Cases

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00362-CV __________________ ROGELIO ESTRADA RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. GABRIELLA NICOLE MCDOW, Appellee ___________________________________________________

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII JUAN R. RODRÍGUEZ, APELACIÓN CARMEN PRADO ACOGIDA COMO SANTAMARÍA CERTIORARI procedente del Demandantes- Tribunal de Primera

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-1415 Lower Tribunal No. 2018-DR-011064-O _____________________________ LOUIS ROMAN OROSCO, Appellant, v. MIGUEL A. RODRIGUEZ and BRITTANY NICOLE

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Appellant challenges the amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage and the post-final-judgment income withholding for child support and alimony order ("IWO"). Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs filed, we affirm the amended final judgment without further discussion.

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Appellant challenges the amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage and the post-final-judgment income withholding for child support and alimony order ("IWO"). Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs filed, we affirm the amended final judgment without further discussion.

Judge RODRÍGUEZ (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court. An inculpatory statement made by an accused prior to trial, and later introduced as evidence, may be very persuasive to a jury precisely because it comes from the mouth of the accused. In this *133 appeal

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL DARLYE FARRAH Apelación CORONADO AYALA procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelante Instancia, Sala de Carolina v. KLAN202500336

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED without prejudice to file a timely, facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE, United States Magistrate Judge Miami-Dade County moves to amend or alter judgment entered in Nadia Rodriguez's favor on her retaliation claim following the jury's verdict. (Doc. 144). Ms. Rodriguez opposes Miami-Dade County's motion. (Doc. 151). She also moves for additur, to amend or alter judgment on the jury's findings on damages on her retaliation claim, and, alternatively, for a new trial on damages. (Doc

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL NICOLE MARIE APELACIÓN RODRÍGUEZ OTERO Y procedente del YAMIL RODRÍGUEZ Tribunal de RIVERA, POR SÍ Y EN Primera Instancia, REPRESENTACIÓN DE SU HIJA Sala Superior de MENOR DE EDAD, ALANA Bayamón

Opinion & Order SALVADOR E.’CABELLAS, United States Senior District Judge • In this political discrimination action, several transitory employees of the Municipality of Arecibo (the Municipality) allege that their employment contracts were not renewed due to their political affiliation with the Popular Democratic Party (PDP). These Plaintiffs are currently represented

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

OPINION AND ORDER1 FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, United , States District Judge Plaintiff Endel Rodriguez-Cortes (“Rodriguez”) brought suit against-his former employer, Superintendencia' del Capitolio (“Superintendence”), Javier Vazquez-Col-lazo, in his official and personal capacities, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, seeking reinstatement and monetary damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

ORDER Counsel for Appellants/Cross-Appellees is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the improper oral argument before this Court on July 24, 2015, based on an L.A. Times news article, published July 21, 2015, three days before oral argument in this case, entitled “Suspect was fighting deportation,” the source for which is identified as “federal authorities” and which directly references and quotes from earlier

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIYERIN, United States Magistrate Judge Roberto ;■ Cano-Rodriguez (“Cano”) brought this § 1983 action against Cesar Miranda Rodriguez in his official capacity as the Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Jose Negron Fernandez (“Negron”) in his official capacity as Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“DCR”), and Narciso

OPINION AND ORDER JOSE ANTONIO FUSTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On October 16, 2014, plaintiff Eileen Domenech-Rodriguez (“Domenech”) commenced this action against defendant Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular”), by filing a complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation claims under -Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, and several Puerto Rico laws. (ECF No. 1.) Banco

366 S.W.3d 216 (2012) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE and Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Juan RODRIGUEZ, Appellee. No. 14-10-00995-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). February 16, 2012. Rehearing Overruled May 9, 2012. *219 Nicole Shirley Bakare, Ronald J. Restrepo, Houston,

587 F.3d 573 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Domingo RODRIGUEZ and Jorge Garcia-Reynoso, Defendants-Appellants. Docket Nos. 08-2805-cr (L), 08-2880-cr (CON). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Heard: October 19, 2009. Decided: November 30, 2009. *574 Beverly Van Ness, New York, N.Y., fo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are five motions in limine filed by defendant Fiddler, Gonzalez & Rodriguez, PSC (“FGR”), (Docket Nos. 101-105), and two motions in limine filed by plaintiff Maria del Carmen Taboas (“Taboas”) (Docket Nos. 100 &' 114-1.) The Court addresses each motion in turn below. I. Taboas’s Motion to Exclude FG

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are plaintiff Maria del Carmen Taboas’ (“Taboas”) motion for partial judgment on the pleadings; Fiddler, Gonzalez & Rodriguez PSC’s (“FGR”) opposition; FGR’s motion for leave to file an amended answer to the complaint; and Ta-boas’ opposition. (Docket Nos. 25, 30, 31, & 32.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Taboas’ motion for pa