Cases

Opinion filed April 18, 2019 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-17-00103-CR __________ NOE LOPEZ TREVINO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 42nd District Court Ta

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Noe Lopez Trevino, * From the 42nd District Court of Taylor County Trial Court No. 26485A. Vs. No. 11-17-00103-CR * April 18, 2019 The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by

NUMBER 13-14-00242-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARIA DEL ROSARIO CORTINAS, Appellant, v. NOE LOPEZ, Appellee. On appeal from the 24th District Court of

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-14-00242-CV Maria Del Rosario Cortinas v. Noe Lopez On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3 of Cameron County, Texas Trial Cause No. 2010-CCL-01117 JUDGMENT THE THIRTE

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Noe Lopez-Vargas pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and to one count of criminal forfeiture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 853. He was sentenced by the district court 1 to 108 months’ impris

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Noe Lopez-Gonzalez (Lopez-Gonzalez) was convicted, on a conditional plea of guilty under Rule 11(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, of possession of more than one hundred kilograms of marihuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). In this appeal from his conviction, Lopez-Gonz

MEMORANDUM ** Noe Lopez-Torres (“Lopez”) petitions this court for review of a Board of Immi*980gration Appeals (“BIA”) decision finding Lopez ineligible for discretionary relief under Immigration and Naturalization Act (“INA”) § 212(c) and adjustment of status under INA § 245. We grant Lopez’s petition -with regard to INA § 212(c) and remand this

Appellee brought suit for wrongful discharge and for violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1981). Trial was before a jury and appellee was awarded $182,301.87 as damages, plus prejudgment interest and attorney fees, from the appellants. Further, appellee recovered $50,000.00 in exemplary damages from appellant Noe. Appellant brings fifteen points of error. We affirm in part, and reverse and render in part. Noe is the city manager of Kingsville, Texas. In

MEMORANDUM** Noe Alfonso Morales-Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of deportation, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial e

MEMORANDUM** Noe Martin Rodas-Lopez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rodas-Lopez argues *611that his plea hearing did not satisfy the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(f) because the district court failed to establish the factual basis for his plea. Specifically, h

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 87-1-04306-8, Arthur E. Piehler, J., entered February 12, 1988. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Pekelis, J., concurred in by Grosse, A.C.J., Winsor, J., dissenting.

MEMORANDUM ** Noe Zamarron-Lopez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Zamarron-Lopez’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Zamarron-Lopez did not file a pro se sup

NUMBER 13-20-00320-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG EX PARTE CARLOS NOE GALLEGOS On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandu

NUMBER 13-13-00627-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG NOE ADRIAN SALINAS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Rogers. Wilkins, Circuit Judge: *329Appellants-Yester Ayala (aka "Freeway" or "Daddy Yankee"), Noe Machado-Erazo (aka "Gallo"), and Jose Martinez-Amaya (aka "Crimen" or "Mecri")-were charged with conspiracy to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") statute,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOE MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ, AKA No. 19-72681 Eloy Medina-Rodriguez, AKA Noe Rodrigues-Medina, Agency No. Petitioner, A041-848-597 v. OPINION WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Pet

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 10, 2018 Decided August 17, 2018 Reissued September 9, 2022 No. 15-3040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. NOE MACHADO-ERAZO, ALSO KNOWN AS GALLO, ALSO KNOWN AS NOE MARCHADO-ERAZO, APPELLANT Consolidated with 1

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 3, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-01008-CR MARTIN NOE MUZQUIZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Cour

JOHNSON, J. Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's judgment sustaining Defendants' exceptions of no right of action, no cause of action, prematurity and improper cumulation of parties and dismissing their suit without prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and amend in part. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs, Helen Lopez Languirand and L. Lopez's Sons

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge {1} Defendant, Fabian Lopez, was convicted of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, following a workplace altercation. Defendant raises multiple issues on appeal, including whether the over two hundred day delay between conviction and sentencing violated due process. As an issue of first impression, we conclude that Defendant failed to show prejudice and that