Cases

FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Early one morning, thirteen-year-old Betty 1 told her school bus driver that her father, James Graham, had sexually abused her the night before. Betty said Graham entered the bathroom while she was showering and, later that night, came in to her bedroom and forced her to perform o

JOHNSON, Judge, CONCURRING IN PART, CONCURRING IN RESULT ONLY IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART. I concur with the Majority Opinion except for two issues. As to the dismissal of the appellants’ claims against Alan Coleman, Jeremy Ellis, Matthew Barnett, Michael Alonso, James O’Nan and Toby Nace, I respectfully dissent. I believe there is a genuine issue as to a material fact concer

By Judge Jerome James This matter came before the Court on April 26, 2011, for a three-day consolidated trial on the parties’ Complaints. Builders by Design, L.L.C. (hereinafter “Builders”) has filed a Complaint for breach of contract by the homeowner, Mr. Robert Wilson. Wilson also filed a Complaint against Builders in which he seeks damages for breach of contract and fraud by Builders. The cases were consolidated for trial

McGEE, Judge. The City of Wilson (Plaintiff), pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 136 of the North Carolina General Statutes, filed a complaint on 30 June 2008, to acquire by condemnation a portion of real property owned by The Batten Family, L.L.C. (Defendant) in order to obtain a utility easement.1 Plaintiff sought a permanent easement of right-of-way to “construct,

WALKER, Judge. Plaintiff filed a claim on 13 December 1996 seeking benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act for a back injury she sustained on 22 September 1994 while employed by defendant. Following a hearing, a deputy commissioner concluded that plaintiffs claim was barred by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-24(a) as it existed at the time of her injury and denied her claim for benefits. On appeal, the Full Commission (Commission)

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Decision and Order, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the brief before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission adopts in part and reverses in part the Decision and Order of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The F

USCA11 Case: 23-12550 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 02/18/2025 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12550 ____________________ JAMES H. WILSON, III,

Upon review of the record with respect to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission modifies and adopts the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. ************ The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as: STIPULATIONS 1. The parti

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00445-COA SUSAN C. CUTRER, RICHARD MICHAEL APPELLANTS SAUCIER, BARBARA JAMES, SHERMAN MILLER, KAREN REEVES, AND MICHAEL REEVES v. SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES D. BELL COURT FROM WHICH APPE

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in so much of the panel decision as concludes that the district court acted within its discretion in excluding testimony regarding police protocols and prior instances in which Officer Wilson feed his weapon. See Majority Op., ante at 152-54. I respectfully dissent, however, from t

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY OF SAN DIEGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 4); AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER R. HAYS’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 14) Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge Plaintiff Melanie Wilson commenced this action against Defendants Christopher R. Hays and the City of San Diego on May 13, 201

WILLIAMS, J. Peerless Insurance Company (Peerless), Montgomery Mutual Insurance Company (Montgomery), and Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco) (collectively “the Insurers”) appeal the circuit court’s denial of their motions to dismiss the claims and compel arbitration in fourteen related actions. The Insurers argue the court erred in (1) ruling no valid contract containing *405

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. |,The relator filed suit against his former attorney for allegedly committing malpractice by advising him to agree to a plea agreement in a federal criminal case. The trial court first held that the attorney’s actions committed on or after being admitted pro hac vice were perempted pursuant to La. R.S. 9:5605, and allowed the relator to amend his petition. Subsequently, the trial court conducted

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Appellant (Aylward at Fenton Place) on the 30th day of May 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is "Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December

GEATHERS, J.: In this declaratory judgment action, Appellants, Vivian Atkins, Robert Frick, and Kay Hollis, a majority of the members of Chapin Town Council, seek review of the circuit court’s order granting the motion of Respondents, Mayor James Wilson, Jr. and Councilman Gregg White, to invalidate actions taken by Appellants at two special Council meetings. Appellants also initially challenged the circuit court’s order denyi

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. hThe plaintiff/appellant, Mark J. Titus (“Mr. Titus”), has appealed a judgment that granted a peremptory exception of prescription in favor of defendants /appel-lees, Tim D, Wilson, Sr. and Tim D. Wilson Investigations, Inc. (collectively “Mr. Wilson”), which dismissed Mr. Wilson from *257this litigation. After reviewing the record and the a

Lundberg Stratton, J. {¶ 1} The question before the court today is whether a divorce decree that provides for the issuance of a qualified domestic relations order (“QDRO”) is a final, appealable order before the QDRO is issued. Because we hold that it is, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause for further proceedings. Facts {¶ 2} Douglas J. Wilson, plaintiff-a

Order issued December 2, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-21-00656-CV RHONDA SMITH, Appellant V. JOSHUA WILSON, MELANIE WILSON , JAMES WILSON, MARK WILSON, DEBRA WILSON AND TRINITY CFT LLC, Appellees O

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Plaintiff Matthew James Wilson seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) in which she denied Plaintiffs applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This Court has jur

ORDER PER CURIAM: John Duvall appeals dismissal of his First Amended Civil Rights Petitiori in the Circuit Court of Cole County. He raises two points on appeal, asserting the circuit court clearly erred in: (1) dismissing Du-vall’s Counts 1, 2, and 3 for being beyond the statute of limitations because the circuit court failed to find the statute of limitations should have been tolled; and (2) dismissing D