Cases

BERREY, Presiding Judge. Defendant was charged as a prior offender with conspiracy to steal property of a value of at least $150 by means of deceit, a class D felony. The trial court found defendant to be a prior offender pursuant to § 558.016 RSMo 1986, and the jury found him guilty of the charged offense. He was sentenced to four (4) years imprisonment in the State Department of Corrections. He now appeals his conviction and

665 F.Supp. 729 (1987) Ron FOGLE, Christine Lee Fogle, a Minor; by Ron Fogle as Best Friend, Plaintiffs, v. BENTON COUNTY SCAN, Debbie Lutke, Silvia Geddes, Dorothy Turner, Department of Human Services, Helen Beard, Benton County Sunshine School, Joan Henn, Susan Klooz, Defendants. Civ. No. 87-5022. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. July 20, 19

BLUE, Judge. A.P., a child, appeals his adjudication of delinquency and disposition. A.P. argues that the trial court erred in denying an opportunity for him and his mother to be heard prior to disposition. We agree and reverse. A.P. entered a plea of no contest to carrying a weapon on school property. At the disposition hearing, A.P.’s attorney stated that the child and his mother were present to explain

Gen. 111] 111 COUNTIES COMMISSIONER COUNTY POWERS – WHETHER COMMISSIONER COUNTIES MAY PROVIDE FOR A DIFFERENT DEFINITION OF “NEWSPAPER” THAN PROVIDED IN SECTION 1-113 OF THE GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE – WHETHER A CHANGE IN THE DEFINITION OF “NEWSPAPER” WOULD BE AN “ADMINISTRATIVE ACT” THAT COULD BE TAKEN WITHOUT A PUBLIC HEARING November 5, 2021 The Honorable James Randy G

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

JUDGE PRYOR delivered the opinion op the court. James M. Fogle died some years since in the county of Marion, leaving his widow and five children surviving him; four of these children were by his first and one by his last wife. He left a last will and testament by which he made suitable provision for his widow and the child by her, and gave the balance of his estate to his four children by the first marriage.

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge. We find no merit in any of the issues raised in this Anders appeal except as concerns a scrivener’s error on the judgment and the assessment of investigatory costs. We therefore affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence without discussion. In addition to trafficking in cocaine (Count I), appellant was also convicted of loitering and prowling (Count II), and resis

PATTERSON, Judge. The appellant challenges his judgment and sentences for attempted armed robbery, carrying a concealed firearm, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues that he cannot be convicted of both carrying a concealed firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon because the offenses occurred during the same incident. We affirm his convictions on the basis of State v. Maxwell, 68

PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Maureen Maguire, M.D. (Dr. Maguire), challenges the circuit court’s order denying her motion for summary judgment. Dr. Maguire claims that the plaintiffs/respondents, Dorothy Nichols and Dale Nichols (Nichols), failed to provide “a verified written medical expert opinion” as required by section 766.203, Florida Statutes (1995), at the time of filing the notice of intent to initiate a medical malprac

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge. Counsel for Bobby Taylor has filed an Anders1 brief suggesting three issues for our review. After careful consideration, we have found no error in the court’s denial of his motion to suppress his confession, and affirm. We strike the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it is a discretionary cost not ann

HALL, Judge. The appellant, Bobby Adams, contends that the trial court was under the erroneous impression that it was required to impose life sentences due to Adams’s habitual offender status. He further contends that the trial court erred when it sentenced him as a habitual violent felony offender as to his convictions relating to his violation of probation. We agree with both contentions. The state conc

GREGORY, Chief Judge: This appeal arises from a condemnation proceeding commenced by Appellee Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC ("MVP"). MVP is a natural gas company that was authorized by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") to exercise the right of eminent domain in order to construct a pipeline. The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia granted MVP partial summary judgment on its right

[Cite as State v. Tackett, 2013-Ohio-4286.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2012-A-0015 - vs - : DALE L. TACKETT,

*290OPINION PER CURIAM. Verlin Alexander appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his civil rights action. We will summarily affirm. I. On June 11, 2009, Alexander filed a pro se civil rights action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against United States Marshal Orlan

*290OPINION PER CURIAM. Verlin Alexander appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his civil rights action. We will summarily affirm. I. On June 11, 2009, Alexander filed a pro se civil rights action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against United States Marshal Orlan

Ciklin, J. After an inmate at a correctional facility was disciplined for violating the inmate code of conduct by attacking a corrections officer, the state charged him with battery on a law enforcement officer. The inmate moved to dismiss the information, arguing that the criminal charge was precluded by double jeopardy principles. The trial court granted th

ALTENBERND, Acting Chief Judge. Boyd Aycock appeals his judgments for purchase and possession of cocaine. He pleaded nolo contendere, reserving his right to appeal the denial of a dispositive motion to suppress. We reverse because the police officers did not have a founded suspicion of criminal activity justifying the stop.1 Officers from the Tampa Police Department observed M

PER CURIAM: The David Bryte plaintiffs commenced this products liability action against Sunbeam Products, Inc. and American Household, Inc. (formerly Sunbeam Corporation) (the “Sunbeam defendants”) to recover damages resulting from a house fire caused by an allegedly defective Sunbeam brand “electrically-heated throw.” Counsel for the Bryte plaintiffs are also counsel for plaintiffs in numerous other similar actions across the

163 S.W.3d 389 (2005) Dr. Robin FANKHAUSER, in Her Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Fayette County Public Schools; and Board of Education of Fayette County, Kentucky, Appellants, v. Melinda COBB; Dr. Wilmer S. Cody, in His Official Capacity as the State School Officer; Rose Skepple, in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the Hearing Tribunal; Tim Hockensmith, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the Hearing Tribunal; Wanda Waldridge

ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a motion for summary judgment brought by defendant John Hancock Insurance Company USA (“John Hancock”), docket no. 37, and a cross-motion for partial summary judgment brought by plaintiffs Graham-Bingham Irrevocable Trust (the “Trust”) and trustee Henry Dean, docket no. 43. Having reviewed all papers filed in support of, and i