Cases

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ECF No. 249. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs bring this putative class action on behalf of all participants, former participants, and beneficiaries of the Dignity Health Pension Plan ("the Dignity Plan" or "t

JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge This case involves the propriety and application of a non-compete agreement. John Lavin worked for CVS Pharmacy, Inc. as a senior executive for 27 years. He signed a Restrictive Covenant Agreement ("Agreement") in 2017. Within two years of signing the Agreement, Mr. Lavin resigned from CVS and started employment with the PillPack unit of Amazon ("PillPack"). CVS s

MEMORANDUM RULING PATRICIA MINALDI, District Judge. Before the court is a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. 10], filed by the defendants, CITGO Petroleum Corporation (“CITGO”) and Fidelity Invest*557ments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (“Fidelity”). The motion is opposed by the plaintiff, Mary Nixon [Doc. 14]. CIT

OPINION ROSENTHAL, District Judge: This is an appeal from the dismissal of a putative class action filed in a California federal district court. The dismissal was based on a Massachusetts federal district court’s final judgment certifying a nationwide class and approving a class settlement. A class member who appeared

OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. National Health Resources Corporation (NHRC) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of TBF Financial, LLC (TBF) asserting, in four issues, that the trial court did not have subject *127 matter ju

368 F.Supp.2d 635 (2005) Kevin NIXON and Brandon Ancelet Plaintiffs, v. Buryl WHEATLEY and P D George Company, Defendants. No. 1:05-CV-051. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. March 24, 2005. *636 *637 Craig J. Schexnaider, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiffs. Michael

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Leon Zacharowicz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees Nassau Health Care Corporation and Nassau University Medical Center (collectively “the hospital”) in his action alleging discriminatory retaliation, discriminatory discharge, failure to accommodate, and hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Leon Zacharowicz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees Nassau Health Care Corporation and Nassau University Medical Center (collectively “the hospital”) in his action alleging discriminatory retaliation, discriminatory discharge, failure to accommodate, and hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

[Cite as Meranda Nixon Estate Wine, L.L.C. v. Cherry Fork Farm Supply Co., 2024-Ohio-1523.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BROWN COUNTY MERANDA NIXON ESTATE WINE, LLC, : et al., : CASE NO. CA2023-01-002 Appellants, : OPI

236 F.Supp.2d 211 (2002) William AIKEN; and Disability Advocates, Inc. on behalf of all present and future patients of the Capital District Psychiatric Center who are subject to unlawful strip searches and body cavity searches, Plaintiffs, v. Jesse NIXON Jr., in his official capacity as Director of the Capital District Psychiatric Center and individually; Capital District Psychiatric Center, a public entity; and Gail Bellinger-Alleman, Thomas Des

234 F.Supp.2d 185 (2002) Syed T. AHMAD, Plaintiff, v. NASSAU HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, Anthony Angelo and Jacob Sokol, Defendant(s). No. 00 CV-7549(TCP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 12, 2002. *186 *187 Alan Wolin, Wolin & Wolin, Jericho, NY, for Plaintiff. A

325 F.Supp.2d 991 (2004) REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ST. LOUIS REGION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeremiah W. NIXON, et al., Defendants. No. 99-04231-CV-C-SOW. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division. July 9, 2004. Arthur A. Benson, Jamie Kathryn Lansford, Arthur Benson & Associates, Curtis E. Woods, Sonnensc

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. This is another installment in the Brand Name Prescription Drugs saga. Many purchasers of prescription drugs accused the manufacturers and wholesalers of violating the antitrust laws. Some of the claims have been tried; others have been the subject of summary judgment. See In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Lit

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 01-4049 & 01-4050 Abbott Laboratories, Zeneca, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Corp., and CVS Revco D.S., Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Nos. 01 C 2772 and 01 C 2784--Charles P. Kocoras, Judge. Argued April 19, 2002--Decided May 15, 2002 Before Bauer, Posner, and Easterbro

PRYOR, Senior Judge: In a complaint filed in Superior Court alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties, and other tortious acts, appel-lee Lawrence K. Beaupre, a former editor of The Cincinnati Enquirer newspaper, sued the Enquirer, Gannett Satellite Network, and other parties for actions, which he asserts, ultimately caused the unlawful *36

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

12/10/2021 4:36:57 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 21-463.pdf 21-463_new.pdf versus 48 pages (330 KB) 48 pages (36

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued July 7, 2025 Decided August 13, 2025 No. 25-5097 GLOBAL HEALTH COUNCIL, ET AL., APPELLEES v. DONALD J. TRUMP, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 25-5098 Appeals from the Uni