Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nieves v. Microsoft Corporation”
Boathouse Group, Inc. v. Tigerlogic Corporationpublic domain
777 F.Supp.2d 243 (2011) BOATHOUSE GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-12125-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 7, 2011. *246 David A. Kluft, Julia Huston, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. Todd S. Holbrook, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Bosto
Tallant v. United States Department of the Armypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge These cases present an unusual line-up of plaintiffs who want to litigate their cases as far from their home as possible, and a federal government agency that wants to move them as far from Washington, D.C. as possible. They arose after the Alaska National Guard
Las Cumbres Fuel, Corp v. Vp Petroleum, LLC.public domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII Las Cumbres Fuel Corp., REVISIÓN San Claudio Fuel Corp., ADMINISTRATIVA Señorial Fuel Corp., procedente del Dept. Paseo Petroleum Corp. y de Desarrollo Carlos Hernández h/n/c Económico y Puma Venus Gardens Come
Santiago v. WHM Carib, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, Docket # 35, Defendants’ opposition thereto, Docket #36, and the parties’ replies, Dockets ## 41 & 48. After reviewing the filings and applicable law, Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII Las Cumbres Fuel Corp., REVISIÓN San Claudio Fuel Corp., ADMINISTRATIVA Señorial Fuel Corp., procedente del Dept. Paseo Petroleum Corp. y de Desarrollo Carlos Hernández h/n/c Económico y Puma Venus Gardens Come
Christians v. KemPharm, Inc.public domain
ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, Judge U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court is Plaintiff Kevin Christians’s Motion to Remand, filed on February 13, 2017. Clerk’s No. 22. Defen*973dants KemPharm, Ine., Travis C. Mickle, Gordon K. Johnson, R. LaDuane Clifton, Sven Guenther, Christal- M.M. Mickle, Danny L. Thompson, Matthew R. Plooster, Richard W. Paseoe, Jo
Otero-Merced v. PREFERRED HEALTH, INC.public domain
680 F.Supp.2d 388 (2010) Enrique OTERO-MERCED, Lydia D. Puente-Colón, and their conjugal partnership, Plaintiffs, v. PREFERRED HEALTH INC., David Muñoz-Hernández, Gwendolyn Muñoz-Firpi, and their insurance underwriter, Defendants. Civil No. 09-1144 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 26, 2010. *389 Erick
Ramos v. Vizcarrondopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, District Judge. ■ On August 1, 2014, Edwin Ramos (“Plaintiff’), brought this employment dis*96crimination action in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance against José- R. Vizcarrondo (“Vizcarrondo-Camón”), Linda Lebber Johnson (“Lebber”), José A. Vizcarrondo (“Vizcarrondo-Toro”), Julio E. Vizcarrondo-
Reyes-Ortiz v. McConnell Valdespublic domain
714 F.Supp.2d 234 (2010) Carmen Z. REYES-ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. McCONNELL VALDES, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 09-1933 (GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. *235 Luis F. Del-Valle-Emmanuelli, Del Valle Emanuelli Law Offices, Carolina, PR, for Plaintiff. Eduardo J. Corretjer-Reyes, Roberto Corr
Castellanos v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLCpublic domain
URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the following Motions: (1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, D.E. 54; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, D.E. 37; and (3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, D.E. 41. THE COU
Bonilla-Perez v. Citibank NA, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the plaintiffs motion to remand to state court (Docket # 12), and the defendants’ opposition thereto (Docket # 15). After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, the plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. Factual and Procedural Background This is a putative diversity action to recover d
Aspect Software, Inc. v. Barnettpublic domain
787 F.Supp.2d 118 (2011) ASPECT SOFTWARE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Gary BARNETT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 11-10754-DJC. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 27, 2011. Order Denying Motion to Amend September 14, 2011. *121 Lawrence P. Murray, Michael V. Samarel, Burns & Levinson, Boston, MA, for P
Menzies Aviation, Inc. v. Wilcoxpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF LAW MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. [Docket No. 6] The Court heard oral argument on October 17, 2013. The Court denied the motion in an October 17 Order [Docket No. 40] with a memorandum of law to follow. Accordingly, the Court hereby enters the following Memorandum of L
609 F.Supp.2d 217 (2009) Edna J. VAZQUEZ VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff v. CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS OF PUERTO RICO, INC., et al, Defendants. Civil No. 08-1271 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 24, 2009. *218 Frank D. Inserni-Milam, Frank D. Inserni Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Juan J. Casillas-Ayala, Ped
(2008) Euripides DEL-VILLAR-ROSARIO, Plaintiff v. PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-2244 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 13, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are several Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 11, 12, 17, 20, 36, and 42). Furthe
Román v. University of Puerto Ricopublic domain
AMENDED OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Felipe Cardona Román (“Car-dona” or “Plaintiff”) filed a complaint on May 1, 2010 (Docket No. 1) against Defendant University of Puerto Rico (“UPR”) and Defendants Antonio Garcia Padilla (“Garcia Padilla”), Jose De La Torre (“De La Torre”), Gladys Escalona De Motta (“Escalona”),
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2026 TSPR 41 María V. Irizarry Centeno (TS-10,355) 218 DPR ___ Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry (TS-18,907) Número del Caso: AB-2025-0232 Fecha: 21 de abril de 2026 Representantes legales de las promovidas: Lcdo. Virgilio Mainardi Peralta Lcdo. Luis M. García Tous Lcdo. Alfredo III López Garay Materia: Conducta Profes
Rivera-Concepción v. Commonwealthpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. This case arises from plaintiff Jayrie Rivera-Concepción’s (“Jayrie”) expulsion in January 2007 from the Córdova and Fernós Congressional Internship Program (“Program”) subsequent to her sudden manifestation of a previously-undiagnosed bipolar disorder. (See Docket No. 10-3). Before the court are the parties’ memoran
Rivera Maldonado v. Hospital Alejandro Otero Lopezpublic domain
614 F.Supp.2d 181 (2009) Idalia RIVERA MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. HOSPITAL ALEJANDRO OTERO LOPEZ y/o Manati Medical Center Dr. Otero Lopez; Nilda Paravisini, and Dr. Carlos Disdier, Defendants. Civ. No. 05-1968 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2009. *184 Juan M. Frontera-Suau, Frontera Suau Law Office,
Archud, Psc v. Universidad De Puerto Ricopublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL (X) DJ 2024-062C ARCHUD, PSC REVISIÓN JUDICIAL procedente de la Recurrente Universidad de Puerto Rico v. TA2025RA00191 UNIVERSIDAD DE