Cases

RENDERED: NOVEMBER 15, 2024; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2022-CA-1202-MR ASHLEY NICOLE HARNEY APPELLANT (NOW MCCONATHY) APPEAL FROM JESSAMINE CIRCUIT COURT v. FAMILY COURT DIVISION HONORABLE JEFFREY C.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CAROLYN HOSKINS and LOLITA E. JOHNS, her wife, Petitioners, v. JENNA HARRISON, D.O., and WOMEN'S CARE FLORIDA, LLC, Respondents. No. 2D2025-2263 April 22, 2026 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinella

Vacate and Dismiss in part; Affirm in part and Opinion Filed January 2, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00198-CV ELDORADO HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant V. R. MICHAEL CLOUGH, J. MICHELLE CLOUGH, ADAM FLIERL, NICOLE FLIERL, BILLY FOWLER, SUSAN FOWLER, JACK HOLMES, JACQUI HOLMES, DOU

ACCEPTED 15-25-00072-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/3/2025 10:25 AM No. 15-25-00072-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRI

ACCEPTED 15-25-00072-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00072-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________

ACCEPTED 15-25-00072-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/26/2025 5:03 PM No. 15-25-00072-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Motion to Dismiss Denied; Affirmed and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed November 7, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00739-CV CENTER ROSE PARTNERS, LTD., INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY AS A MEMBER OF ROSE ACQUISITION LLC, DAVID FELT, NICOLE FELT, AND LLOYD HALL, Appellants V. JERRY W. BAILEY AND DAVID SONNIER, App

PER CURIAM: This petition for a writ of prohibition challenges the jurisdiction of the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline (the Commission). Jennifer Henry challenges the Commission's jurisdiction over her as a hearing master, arguing that NRS 1.428, the statute giving the Commission its purported jurisdiction over her, is unconstitutional. We hold that NRS 1.428 is constitutional and accordingly hearing masters are subject to

135 Nev., Advance Opinion 5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JENNIFER HENRY, No. 75675 Petitioner, vs. NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL fL DISCIPLINE, FEB 29 Li9

135 Nev., Advance Opinion 5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JENNIFER HENRY, No. 75675 Petitioner, vs. NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL fL DISCIPLINE, FEB 29 Li9

594 F.Supp.2d 610 (2009) Mary Ann CATLEDGE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott C. Catledge, Sr., Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. C/A No. 0:08-1585-CMC. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division. January 21, 2009. *611 Philip Edward Wright, Lancaster, SC, Robert Edwar

Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Stay, (Doc. 12), and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, (Doc. 33). The Court grants both motions. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jason E. Rappaport brought suit against his former employer, Defendant The Federal Savings Bank ("TFSB"), and its CEO, Stephen M. Calk. (Doc. 1). Mr. Rappaport alleg

981 So.2d 153 (2008) DUFRENE CHIROPRACTIC v. WALGREEN LOUISIANA CO., INC. No. 08-47. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 9, 2008. Errol King, Layna Cook, Baton Rouge, LA, for Third Party Defendant-Relator, American Lifecare, Inc. Nicole F. Gould, Baton Rouge, LA, for Third Party Defendants-Relators, Concentra Integrated Services, Inc., Focus He

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions || January 14, 2016 Colorado Court of Appeals -- January 14, 2016 2016 COA 07. No. 15CA0083. Fetzer v. Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections. Â COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016 COA 07

WATTS, J., concurring. Respectfully, I concur in the judgment in both cases, Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, and Townsend v. Midland Funding, but I write separately to explain my reasons. Like the Majority, I conclude that Rule 3-306 sets forth the requirements for obtaining a judgment on affidavit, not the requi

689 F.Supp.2d 910 (2010) John T. VALENTE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, Defendant. Case No. 3:08-cv-225. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. January 4, 2010. *914 John Valente, Dayton, OH, pro se. Jennifer Nicole Fuller, Paul Gerard Hallinan, Dayton, OH, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS WOODS AND BELLEVUE’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MMIC’S MOTION TO DISMISS KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Nicole and Robert Nichols, bring claims against defendant Dr. Michael P. Woods and Bellevue Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C., (Bellevue) alleging medical malpractice, negligent infliction of emotional distres

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER. The issue in this appeal is whether a district court acted outside the scope of its jurisdiction when it issued an order requiring a guardian to provide all financial records related to a court-ordered accounting and to make restitution to a guardianship account. Because the district court is granted exclusive jurisdiction to manage and settle guar