Cases

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL EL PUEBLO DE Apelación PUERTO RICO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelado Instancia, Sala Superior de Ponce

255 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2001) NOEL PUENTE GOMEZ; LEE MAZUR HAYS; BOB JONES; ALFREDO ROMAN; PATRICK HALL; MARQ BARTLETT; GREGORY JOSEPH NELSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,v.RICHARD A. VERNON, DIRECTOR, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DAVE PASKETT, WARDEN, IDAHO STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JAMES C. SPALDING, DIRECTOR, IDOC; JOE KLAUSER, WARDEN, ISCI; DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,ALAN LEE BRANDT, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR-APPELLANT,v.EUGENE STA

705 F.Supp.2d 138 (2010) Diego SÁNCHEZ-RUIZ, Plaintiff v. FERGUSON OF PUERTO RICO, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 09-1373 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 26, 2010. *140 Godwin Aldarondo-Girald, Esq., Aldarondo-Girald Law Office, Laura Maldonado-Rodriguez, Esq., Laura Maldonado Law Office, San Jua

GARDNER, J., This matter comes before the court on Application for Appointment of Arbitrator brought by petitioners, Laborers’ District Council of Eastern Pennsylvania and Local 1174, Laborers’ International Union of North America, AFL-CIO (petitioners). The application is made pursuant to section 73051. of the Uniform Arbitra-1 tion Act.2 Resp

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This case exemplifies antagonism toward prisoner litigation at the cost of constitutional rights and legal ethics. While all may be fair in war,1 such is not the case in the judicial arena — the courtroom is not a battlefield. After a nineteen-day trial, the district court, Magistrate Judge Boyle presiding, found that the Idaho Department of Corrections, two of its penal i

OPINION CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: Six defendants appeal their criminal convictions stemming from a widespread criminal enterprise offering illegal private investigation services in Southern California. *981At the center of this criminal enterprise was Pellicano Investigative Agency, known as PIA. Defendant Anthony Pellicano operated PIA, ostensibl

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Chief District Judge CHRISTENSEN ORDER The opinion filed August 25, 2015 is hereby amended as follows: The last paragraph on page 41 through the last paragraph on page 43 of the slip opinion should be removed and replaced with the following: The main theory of Kachikian’s defense was that Kachikian lacked the required criminal intent because he bel

433 F.Supp. 1047 (1977) John J. DeMARINES and Doris A. DeMarines, husband and wife v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES. Civ. A. No. 74-653. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. June 28, 1977. *1048 *1049 James E. Beasley, Beasley, Hewson, Casey, Kraft & Colleran, Philadelphia, Pa., fo