 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees to the State of Colorado a “Republican Form of Government.” It provides: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004-06-21 · Published · cited 2× · 322 F. Supp. 2d 603; 93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2816; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11557; 2004 WL 1401236
322 F.Supp.2d 603 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. PHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS No. CIV.A. 03-4254. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 21, 2004. *604 Gregory S. Hrebiniak, Jonathan D. Carroll, U.S. Dept of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Peter Goldberger, Ardm
District Court, S.D. California · 1990-03-12 · Published · cited 3× · 733 F. Supp. 1387; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10649; 1990 WL 37602
733 F.Supp. 1387 (1990) STEBCO, INC., a California Corporation, Rafael Carrillo-Barron, an individual, Norma Fregoso Carrillo, an individual, Construcciones Industriales Otay, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Edificaciones Industriales Omar, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Concretos Ati, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Agregados Tijuana, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Ferreteria El Clavo, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Plaintiff
District Court, S.D. New York · 1995-08-18 · Published · cited 10× · 896 F. Supp. 1339
896 F.Supp. 1339 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants. In re Government's Application to Enjoin Plaintiffs in Darrow v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 94 Civ. 02113 (D.D.C.) (RJ), From Prosecuting That Case in Any Court or Forum Other Than This Court. No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE).
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997-03-19 · Published · cited 6× · 958 F. Supp. 1320; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3377; 1997 WL 128917
958 F.Supp. 1320 (1997) HISPANICS UNITED OF DUPAGE COUNTY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VILLAGE OF ADDISON, ILLINOIS, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF ADDISON, ILLINOIS, Defendant. Nos. 94 C 6075, 95 C 3926. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 19, 1997. *1321 Rob