Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nina Page Henry”
NINA SEIGELSTEIN VS. SHREWSBURY MOTORS, INC. (L-4072-15, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)public domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3801-18T2 NINA SEIGELSTEIN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, July 29, 2020
Campbell v. Campbellpublic domain
Dan F. Campbell (the "husband") and Nina Sue Campbell (the "wife") were married in 1986. They adopted the wife's grandson. In September 1996, the husband sued for divorce. The case was set for a reference hearing1 for the determination of child support pendente lite. At the reference hearing, the parties agreed that, in lieu of child support, "the expenses would be paid in the same manner as [they were] previously paid." The trial cou
Horton v. City of Oaklandpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 582 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 583 Appellants Sam C. Horton and Cheri Bryant, Oakland residents and taxpayers, brought this action to challenge a city ordinance au
Byers v. Cathcartpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 807 OPINION This appeal concerns an injunction issued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 (section 527.6) Section 527.6 is a specialized statute providing an expedited procedure
Hamman v. Bright & Co.public domain
924 S.W.2d 168 (1996) Henry R. HAMMAN, et al., Appellants, v. BRIGHT & COMPANY, et al., Appellees. No. 07-93-0245-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. February 29, 1996. Opinion Overruling Motions for Rehearing May 15, 1996. *169 Kolodey & Thomas, Tom Thomas, Dallas, Carr, Fouts, Hunt, Craig, Terrill,
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Final judgment, entered August 15, 2016, affirmed, with. $25 costs. Tenant operates a restaurant at 2637 Broadway in Manhattan. Tenant’s original lease term was from March 1, 2000 through December 31, 2009. A rider to the lease set forth a series of escalating base rents, ranging from $10,000 per month in March 2000 to $16,590.42 per month in 2009. In O
New Whitehall Apts. LLC v. S.A v. Assoc. Inc.public domain
New Whitehall Apartments LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, againstS.A.V. Associates Inc., Respondent-Tenant-Appellant. Tenant appeals from a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Carol R. Feinman, J.), entered August 15, 2016, after a nonjury trial, which awarded landlord possession in a holdover summary proceeding. Per Curiam.
In Re Smithpublic domain
315 B.R. 636 (2004) In re Donald F. SMITH, Debtor. No. 04-10760-CJK. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. *637 Nina M. Parker, Esq., Parker & Associates, Winchester, MA, for debtor. David J. Reier, Esq., Seyfarth Shaw, Boston, MA, for Eagle Bank. George R. Desmond, Esq., Framingham, MA,
Garry Jack Sullivan, as Independent of the Estate of Juanita Gibson v. Sherry Layne Hatchettpublic domain
In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of T exas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00296-CV GARRY JACK SULLIVAN, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JUANITA GIBSON, APPELLANT V. SHERRY LAYNE HATCHETT, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 287th District Court
Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.public domain
*53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Nina Shervin, M.D. (“Dr. Sher-vin”) has brought suit against the several Defendants based on alleged gender discrimination. D. 38. Dr. Shervin’s complaint alleges: gender discrimination in violation of Mass. Gen. L. c. 151B (“c.151B”) against Defendants
United States v. Dyerpublic domain
750 F.Supp. 1278 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Randall K. DYER, et al. Crim. No. 90-00183-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 30, 1990. *1279 *1280 Henry E. Hudson, U.S. Atty., Lawrence J. Leiser, Quincy L. Ollison, Asst. U.S. Attys., Geoffrey R. B
Allen, Jr. v. Environmental Restorationpublic domain
Appellate Case: 19-2197 Document: 010110678995 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 3, 2022
Allen, Jr. v. Environmental Restorationpublic domain
Appellate Case: 19-2197 Document: 010110678978 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 3, 2022
Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CAROLYN DAVIS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 07-cv-1302 (RCL)
Herrera v. TBC Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment) HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge. This is a putative collective action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The proposed class, which seeks overtime compensation, encompasses all mechanics employed by Defendants TBC Retail Group, Inc. and NTW, LLC d/b/a NTB who are paid o
Center for Biological Diversity v. Nortonpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action 04-01660 (HHK) KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant. REBECCA ANN CARY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action 06-02120 (HHK)
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
PER CURIAM: This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding involving charges of professional misconduct filed against the Respondent, Michael R. Davis (“Davis”). On October 7, 2011, a panel of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) issued a report (“Violation Report”)1 that concluded Davis violated the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (the “Rules”) and the Delaware Lawye
Bayou Steel v. Evanston Insurancepublic domain
ORDER AND REASONS MARTIN L.C. FELDMAN, District Judge. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED and the defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Background The facts underlying this coverage dispute are familiar, indeed, stipulated and otherwise outlined in the U.S. Fifth Circu
Veera Daruwalla v. Cassie Hampepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2744 ___________________________ In re: T-Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation ------------------------------ Veera Daruwalla, Washington Western, 2:23-cv-01118; John G. Cooke, Washington Western, 2:21-cv-01324; Michael March, Washingt