Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Nordic Naturals, Inc. v. J. R. Carlson Laboratories, Inc.”
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
State v. Bloompublic domain
OPINION KEITH, Chief Justice. Agreeing with the state on the central issue in each of three separate criminal appeals decided today,1 we hold, first, that the National Research Council’s recent adoption of the conservative “interim ceiling method” for computation of the probability that a randomly selected person would have the same DNA profile as that of a sample of bodily fluid
Dow Chemical Co. v. Department of Revenuepublic domain
832 N.E.2d 284 (2005) 359 Ill. App.3d 1 295 Ill.Dec. 133 The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, and Glen L. Bower, Director of the Department of Revenue, Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. No. 1-03-1657. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. Ju
Dow Chemical Co. v. Department of Revenuepublic domain
FIRST DIVISION June 27, 2005 No. 1-03-1657 THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, ) Cook County. ) v. )