Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nikita D. Brown”
Nikita West v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-22-00031-CR NIKITA WEST, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 50724-A Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
Tyreese Nikita Crayton v. State of Alabamapublic domain
Rel: May 5, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
370 F.3d 417 Marlene Luticia JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.Karen Moten; Nikita Atkinson; Marquel Merriman; Keisha Johnson; Peggy Redman; Pamela Nicole Brown; Cheryl Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Circuit City Stores, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-1256. No. 02-1257. United States Court of Ap
Mehta v. AIG Sunamerica Life Assurance Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM MOTZ, District Judge. The plaintiffs in these actions purchased variable annuities from the defendant insurance companies that included mutual funds as investment options. Certain of these funds, in which the plaintiffs invested, contained foreign securities. They now seek compensation for the alleged dilutive damage their holdings suffered as a result of market timers that exploited the funds’ “
WINN v. the STATE.public domain
Barnes, Presiding Judge. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Nikita Tayaneka Winn appeals from his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, trafficking in illegal drugs (heroin), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. On appeal, Winn contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, the trial court erred in denying h
James v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MOTZ joined. OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. We are presented in this interlocutory appeal with two issues: whether the federal four-year limitations period in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1658 applies to cl
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ELAINE DAMIANAKIS, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Nikitas ) Damianakis, )
Terry v. Statepublic domain
PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 1. Nikita Terry was convicted in the Circuit Court of Attala County on one count of burglary of a dwelling house. The circuit court denied Terry's motion for post-conviction collateral relief. Feeling aggrieved, Terry filed this appeal. FACTS ¶ 2. On September 5, 1997, Terry pled guilty to the June 13, 1997 burglary of a dwelling. Terry was sentenced to a term of twenty years' imprisonmen
8 F.3d 626 63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 182,63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,624Christopher D. ABURIME, Plaintiff-Appellant,Bobby W. Lucas; Blanche Clay; Joseph R. Richburg; SandraWilliams; Alvin Williams; Gwendolyn J. Stevens; LarryWashington; Marcia L. Atkins; Robert Garner; Richard M.Jones; James Baul; Sandra Holmes; Deartice Sanders;Susan Hagood, Plaintiffs,v.NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee,<
DR v. Andrea (In re Andrea)public domain
Thomas M. Lynch, United States Bankruptcy Judge Michael Draka was thrown from his motorcycle in a collision with Joshua Andrea on Route 25 one summer evening.1 Eventually, Mr. Draka obtained a $ 1 million default judgment in state court for his injuries. After Mr. Andrea filed for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, Mr. Draka commenced this adversary proceeding to seek a determination that th
Damianakis v. Philip Morris USA Inc.public domain
WALLACE, Judge. Elaine Damianakis, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nikitas Damia-nakis, appeals a final judgment in favor of Philip Morris USA, Inc., which followed the trial court’s grant of Philip Morris’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted Philip Morris’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the statute of limitations barred Mrs. Damia-
R & J Construction Supply Co. v. Juma (In re Juma)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAMELA S. HOLLIS, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the court following trial on the complaint brought by R & J Construction Supply Co., Inc., now known as CCS Contractor Equipment & Supply, Inc. (“Supply”), against Sam Juma. Supply sought a finding that Junta’s debt is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).1
Richardson v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cour
Richardson v. Statepublic domain
318 Ga. 690 FINAL COPY S24A0179. RICHARDSON v. THE STATE. LAGRUA, Justice. Appellant Matthew Richardson appeals his convictions for felony murder and other crimes related to the shooting death of Julius Aderhold III.1 Richardson contends that (1) the trial court committed plain error when it admitted testimony of a detective that improperly bolstered out-of-court statements by two other witnesses; and (2) his trial counsel provided constitut
R & J Construction Supply Co. v. Jumapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge R & J Construction Supply Company, Inc., now known as CCS Contractors Equipment and Supply, Inc. (“Supply”), filed an adversary complaint against Sam Juma (“Juma”) arguing that his debt to Supply was non-dischargeable in bankruptcy under the statutory exception for “willful and malicious” injuries to property. 11 U.S.C. § 523(
Leger v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurancepublic domain
LPEATROSS, Judge. This appeal arises from a finding by the trial court that an uninsured/underinsured (“UM”) rejection form provided by Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (“IINA”) was invalid because it failed to provide the insured with the three options required by statute. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 19, 1995, Denni
DirecTV, Inc. v. Schulienpublic domain
401 F.Supp.2d 906 (2005) DIRECTV, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. Pete SCHULIEN, Defendant. No. 03 C 8088. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 17, 2005. *907 *908 Paul Alan Rettberg, Anne M. Belanger, Brandon K. Lemley, Ernie Burden, Timothy R. Rabel, Querrey &a;
Petties v. District of Columbiapublic domain
238 F.Supp.2d 114 (2002) Nikita PETTIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 95-0148(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2002. *115 Kelly Bagby, Jesse D. Stein, Lisae C. Jordan, University Legal Services, Bradford P. Johnson, Goodman & Johnson, Was
Petties v. District of Columbiapublic domain
238 F.Supp.2d 88 (2002) Nikita PETTIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 95-0148(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 14, 2002. *89 James Feldesman, Tanya Ann Harvey, Khatereh S. Hiladi, Feldesman, Tucker, Leifer, Fidell & Bank, LLP, Washington, DC,
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-2968 ____________ NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES