⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Nora G. Robinson”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-08-10 · Published · cited 4× · 832 F.3d 726
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. In each of these consolidated cases, a debt collector filed a proof of claim, defined as “a written statement setting forth a creditor’s claim,” Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(a), for a time-barred debt in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. After successfully objecting to the proof of claim, the debtor sued the debt collector in federal court, alleging that the act of filing a proof of claim on a stale debt viol
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 223× · 83 A.3d 901; 623 Pa. 564
Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. As I read the Brief for Cross-Appellants (denominated by the lead opinion as “citizens,” albeit they are largely municipalities), as it pertains to their challenge to Act 13 under Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the main argument is that the General Assembly has inappropriately deprived municipalities of the means to fulfill their own constitutional obligatio
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2002-03-12 · Published · cited 26× · 641 N.W.2d 401; 10 Neb. Ct. App. 968; 2002 Neb. App. LEXIS 71
641 N.W.2d 401 (2002) 10 Neb. App. 968 Nathaniel ROBINSON, Appellant, v. NABCO, INC., Appellee. No. A-00-1146. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. March 12, 2002. *404 Phillip G. Wright and Sean C. Bradley, of Quinn & Wright, Omaha, for appellant. Nora M. Kane, of Domina Law, P.C., Omaha, for appellee
Robinson v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Delaware · 2015-10-05 · Published · cited 3× · 137 F. Supp. 3d 630; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135319; 2015 WL 5838469
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Karen Robinson (‘plaintiff) appeals from a decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (‘defendant*), denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (‘DlB‘) and Supplemental Security Income (‘SSI‘) under Titles II and XVI, respectively, of the Social Security Act (the ‘Act‘) prior to August 1, 20
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0974-15 PD-0974-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/28/2015 5:49:16 PM Accepted 7/29/2015 11:43:56 AM
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2018-11-29 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-17-00143-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CHRISTOPHER G. PEREZ AND BLUE MARIACHI PRODUCTIONS, LLC., Appellants, v. ABRAHAM QUINTANILLA, JR., AN INDIVIDUAL Appellee. On appeal from the 148th Distr
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 11, 2002 Session NORA FAYE YOUNG v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 99-A-403 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge No. M2002-00804-CCA-R3-PC - Filed June 4, 2003 The petitioner appeals after being denied post-conviction relief. She o
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 19× · 298 S.W.3d 663; 2009 WL 1801492
298 S.W.3d 663 (2009) Abel LUCIO, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. The JOHN G. AND MARIE STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION, Appellee. No. 13-08-00077-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. June 25, 2009. Rehearing Overruled September 17, 2009. *665 Charles B. Frye, Lindeman & Frye, Houston, TX, fo
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2020-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-19-00556-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CITY OF BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS, Appellant, v. WESLEY RATTRAY, MARCO NUNEZ, MARTHA SAAVEDRA, ANTONIO VINDELL, CARMEN PASHOS, STEVE TULLOS, CESARIO PEDRAZA AND MINERVA PEDRAZA, ROGER LULY, NORA GONZALEZ, AND ROSALINDA CASTILLO, Appellees.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-00077-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIS
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019-03-15 · Published · cited 13× · 373 F. Supp. 3d 567
Nora Barry Fischer, United States District Judge *573I. INTRODUCTION This diversity action arises from a business arrangement between an architectural/engineering design management company, Defendant Jacobs Engineering Group ("Jacobs"), and a manufacturer which specializes in the custom design and fabrication of hangar doors, P
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 502 F. Supp. 2d 1347; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54027; 2007 WL 2068113
502 F.Supp.2d 1347 (2007) In Re C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., OVERTIME PAY LITIGATION. No. MDL 1849. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. July 12, 2007. *1348 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr.,[*] KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, Ju
District Court, D. Delaware · 2010-08-12 · Published · cited 18× · 730 F. Supp. 2d 349; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82013; 2010 WL 3187025
730 F.Supp.2d 349 (2010) XPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 09-628-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 12, 2010. *350 David J. Margules, Esquire, and Sean M. Brennecke, Esquire of Bouchard Margules & Friedlander, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Counsel for Plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998-08-17 · Published · cited 6× · 152 F.3d 507
OPINION BORMAN, District Judge. Defendant James D. Robinson, Jr., appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court on his pleas of guilty to wire fraud and mail fraud. At issue is whether the district judge erred in (1) imposing a 2-level enhancement under the “Vulnerable Victim” U.S. Sentencing Guideline, § 3Al.l(b), and (2) in denying a 2- or 3-
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 29, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TRAMELLA HINTON, as general * PUBLISHED guardian of SHAWN’QUAVIOUS * A’DREZ HINTON, * * Petitioner, * No. 16-1140V
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997-09-02 · Published · cited 14× · 975 F. Supp. 1317; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13970
975 F.Supp. 1317 (1997) W.L.G., a minor, and Nora Riley, Plaintiffs, v. HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-T-859-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 2, 1997. *1318 Gregory B. McCain, Bobbie S. Crook, Byrd, Spencer & McCain, Dothan, AL, for plaintiffs.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009-03-20 · Published · cited 2× · 627 F. Supp. 2d 656; 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20071; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26647; 2009 WL 799976
627 F.Supp.2d 656 (2009) In Re KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION. Pertains to: Robinson C.A. No. 06-2268. Civil Action No. 05-4182. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. March 20, 2009. *661 Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Becnel Law Firm, LLC, Reserve, LA, Jonathan Beauregard Andry, The Andry Law Firm, Brian Arthur Gilbe
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2019-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-0593V Filed: August 28, 2019 **************************** JEFFREY SCHAFER, * * Petitioner, * v. * Vaccine Act; Fact Ruling; * Six Mon
White v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Delaware · 2015-12-11 · Published · cited 1× · 150 F. Supp. 3d 361; 2015 WL 8549596; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165961
*362MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William W. White (“plaintiff’), who proceeds pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, seeks judicial review of a decision of the Social Security Administration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Presently before the court is a motion to dis
Stevens v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Delaware · 2017-01-12 · Published · cited 2× · 232 F. Supp. 3d 605; 2017 WL 123455; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4603
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Erwin D. Stevens (“plaintiff”), who proceeds pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, seeks judicial review of a decision of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.